Performance comparison between static and dynamic cardiac CT on perfusion quantitation and patient classification tasks

Michael Bindschadler; Dimple Modgil; Kelley R. Branch; Patrick J. La Riviere; Adam M. Alessio

doi:10.1117/12.2082098

Translator Disclaimer

18 March 2015 Performance comparison between static and dynamic cardiac CT on perfusion quantitation and patient classification tasks

Michael Bindschadler, Dimple Modgil, Kelley R. Branch, Patrick J. La Riviere, Adam M. Alessio

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 9412, Medical Imaging 2015: Physics of Medical Imaging; 941224 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2082098
Event: SPIE Medical Imaging, 2015, Orlando, Florida, United States

Abstract

Cardiac CT acquisitions for perfusion assessment can be performed in a dynamic or static mode. In this simulation study, we evaluate the relative classification and quantification performance of these modes for assessing myocardial blood flow (MBF). In the dynamic method, a series of low dose cardiac CT acquisitions yields data on contrast bolus dynamics over time; these data are fit with a model to give a quantitative MBF estimate. In the static method, a single CT acquisition is obtained, and the relative CT numbers in the myocardium are used to infer perfusion states. The static method does not directly yield a quantitative estimate of MBF, but these estimates can be roughly approximated by introducing assumed linear relationships between CT number and MBF, consistent with the ways such images are typically visually interpreted. Data obtained by either method may be used for a variety of clinical tasks, including 1) stratifying patients into differing categories of ischemia and 2) using the quantitative MBF estimate directly to evaluate ischemic disease severity. Through simulations, we evaluate the performance on each of these tasks. The dynamic method has very low bias in MBF estimates, making it particularly suitable for quantitative estimation. At matched radiation dose levels, ROC analysis demonstrated that the static method, with its high bias but generally lower variance, has superior performance in stratifying patients, especially for larger patients.

Citation Download Citation

Michael Bindschadler, Dimple Modgil, Kelley R. Branch, Patrick J. La Riviere, and Adam M. Alessio "Performance comparison between static and dynamic cardiac CT on perfusion quantitation and patient classification tasks", Proc. SPIE 9412, Medical Imaging 2015: Physics of Medical Imaging, 941224 (18 March 2015); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2082098

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE