Open Access
22 October 2024 Quantum leap: observing antiferromagnetic transition in a 3D fermionic Hubbard model with ultracold atoms
Laraib Niaz, Alex Krasnok
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The study by Shao et al.1 marks a critical advancement in quantum simulations by reporting the first experimental observation of the antiferromagnetic (AFM) phase transition in a 3D fermionic Hubbard model (FHM) using ultracold lithium-6 atoms. This experiment bridges a significant gap in our understanding of strongly correlated systems and provides a new platform to explore low-temperature quantum phases. This commentary will analyze the results, place them in the context of ongoing research, and discuss their broader implications for the field of quantum materials and technologies.

The study by Shao et al.1 marks a critical advancement in quantum simulations by reporting the first experimental observation of the antiferromagnetic (AFM) phase transition in a three-dimensional (3D) fermionic Hubbard model (FHM) using ultracold lithium-6 atoms. This experiment bridges a significant gap in our understanding of strongly correlated systems and provides a new platform to explore low-temperature quantum phases. This commentary will analyze the results, place them in the context of ongoing research, and discuss their broader implications for the field of quantum materials and technologies.

The FHM2 is fundamental for investigating strongly correlated electron systems, providing insights into phenomena such as metal–insulator transitions and magnetism, both of which are pivotal for future technological innovations such as high-temperature superconductivity.3 Despite the model’s importance, accurately capturing low-temperature phases, particularly antiferromagnetic ordering, remains a challenge due to computational limitations, such as the fermion sign problem, especially in 3D systems. These challenges have hindered theoretical and numerical studies, leaving many open questions about the quantum phases predicted by the model.

Fig. 1

Quantum lattice structure illustrating the fermionic Hubbard model.

AP_6_6_060503_f001.png

Shao et al.1 address these limitations by employing a quantum simulator based on ultracold lithium-6 atoms trapped in a 3D optical lattice. Quantum simulators offer an alternative approach to studying complex quantum systems by mimicking the behavior of strongly correlated fermions in a controlled environment, circumventing the computational challenges that plague traditional methods, such as quantum Monte Carlo simulations.4,5 With ultracold atoms, experimentalists can finely tune parameters, such as temperature and interaction strength, enabling the exploration of quantum phases that have been inaccessible in conventional experiments.

In this experiment, the authors created a 3D optical lattice with 800,000 lattice sites, where lithium-6 atoms were cooled to temperatures low enough for quantum effects to dominate. The ability to manipulate interaction strength through Feshbach resonances and to adjust the system’s doping concentration allowed them to probe the critical conditions for the AFM phase transition. Bragg diffraction measurements were used to monitor the spin structure factor, a key indicator of spin alignment. As the temperature decreased, a sharp increase in the spin structure factor was observed, signaling the onset of long-range AFM order. The transition followed the expected power-law divergence, consistent with predictions from the Heisenberg universality class.

This achievement is notable not just for its experimental elegance but also for its ability to overcome long-standing computational barriers. By observing the AFM phase transition experimentally in 3D, Shao et al. provide a foundation for exploring other low-temperature phases of the Hubbard model, including more exotic quantum states, such as pseudogaps6 and d-wave superconductivity.7 These results have far-reaching implications for understanding high-temperature superconductivity and quantum magnetism, fields that hold promise for transformative applications in energy transmission, quantum computing, and beyond.

While this study represents a significant breakthrough, several challenges and limitations must be addressed in future work. First, the temperatures achieved, while sufficient to observe AFM order, are still not low enough to explore phases like d-wave superconductivity or pseudo-gaps, which require even colder environments. Overcoming this temperature barrier will be critical for fully realizing the potential of quantum simulations in strongly correlated systems. Second, the experiment focuses primarily on half-filling (one atom per lattice site), a configuration that is relatively well understood in the context of the Hubbard model. However, real-world materials, including high-temperature superconductors, exhibit rich and complex behaviors when doped away from half-filling. The effects of doping on the AFM transition were briefly explored but require more detailed investigation to draw meaningful conclusions about their relevance to high-temperature superconductivity. Finite-sized effects also pose challenges. Although the authors mitigate these effects by using a large number of lattice sites, residual finite-sized effects and imperfections in the optical lattice may still influence the precision of the measurements. Future studies should explore methods to reduce these effects, perhaps by employing larger lattice sizes or improving the uniformity of the optical lattice.

