Translator Disclaimer
Paper
27 June 1988 A Methodology For Making Operational Performance Comparisons Between Manual And Digital Radiology Configurations
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Many Radiology Departments are contemplating a move from manual operations to Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS) based operations. A question remains regarding the true cost-benefit of serious investments in PACS based operations. A methodology has been established by the Research Triangle Institute (RTI) in cooperation with the University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill which addresses aspects of the cost-benefit analysis of manual versus digital operations within a Radiology Department. The methodology has evolved as a collection of modeling tools and techniques. Early tools included spreadsheet models of existing activities within the UNC Radiology Department. Second generation tools now include deterministic network flow modeling and discrete event queuing network modeling packages. Complementary queuing models have been developed to separate the modeling of Department workload size and mix from the model of the man/machine system that services the workload. A range of performance measures have been incorporated into the second generation models. Among these measures are workload throughput, man/machine resource utilization, system and subsystem responses times, and resource availability measures.
© (1988) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
R. J. Wallace, N. M. Bengtson, R. E. Lackey, and P. A. Meehan "A Methodology For Making Operational Performance Comparisons Between Manual And Digital Radiology Configurations", Proc. SPIE 0914, Medical Imaging II, (27 June 1988); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.968741
PROCEEDINGS
9 PAGES


SHARE
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top