Translator Disclaimer
1 October 2013 Can violations of Bell's inequalities be considered as a final proof of quantum physics?
Author Affiliations +
Nowadays, it is commonly admitted that the experimental violation of Bell’s inequalities that was successfully demonstrated in the last decades by many experimenters, are indeed the ultimate proof of quantum physics and of its ability to describe the whole microscopic world and beyond. But the historical and scientific story may not be envisioned so clearly: it starts with the original paper of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) aiming at demonstrating that the formalism of quantum theory is incomplete. It then goes through the works of D. Bohm, to finally proceed to the famous John Bell’s relationships providing an experimental setup to solve the EPR paradox. In this communication is proposed an alternative reading of this history, showing that modern experiments based on correlations between light polarizations significantly deviate from the original spirit of the EPR paper. It is concluded that current experimental violations of Bell’s inequalities cannot be considered as an ultimate proof of the completeness of quantum physics models.
© (2013) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
François Hénault "Can violations of Bell's inequalities be considered as a final proof of quantum physics?", Proc. SPIE 8832, The Nature of Light: What are Photons? V, 88321J (1 October 2013);


Single-photon interference experiment for high schools
Proceedings of SPIE (July 17 2014)
Photon statistics: math versus mysticism
Proceedings of SPIE (October 01 2013)
Quantum Gaussian noise
Proceedings of SPIE (May 16 2003)
Two-particle quantum transmission
Proceedings of SPIE (October 15 2012)

Back to Top