Open Access
1 March 2005 Erratum: Simple peak shift analysis of time-of-flight data with a slow instrumental response function
Goro Nishimura, Mamoru Tamura
Author Affiliations +

In this paper, which was published in the Journal of Biomedical Optics, Volume 10(1), 014016, (January/February 2005), Fig. 4 contained errors in the legends. The correct figure appears below.

Figure 4

Peak times of the simulated TRF and the difference of broadened TRFs from the ideal ones. (a) shows the peak times of the broadened TRFs and ideal ones. Thick and thin lines are the results with μa=0.01 and 0.05 mm−1, respectively. The open and filled symbols denote 0.1 and 0.5 ns in the width of the instrumental response function, respectively. Solid lines denote the peak of the ideal response function. The dashed and broken lines fit the peaks of TRFs to the ideal peaks with a constant offset. The data with μa=0.01 mm −1 are plotted with an offset of 0.2 ns to avoid overlap of the curves in the figure. (b) shows the difference from the ideal curve. Each symbol shows the results of the simulation with the same parameters as in (a). The lines show the constant offsets.

523502j.4.jpg
©(2005) Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
Goro Nishimura and Mamoru Tamura "Erratum: Simple peak shift analysis of time-of-flight data with a slow instrumental response function," Journal of Biomedical Optics 10(2), 029801 (1 March 2005). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1925651
Published: 1 March 2005
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
Back to Top