You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
27 May 2009Mask salvage in the age of capital contraction
An advanced photomask is rarely made meeting all specifications in one attempt. In the photomask industry, yield is the critical component to all key performance measures including cost and delivery time. Defect-free advanced masks are extremely difficult to manufacture but leading-edge masks simultaneously meeting atomic level pattern placement, angstrom level CD uniformity, and defectivity to virus size sensitivity are a rarity. While the patterning and inspection segments have been the long-time nemeses of cost, the ideal mask fabrication process will perform these operations only once per mask order. To enable this, mask salvage processes are essential. Defects are the primary priority and are addressed with cleaning and repair techniques of various types targeted to needs. CD uniformity is addressed with predictive and feedback mapping techniques. CD uniformity is also addressed with post-mask fabrication gray-mask correction and dose correction at the scanner. Mask pattern placement correction by systematic error mapping is done but post-mask-patterning correction represents an opportunity for salvage process development. Until consistently superior mask registration can be achieved during or after patterning, self-aligned wafer processing will continue to be the primary enabling method for optical double-exposure while normal scaling issues will challenge EUV mask development.
It is the ability to perform the high-cost operations only once to create each mask and then recover individual specification parameters with salvage operations which will differentiate mask makers in the future.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Kurt R. Kimmel, "Mask salvage in the age of capital contraction," Proc. SPIE 7470, 25th European Mask and Lithography Conference, 747004 (27 May 2009); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.835795