Translator Disclaimer
Paper
27 September 2012 Generic misalignment aberration patterns and the subspace of benign misalignment
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Q1: Why deploy N wavefront sensors on a three mirror anastigmat (TMA) and not N + 1? Q2: Why measure M Zernike coefficients and not M + 1? Q3: Why control L rigid body degrees of freedom (total) on the secondary and tertiary and not L + 1? The usual answer: “We did a lot of ray tracing and N, M, and L seemed OK.” We show how straightforward results from aberration theory may be used to address these questions. We consider, in particular, the case of a three mirror anastigmat.
© (2012) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Paul L. Schechter and Rebecca Sobel Levinson "Generic misalignment aberration patterns and the subspace of benign misalignment", Proc. SPIE 8444, Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes IV, 844455 (27 September 2012); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.925075
PROCEEDINGS
6 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
RELATED CONTENT

Turkey's next big science project DAG the 4 meter...
Proceedings of SPIE (July 22 2014)
Design of a derotator for the 4 m DAG telescope
Proceedings of SPIE (August 09 2016)
Design optimization for x-ray telescopes
Proceedings of SPIE (September 09 2019)
Tomagraphic wavefront correction for the LSST
Proceedings of SPIE (June 27 2006)

Back to Top