You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
6 March 2012Performance differences across the Atlantic when UK and USA radiologists read the same set of test screening cases
Two groups of experienced radiologists from the UK and the USA read the same set of 40 recent FFDM screening cases
to examine the effects of mammography experience, volume of cases read per year, screening practice and monitor
resolution on performance,. Sixteen American radiologists reported these cases using twin DICOM calibrated monitors
which were half the resolution of the clinical mammographic workstations used by 16 UK radiologists. In terms of
effects of volume of cases read per year, then when the group of American radiologists were split into high and low
volume readers (using 5,000 cases p.a. as a criterion) no difference in any performance measure was found. This may be
partly explained by the fact that they were all were very experienced which may have counteracted any case volume
effect here. Comparing the two groups of radiologists from both countries, then the UK group performed better in terms
of the number of cancers detected although the American group recalled more cases, despite having poorer monitors.
This reflects differences in clinical screening practice between the countries, however differences simply due to the
reporting monitors used cannot be ruled out. Data from the study were also compared to that from all UK screeners who
had read these cases as either soft copy or as mammographic film.
Yan Chen,Alastair G. Gale, andMichael Evanoff
"Performance differences across the Atlantic when UK and USA radiologists read the same set of test screening cases", Proc. SPIE 8318, Medical Imaging 2012: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 831811 (6 March 2012); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.913609
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Yan Chen, Alastair G. Gale, Michael Evanoff, "Performance differences across the Atlantic when UK and USA radiologists read the same set of test screening cases," Proc. SPIE 8318, Medical Imaging 2012: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 831811 (6 March 2012); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.913609