|
1.INTRODUCTIONIt is known that to understand the behavior of human diseases, one needs to study at cell level. Nowadays scientists from different research fields are converging to unveil the relation between the structural and functional design of cells, how cells respond to environmental challenges, normal processes, such as cell cycle and differentiation, and abnormal processes like neoplastic transformations. However, the interior of a living cell is a complex environment, which is not easy to study1. In this regard, some mechanical models have been developed to characterize mechanical responses of living cells2, and it is possible to observe some relation between cell metabolism and human diseases3. It has been shown that cells response to stress, through sensors inside the nucleus4. In addition, it is possible to use the morphological changes of cells, to classify neoplastic transformations related with specific diseases5-6 and it has been established how cell metabolism play an important role in brain function and development7. The nucleus is particularly dynamic8, and in the case of nucleolus, its regulation has a spatio temporal dependence9. Therefore, it is necessary to develop new technologies in order to understand the role of intracellular transport in the inner function of the cell10-14. Regarding to the internal intracellular transport, some studies had measured the velocity of intracellular transport related with the metabolism in the cytoplasm15, as well as some characteristics implied in growth and dynamics12-13,16. In addition, tomographic techniques have been developed to study biological material16-17. Some models of intracellular transport have been developed to research into this topic18, and it is possible to classify this transport inside cells, in passive diffusion and active transport, which requires chemical energy19-20. This study proposes a new technique based on Quantitative Phase Imaging (QPI) to investigate the intracellular transport (active and passive) in living cells. For this, we measured the changes in the refractive index, which are related to the inplane mass transport of the living cell, without the necessity of tracking individual particles for passive transport12-13,21. This method is based on the idea that the measured pathlength fluctuations report on the dry mass transport within the cell22. Hence, it is possible to have access to the dry mass density ρ(x,y) which is proportional to the refractive index; this technique is called Dispersion relation Phase Spectroscopy (DPS)19. 2.METHODOLOGYTo obtain the quantitative phase images we use spatial light interference microscopy (SLIM), a recent optical microscopy technique, capable of measuring nanoscale structures and dynamics in live cells via interferometry21-23. SLIM combines two classic ideas in light imaging: Zernike’s phase contrast microscopy24-25, which renders high contrast intensity images of transparent specimens, and Gabor’s holography [26], where the phase information from the object is recorded. Thus, SLIM reveals the intrinsic contrast of cell structures and, in addition, renders quantitative optical path-length maps across the sample. SLIM is implemented as an add-on module to an existing phase contrast microscope13. We imaged HeLa cells in culture medium under physiological conditions, 37°C and 5% CO2 controls. Figure 1a shows an example of such quantitative phase imaging. Figure 1b illustrates the procedure developed to retrieve the dispersion relation associated with intracellular transport, which is the relationship between the decay rate, Γ, and wave number, q. From the SLIM phase maps, we calculated the dispersion relation, Γ(qx, qy). Thus, we first perform the spatial Fourier transform of each frame, then we calculate the temporal bandwidth, Γ, at each spatial frequency (qx, qy) via the temporal Fourier transform. Then, we azimuthally averaged to obtain the radial function Γ(q) (Fig. 1c). 3.RESULTSTo study the dynamics of intracellular transport in HeLa cells, we acquired SLIM images for a period of 5 minutes, with an acquisition rate of 1 frame every 5 s and a magnification of 40X. We measured DPS over ten HeLa cells and obtained values of velocity for active transport in the cytoplasm and the nucleus. Specifically, the measurements in the cytoplasm show only active transport. The transport in the nucleus shows passive or diffusive transport at high values of wave number, q (fig 2 right). Table 1 shows the standard deviation of velocity and the average diffusion coefficient for ten cells. Table 1.Average velocity and average diffusion coefficient for ten cells. Cytoplasm shows only active transport. Nucleus shows active and passive transport.
4.CONCLUSIONSUsing SLIM to image live cell dynamics and DPS for analysis, we found that the intracellular transport in the cytoplasm is due mainly to active transport. Inside the nucleus, our results revealed a combination of both active and passive transport. The standard deviation velocity related to active transport, is slightly smaller in the nucleus (2.21 ± 6.82x10-1 nm/s) than in the cytoplasm (2.33 ± 2.00x10-1 nm/s). The technique used in this work shows that it is possible to study intracellular transport in living cells without dyes. We anticipate that such studies will reveal new understanding about cell function and disease. Acknowledgements:Silvia Ceballos is grateful to the Administrative Department of Science, Technology and Innovation of the Government of Colombia (Colciencias, http://www.colciencias.gov.co/) and the National University of Colombia at Bogotá for their support along this study. This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grants CBET 08-46660 CAREER, CBET-1040462 MRI), Agilent Laboratories and Phi Optic, Inc. For more information, visit http://light.ece.uiuc.edu/. Competing Interests: Gabriel Popescu has financial interest in Phi Optics, Inc., a company developing quantitative phase imaging technology for materials and life science applications 5.5.REFERENCESB. Alberts, J. H. Wilson and T. Hunt, Molecular biology of the cell, Garland Science, New York
