You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither SPIE nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the SPIE website.
8 December 2015An evaluation of popular hyperspectral images classification approaches
This work is devoted to the problem of the best hyperspectral images classification algorithm selection. The following algorithms are used for comparison: decision tree using full cross-validation; decision tree C 4.5; Bayesian classifier; maximum-likelihood method; MSE minimization classifier, including a special case – classification by conjugation; spectral angle classifier (for empirical mean and nearest neighbor), spectral mismatch classifier and support vector machine (SVM). There are used AVIRIS and SpecTIR hyperspectral images to conduct experiments.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Andrey Kuznetsov, Vladislav Myasnikov, "An evaluation of popular hyperspectral images classification approaches," Proc. SPIE 9875, Eighth International Conference on Machine Vision (ICMV 2015), 987505 (8 December 2015); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2228602