The ability to experimentally realize an AFM phase transition in a 3D FHM opens the door to exciting new avenues of research. One promising direction is to extend these experiments to study doped systems in greater detail, particularly near quantum critical points, where novel quantum phases may emerge. Theoretical studies have predicted intriguing phases, such as stripe order and spin-charge separation in doped Hubbard models, and these could be explored using the same quantum simulation techniques. In addition, achieving even lower temperatures will be essential for observing superconducting phases, including d-wave pairing. Reducing disorder in the optical lattice will also be key to achieving more precise measurements and reducing uncertainties due to finite-sized effects. Techniques such as quantum gas microscopy could provide additional insights by allowing single-site resolution of atom positions and spin configurations, further refining our understanding of quantum phases in strongly correlated systems.

In conclusion, the work by Shao et al. represents a major step forward in quantum simulations of the FHM. By providing the first experimental observation of the AFM phase transition in a 3D system, this study not only overcomes significant computational hurdles but also paves the way for future investigations into more exotic quantum phases. As the experimental techniques continue to improve, we can expect quantum simulations to play an increasingly important role in unraveling the mysteries of strongly correlated electron systems, with profound implications for the development of quantum technologies.

References

1. 

H.-J. Shao et al., “Antiferromagnetic phase transition in a 3D fermionic Hubbard model,” Nature, 632 (8024), 267 –272 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07689-2 (2024). Google Scholar

2. 

J. Hubbard, “Electron correlations in narrow energy bands,” Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci., 276 (1365), 238 –257 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1963.0204 (1963). Google Scholar

3. 

P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa and X.-G. Wen, “Doping a Mott insulator: physics of high-temperature superconductivity,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 78 (1), 17 –85 https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.78.17 RMPHAT 0034-6861 (2006). Google Scholar

4. 

M. Xu et al., “Frustration- and doping-induced magnetism in a Fermi–Hubbard simulator,” Nature, 620 (7976), 971 –976 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06280-5 (2023). Google Scholar

5. 

J. O. Austin et al., “Quantum critical dynamics in a spinor Hubbard model quantum simulator,” Commun. Phys., 4 (1), 61 https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-021-00562-y (2021). Google Scholar

6. 

T. Timusk and B. Statt, “The pseudogap in high-temperature superconductors: an experimental survey,” Reports Prog. Phys., 62 (1), 61 –122 https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/62/1/002 (1999). Google Scholar

7. 

D. J. Scalapino, E. Loh and J. E. Hirsch, “d-wave pairing near a spin-density-wave instability,” Phys. Rev. B, 34 (11), 8190 –8192 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.34.8190 (1986). Google Scholar

Biography

Laraib Niaz: Biography is not available.

Alex Krasnok is an assistant professor at Florida International University, specializing in photonics, quantum optics, and electrodynamics. His research covers quantum photonics, metamaterials, and complex-frequency excitations. He has co-authored over 150 journal papers and earned awards like the Leopold B. Felsen Award (2024) and the Early-Career Award in Nanophotonics (2021). Previously, he held positions at ITMO University, the University of Texas at Austin, and CUNY’s Advanced Science Research Center. He became an IEEE Senior Member in 2024.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE and CLP under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Laraib Niaz and Alex Krasnok "Quantum leap: observing antiferromagnetic transition in a 3D fermionic Hubbard model with ultracold atoms," Advanced Photonics 6(6), 060503 (22 October 2024). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.6.6.060503
Received: 19 September 2024; Accepted: 26 September 2024; Published: 22 October 2024
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
3D modeling

Quantum modeling

Chemical species

Quantum systems

Quantum experiments

Systems modeling

Quantum simulation

Back to Top