(2008). Google Scholar
C.T. Lim, E.H. Zhoua, S.T. Quek,
“Mechanical models for living cells—a review,”
Journal of Biomechanics, 39 195
–216
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.12.008 Google Scholar
C.T. Lim, E.H. Zhou, A. Li, S.R.K. Vedula, H.X. Fu,
“Experimental techniques for single cell and single molecule biomechanics,”
Materials Science and Engineering C, 26 1278
–1288
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2005.08.022 Google Scholar
Séverine Boulon, Belinda J. Westman, Saskia Hutten, Francois-Michel Boisvert, and Angus I. Lamond,
“The Nucleolus under Stress,”
Molecular Cell, 40 216
–227
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.024 Google Scholar
Koji Okudela, Takuya Yazawa, Nobuo Ogawa,
“Morphometric Profiling of Lung Cancers—Its AssociationWith Clinicopathologic, Biologic, and MolecularGenetic Features,”
Am J Surg Pathol, 34 243
–255
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181c79a6f Google Scholar
Pasquale Memmolo, Lisa Miccio, Francesco Merola, Oriella Gennari, Paolo Antonio Netti, Pietro Ferraro,
“3D morphometry of red blood cells by digital holography,”
Cytometry Part A, 85 1030
–1036
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.v85.12 Google Scholar
Hirokawa,
“Intracellular transport, molecular motors, KIFs and related diseases,”
BMC Genomics, 15
(2), O19
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-S2-O19 Google Scholar
Pederson, Thoru,
“The Nucleus Introduced,”
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 3 a000521
(2011). Google Scholar
Hernandez-Verdun, Danièle,
“Assembly and disassembly of the nucleolus during the cell cycle,”
Nucleus, 2 189
–194
(2011). https://doi.org/10.4161/nucl.2.3.16246 Google Scholar
Marquet, Pierre; Depeursinge, Christian; Magistretti, Pierre J.,
“Review of quantitative phase-digital holographic microscopy: promising novel imaging technique to resolve neuronal network activity and identify cellular biomarkers of psychiatric disorders,”
Neurophoton, 1 020901
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.1.2.020901 Google Scholar
C. Edwards, R. Zhou, S-W Hwang, S. J. McKeown, K. Wang, B. Bhaduri, R. Ganti, P. J. Yunker, A. G. Yodh, J. A. Rogers, L. L. Goddard and G. Popescu,
“Diffraction phase microscopy: monitoring nanoscale dynamics in materials science [Invited],”
Appl. Opt., 53 G33
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.53.000G33 Google Scholar
G. Popescu, T. Ikeda, R. R. Dasari, and M. S. Feld,
“Diffraction phase microscopy for quantifying cell structure and dynamics,”
Opt. Lett., 31 775
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.31.000775 Google Scholar
G Popescu, Quantitative phase imaging of cells and tissues, 385 McGraw-Hill, New York
(2011). Google Scholar
H. Pham, C. Edwards, L. Goddard and G. Popescu,
“Fast phase reconstruction in white light diffraction phase microscopy,”
Appl. Opt., 53 A97
–A101
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.52.000A97 Google Scholar
Mingzhai Sun, Morgane Warte, Eric Cascales, Joshua W. Shaevitz, and Tâm Mignot,
“Motor-driven intracellular transport powers bacterial gliding motility,”
PNAS, 108 7559
–7564
(2011). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1101101108 Google Scholar
HeeSu Byun, Timothy R Hillman, John M Higgins, Monica Diez-Silva, Zhangli Peng, Ming Dao, Ramachandra R Dasari, Subra Suresh, YongKeun Park,
“Optical measurement of biomechanical properties of individual erythrocytes from a sickle cell patient,”
Acta Biomaterialia,
(2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.07.011 Google Scholar
Youngchan Kim, Hyoeun Shim, Kyoohyun Kim, HyunJoo Park, Seongsoo Jang, YongKeun Park,
“Profiling individual human red blood cells using common-path diffraction optical tomography,”
Scientific reports,
(2014). Google Scholar
Bressloff, Paul C.,
“Stochastic models of intracellular transport,”
Reviews of Modern Physics, 85
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.85.135 Google Scholar
Ru Wang, Zhuo Wang, Larry Millet, Martha U.Gillette, A. J. Levine, and Gabriel Popescu,
“Dispersion-relation phase spectroscopy of intracellular transport,”
Optics Express, 19 20571
–20579
(2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.020571 Google Scholar
Samantha Stam, Margaret L. Gardel,
“Cutting through the Noise: The Mechanics of Intracellular Transport,”
Developmental Cell, 30 365
–366
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2014.08.013 Google Scholar
T. Kim, R. Zhou, M. Mir, S. D. Babacan, P. S. Carney, L. L. Goddard and G. Popescu,
“White-light diffraction tomography of unlabeled live cells,”
Nat Photon, 8
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.350 Google Scholar
G. Popescu, Y. Park, N. Lue, C. Best-Popescu, L. Deflores, R. R. Dasari, M. S. Feld, and K. Badizadegan,
“Optical imaging of cell mass and growth dynamics,”
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol, 295 C538
–C544
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00121.2008 Google Scholar
Zhuo Wang, Larry Millet, Mustafa Mir, Huafeng Ding, Sakulsuk Unarunotai, John Rogers, Martha U. Gillette, and Gabriel Popescu,
“Spatial light interference microscopy (SLIM),”
Optics Express, 19 1016
–1026
(2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.001016 Google Scholar
F. Zernike,
“Phase contrast a new method for the microscopic observation of transparent objects,”
Physica, 9 686
–698
(1942). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-8914(42)80035-X Google Scholar
F. Zernike,
“Phase contrast, a new method for the microscopic observation of transparent objects part II,”
Physica, 9 974
–980
(1942). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-8914(42)80079-8 Google Scholar
Gabor, D.,
“A New Microscopic Principle,”
Nature, 161 777
–778
(1948). https://doi.org/10.1038/161777a0 Google Scholar
|