Figure of merit comparison of PP-based electret and PVDF-based piezoelectric polymer energy harvesters

M. Mrlík; S. Leadenham; M. A. AlMaadeed; A. Erturk

doi:10.1117/12.2222283

15 April 2016 Figure of merit comparison of PP-based electret and PVDF-based piezoelectric polymer energy harvesters

M. Mrlík, S. Leadenham, M. A. AlMaadeed, A. Erturk

Proceedings Volume 9799, Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Systems 2016; 979923 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2222283
Event: SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, 2016, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Abstract

The harvesting of mechanical strain and kinetic energy has received great attention over the past two decades in order to power wireless electronic components such as those used in passive and active monitoring applications. Piezoelectric ceramics, such as PZT (lead zirconate titanate), constitute the most commonly used electromechanical interface in vibration energy harvesters. However, there are applications in which piezoelectric ceramics cannot be used due to their low allowable curvature and brittle nature. Soft polymer PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride) is arguably the most popular non-ceramic soft piezoelectric energy harvester material for such scenarios. Another type of polymer that has received less attention is PP (polypropylene) for electret-based energy harvesting using the thickness mode (33- mode). This work presents figure of merit comparison of PP versus PVDF for off-resonant energy harvesting in thickness mode operation, revealing substantial advantage of PP over PVDF. For thickness mode energy harvesting scenarios (e.g. dynamic compression) at reasonable ambient vibration frequencies, the figure of merit for the maximum power output is proportional to the square of the effective piezoelectric strain constant divided by the effective permittivity constant. Under optimal conditions and for the same volume, it is shown that PP can generate more than two orders of magnitude larger electrical power as compared to PVDF due to the larger effective piezoelectric strain constant and lower permittivity of the former.

Citation Download Citation

M. Mrlík, S. Leadenham, M. A. AlMaadeed, and A. Erturk "Figure of merit comparison of PP-based electret and PVDF-based piezoelectric polymer energy harvesters", Proc. SPIE 9799, Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Systems 2016, 979923 (15 April 2016); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2222283

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available