In this paper, which was published in the Journal of Biomedical Optics, Volume 10(1), 014016, (January/February 2005), Fig. 4 contained errors in the legends. The correct figure appears below.
Figure 4
Peak times of the simulated TRF and the difference of broadened TRFs from the ideal ones. (a) shows the peak times of the broadened TRFs and ideal ones. Thick and thin lines are the results with
μa=0.01
and 0.05 mm−1, respectively. The open and filled symbols denote 0.1 and 0.5 ns in the width of the instrumental response function, respectively. Solid lines denote the peak of the ideal response function. The dashed and broken lines fit the peaks of TRFs to the ideal peaks with a constant offset. The data with
μa=0.01 mm
−1
are plotted with an offset of 0.2 ns to avoid overlap of the curves in the figure. (b) shows the difference from the ideal curve. Each symbol shows the results of the simulation with the same parameters as in (a). The lines show the constant offsets.