You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
18 September 2009Disease detection in sugar beet fields: a multi-temporal and multi-sensoral approach on different scales
Depending on environmental factors fungal diseases of crops are often distributed heterogeneously in fields. Precision
agriculture in plant protection implies a targeted fungicide application adjusted these field heterogeneities. Therefore an
understanding of the spatial and temporal occurrence of pathogens is elementary. As shown in previous studies, remote
sensing techniques can be used to detect and observe spectral anomalies in the field. In 2008, a sugar beet field site was
observed at different growth stages of the crop using different remote sensing techniques. The experimental field site
consisted of two treatments. One plot was sprayed with a fungicide to avoid fungal infections. In order to obtain sugar
beet plants infected with foliar diseases the other plot was not sprayed. Remote sensing data were acquired from the
high-resolution airborne hyperspectral imaging ROSIS in July 2008 at sugar beet growth stage 39 and from the HyMap
sensor systems in August 2008 at sugar beet growth stage 45, respectively. Additionally hyperspectral signatures of
diseased and non-diseased sugar beet plants were measured with a non-imaging hand held spectroradiometer at growth
stage 49 in September. Ground truth data, in particular disease severity were collected at 50 sampling points in the field.
Changes of reflection rates were related to disease severity increasing with time. Erysiphe betae causing powdery
mildew was the most frequent leaf pathogen. A classification of healthy and diseased sugar beets in the field was
possible by using hyperspectral vegetation indices calculated from canopy reflectance.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Anne-Katrin Mahlein, Christian Hillnhütter, Thorsten Mewes, Christine Scholz, Ulrike Steiner, Heinz-Willhelm Dehne, Erich-Christian Oerke, "Disease detection in sugar beet fields: a multi-temporal and multi-sensoral approach on different scales," Proc. SPIE 7472, Remote Sensing for Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Hydrology XI, 747228 (18 September 2009); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.830455