You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
18 September 2009Comparison of three methods based on the temperature-NDVI
diagram for soil moisture characterization
The triangle/trapezoid method is a well known method for retrieving spatialized soil moisture from remotely sensed
temperature and vegetation index (NDVI). We selected three approaches with different requirements for ancillary data
(triangle empirical method by Sandholt et al. [7], trapezoid method by Moran et al. [2], SVAT triangle method by
Carlson et al. [3]-[6]). The empirical inversion is well suited when no information on meteorological data is available.
Otherwise, one can build theoretical isolines in the T-NDVI-moisture space by applying the Penman-Monteith equation
or by using a detailed SVAT model. The three approaches were compared by using remote sensing data obtained during
the airborne HyEurope 2007 campaign over Camargue, south of France. We showed that the SVAT-triangle method has
a potential for separately identifying surface moisture and root zone moisture.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Jean-Claude Krapez, Albert Olioso, Benoit Coudert, "Comparison of three methods based on the temperature-NDVI diagram for soil moisture characterization," Proc. SPIE 7472, Remote Sensing for Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Hydrology XI, 74720Y (18 September 2009); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.830451