You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
24 March 2011Utility of rapid database searching for quality assurance: 'detective
work' in uncovering radiology coding and billing errors
When the first quarter of 2010 Department of Radiology statistics were provided to the Section Chiefs, the authors
(SH, BC) were alarmed to discover that Ultrasound showed a decrease of 2.5 percent in billed examinations. This
seemed to be in direct contradistinction to the experience of the ultrasound faculty members and sonographers. Their
experience was that they were far busier than during the same quarter of 2009. The one exception that all
acknowledged was the month of February, 2010 when several major winter storms resulted in a much decreased
Hospital admission and Emergency Department visit rate. Since these statistics in part help establish priorities for
capital budget items, professional and technical staffing levels, and levels of incentive salary, they are taken very
seriously.
The availability of a desktop, Web-based RIS database search tool developed by two of the authors (WK, WB) and
built-in database functions of the ultrasound miniPACS, made it possible for us very rapidly to develop and test
hypotheses for why the number of billable examinations was declining in the face of what experience told the authors
was an increasing number of examinations being performed. Within a short time, we identified the major cause as
errors on the part of the company retained to verify billable Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes against
ultrasound reports. This information is being used going forward to recover unbilled examinations and take measures to
reduce or eliminate the types of coding errors that resulted in the problem.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Steven C. Horii, Woojin Kim, William Boonn, Christopher Iyoob, Keith Maston, Beverly G. Coleman, "Utility of rapid database searching for quality assurance: 'detective work' in uncovering radiology coding and billing errors," Proc. SPIE 7967, Medical Imaging 2011: Advanced PACS-based Imaging Informatics and Therapeutic Applications, 796705 (24 March 2011); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.878816