Freehand ultrasound calibration: phantom versus tracked pointer

Mattea Welch; Jennifer Andrea; Tamas Ungi; Gabor Fichtinger

doi:10.1117/12.2007922

14 March 2013 Freehand ultrasound calibration: phantom versus tracked pointer

Mattea Welch, Jennifer Andrea, Tamas Ungi, Gabor Fichtinger

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 8671, Medical Imaging 2013: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling; 86711C (2013) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2007922
Event: SPIE Medical Imaging, 2013, Lake Buena Vista (Orlando Area), Florida, United States

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ultrasound-guided tracked navigation requires spatial calibration between the ultrasound beam and the tracker. We examined the reproducibility and accuracy of two popular open source calibration methods¹ with a handheld linear ultrasound transducer. METHODS: A total of 10 calibrations were performed using (1) a double N-wire phantom with automatic image segmentation and registration; (2) and registration of landmark points collected with a tracked pointer. Reproducibility and accuracy were characterized by comparing the resulting transformation matrices, and by comparing ground truth landmark points. RESULTS: Transformation matrices calculated with an N-wire phantom showed a variance of X: 0.02 mm (in the direction of sound propagation), Y: 0.03 mm (in the direction of transducer elements) and Z: 0.21 mm (in the elevation direction). Transformation matrices obtained with tracked pointer showed a variance of X: 0.1 mm, Y: 0.10 mm and Z: 0.43 mm. Calibration accuracy was tested with ground truth cross wire points. The N-wire phantom provided a calibration with a distance from ground truth of X: 2.44 ± 1.44 mm, Y: 1.21 ± 0.88 mm, and Z: 1.12 ± 0.82 mm. Tracked pointer calibration had a distance from the ground truth of X: 0.23 ± 0.16 mm, Y: 0.62 ± 0.31 mm, and Z: 0.45 ± 0.33 mm. Distance from ground truth was significantly less (p<0.01) with the tracked pointer method in all directions. CONCLUSION: Calibration using a tracked pointer had a slightly greater variance; however it showed better accuracy over calibrations calculated with N-wire phantoms.

Citation Download Citation

Mattea Welch, Jennifer Andrea, Tamas Ungi, and Gabor Fichtinger "Freehand ultrasound calibration: phantom versus tracked pointer", Proc. SPIE 8671, Medical Imaging 2013: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling, 86711C (14 March 2013); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2007922

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

;

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE