You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
9 October 2009Performance modeling for A-SCOPE: a space-borne lidar measuring atmospheric CO2
A-SCOPE (Advanced Space Carbon and Climate Observation of Planet Earth) has been one of the six candidates for the
third cycle of the Earth Explorer Core missions, selected by the European Space Agency (ESA) for assessment studies.
Earth Explorer missions focus on the science and research aspects of ESA's Living Planet Programme. A-SCOPE
mission aims at observing atmospheric CO2 for a better understanding of the carbon cycle. Knowledge about the spatial
distribution of sources and sinks of CO2 with unprecedented accuracy will provide urgently needed information about the global carbon cycle. A-SCOPE mission encompasses a new approach to observe the Earth from space based on an IPDA
(Integrated Path Differential Absorption) Lidar. Based on the known principle of a differential measurement technique,
the IPDA lidar relies on the measurement of the laser echoes reflected by hard targets as the ground or the top of the
vegetation. Such a time-gated technique is a promising way to overcome the sources of systematic errors inherent to
passive missions. To be fully exploited, it however translates into stringent instrument requirements and requires a
dedicated performance assessment. In this paper, the A-SCOPE instrument concept is first presented, with the aim of
summarizing some important outcomes from the industrial assessment studies. After a discussion of the mission requirements and measurement principles, an overview is given about the instrument architecture. Then the instrument performance is reported, together with a detailed discussion about sources of systematic errors, which pose the strongest technical challenges.