Paper
12 April 2013 Benchmarking study of 3D mask modeling for 2X and 1X nodes
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
With ever shrinking critical dimensions, half nm OPC errors are a primary focus for process improvement in computational lithography. Among many error sources for 2x and 1x nodes, 3D mask modeling has caught the attention of engineers and scientists as a method to reduce errors at these nodes. While the benefits of 3D mask modeling are well known, there will be a runtime penalty of 30-40% that needs to be weighed against the benefit of optical model accuracy improvements. The economically beneficial node to adopt 3D mask modeling has to be determined by balancing these factors. In this paper, a benchmarking study has been conducted on a 20nm cut mask, metal and via layers with two different computational lithography approaches as compared with standard thin-mask approximation modeling. Besides basic RMS error metrics for model calibration and verification, through pitch and through size optical proximity behavior, through focus model predictability, best focus prediction and common DOF prediction are thoroughly evaluated. Runtime impact and OPC accuracy are also studied.
© (2013) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
ChangAn Wang, Chao-Chun Liang, Huikan Liu, Chidam Kallingal, Derren Dunn, James Oberschmidt, and Jaione Tirapu Azpiroz "Benchmarking study of 3D mask modeling for 2X and 1X nodes", Proc. SPIE 8683, Optical Microlithography XXVI, 86831A (12 April 2013); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2011485
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Photomasks

3D modeling

Optical proximity correction

Performance modeling

Data modeling

Calibration

Critical dimension metrology

RELATED CONTENT

Calibrating OPC models using asymmetric structures
Proceedings of SPIE (March 15 2006)
Mask calibration dominated methodology for OPC matching
Proceedings of SPIE (November 14 2007)
Chip-level line-width prediction methodology
Proceedings of SPIE (July 12 2002)
Roadmap to sub-nanometer OPC model accuracy
Proceedings of SPIE (June 29 2012)

Back to Top