You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
Recently, many computational saliency models have been introduced2, 5, 7, 13, 23 to transform a given image into
a scalar-valued map that represents visual saliency of the input image. These approaches, however, generally
assume the given image is clean. Fortunately, most methods implicitly suppress the noise before calculating the
saliency by blurring and downsampling the input image, and therefore tend to be apparently rather insensitive to
noise.11 However, a fundamental and explicit treatment of saliency in noisy images is missing from the literature.
Indeed, as we will show, the price for this apparent insensitivity to noise is that the overall performance over a
large range of noise strengths is diminished. Accordingly, the question is how to compute saliency in a reliable
way when a noise-corrupted image is given. To address this problem, we propose a novel and statistically sound
method for estimating saliency based on a non-parametric regression framework. The proposed estimate of
the saliency at a pixel is a data-dependent weighted average of dissimilarities between a center patch and its
surrounding patches. This aggregation of the dissimilarities is simple and more stable despite the presence of
noise. For comparison's sake, we apply a state of the art denoising approach before attempting to calculate the
saliency map, which obviously produces much more stable results for noisy images. Despite the advantage of
preprocessing, we still found that our method consistently outperforms the other state-of-the-art2, 13 methods
over a large range of noise strengths.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Chelhwon Kim, Peyman Milanfar, "Finding saliency in noisy images," Proc. SPIE 8296, Computational Imaging X, 82960U (10 February 2012); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.905760