You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
24 March 2016Modeling metrology for calibration of OPC models
Optical Proximity Correction (OPC) has continually improved in accuracy over the years by adding more physically based models. Here, we further extend OPC modeling by adding the Analytical Linescan Model (ALM) to account for systematic biases in CD-SEM metrology. The ALM was added to a conventional OPC model calibration flow and the accuracy of the calibrated model with the ALM was compared to the standard model without the ALM using validation data. Without using any adjustable parameters in the ALM, OPC validation accuracy was improved by 5%. While very preliminary, these results give hope that modeling metrology could be an important next step in OPC model improvement.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Chris A. Mack, Ananthan Raghunathan, John Sturtevant, Yunfei Deng, Christian Zuniga, Kostas Adam, "Modeling metrology for calibration of OPC models," Proc. SPIE 9778, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXX, 97781Q (24 March 2016); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2218534