You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
The achievement of a depth of focus required for stable process conditions is one of the biggest challenges in
modern optical photolithography. There are several ways of improving the depth of focus. For line/space
layers, for instance, application of RET (Resolution Enhancement Technology) using scattering bars, phaseshift
masks or optimized illumination systems have shown good results. For contact and via layers the depth
of focus is limited and critical, due to the structure size of the holes, alternating pattern density and wafer
topology. A well known method of improving the depth of focus for contact and via layers is called focus
latitude enhancement exposure (FLEX) [1-3]. With FLEX, several focal planes are being exposed, i.e. each
during a separate exposure step. The main drawback is low throughput, as the total processing time rises
which each additional exposure.
In this paper, we investigate Nikon's CDP (continuous depth of focus expansion procedure) [4]. The CDP
option is applicable to modern scanning exposure tools [4-5]. A schematic view of the procedure is shown in
Fig. 1. The CDP value or CDP amplitude defines the tilt of the wafer and thus the range of focus in the resist,
as the focus plane migrates through the resist during the exposure. The main advantage of CDP, compared
to FLEX, is higher throughput, since focal planes are defined within a single exposure. A non-CDP exposure
may result in varying aerial images within resist thickness, therefore leading to decreased image contrast
within out-of-focus planes. As shown in Fig. 1 the averaged aerial images of a CDP exposure induce better
image contrast throughout the resist layer and therefore increase the focus window.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
S. Geisler, J. Bauer, U. Haak, K. Schulz, G. Old, E. Matthus, "CDP: application of focus drilling," Proc. SPIE 7470, 25th European Mask and Lithography Conference, 747015 (27 May 2009); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.835204