Open Access
21 January 2013 In vivo confocal microscopy in dermatology: from research to clinical application
Martina Ulrich, Susanne Lange-Asschenfeldt
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) represents an emerging technique for the noninvasive histomorphological analysis of skin in vivo and has shown its applicability for dermatological research as well as its value as an adjunct tool in the clinical management of skin cancer patients. Herein, we aim to give an overview on the current clinical indications for CLSM in dermatology and also highlight the diverse applications of CLSM in dermatological research.

1.

Introduction

Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) represents an emerging technique for the noninvasive histomorphological analysis of skin in vivo. In the past decade, various studies have shown the applicability of in vivo reflectance CLSM for the noninvasive diagnosis of melanocytic skin lesions as well as nonmelanoma skin cancer. Furthermore, CLSM has been used for the evaluation of benign inflammatory skin diseases.

Recently, novel devices combining the standard confocal laser scanning microscopy in reflectance mode with multi-laser fluorescence techniques have been used for clinical studies.1

In addition, ex vivo set-ups allow for the evaluation of biopsy specimens enabling rapid evaluation of tumor margins in Mohs’ micrographic surgery.

Herein, we aim to give an overview of established CLSM techniques for in vivo diagnosis of skin disease, including a brief outlook on emerging CLSM systems currently under investigation.

2.

History and Technical Principle of CLSM

In 1955, Marvin Minsky described the optical principle of confocal laser scanning microscopy at Harvard University in Boston, Massachusetts.2 However, this innovative technology was only published as a patent and remained more or less unrecognized until the 1990s, when Rajadhyaksha et al. first conceived reflectance mode CLSM for skin imaging in its current design.3 Since then, continued technical innovations decreased the size of the machine, thus facilitating the imaging process. Nowadays, handheld devices are available, which can be used for rapid in vivo examination, facilitating evaluations in difficult anatomic areas and also at the bedside.

The technical principle of CLSM is based on the illumination of a small spot within the tissue using a point light source. Reflected light is guided through a pinhole in front of the detector. Thus, only reflected light from the tissue spot, which is in-focus, is used for image generation, whereas light coming from out-of focus planes is eliminated. Horizontal movement of the objective obtains parallel sections of the skin. Endogeneous chromophores in the skin are responsible for the differences in reflectivity, which results in gray scale images. Of these, melanin represents the skin structure with the highest refractive index and therefore provides the highest contrast by CLSM. On CLSM images, melanin-containing cells (both pigmented keratinocytes and melanocytes) appear white. But also other skin structures such as keratin, collagen, or haemoglobin are natural contrast agents.

3.

Application of In Vivo CLSM for Skin Cancer Diagnosis

Early diagnosis of skin cancer represents the most important factor in the management of the increasing skin cancer burden and may significantly reduce mortality and morbidity of the patients. Most skin cancers can be cured by simple excision when diagnosed at an early evolving stage. This particularly applies to melanoma as its prognosis is directly correlated with anatomic depth of invasion.4 However, also in nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSC), such as basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, early diagnosis is essential for positive therapeutic outcome, prognosis, and cosmesis. Although these tumors rarely metastasize, they are often located in cosmetic sensitive areas of the face and scalp where larger excisions may give rise to disfiguring scars and healing impairment. In the past decade, a number of noninvasive treatment modalities have become available, thus optimizing the therapeutic management for selected subtypes of NMSC. In that regard, it has been suggested that noninvasive diagnostic techniques such as in vivo CLSM may be applied for therapeutic monitoring and follow-up.

Despite the great potential of CLSM, it also has limitations, mainly including the restricted penetration depth. Furthermore, the evaluation of a skin lesion by CLSM requires 5 to 10 min and is therefore more time consuming than clinical evaluation or dermoscopy alone. Due to the horizontal images of CLSM, early invasion of skin tumors may be very difficult to diagnose as the basement membrane cannot be visualized. Lastly, the interpretation of CLSM images requires training and experience of the observer as it is the case with every diagnostic technique (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Representative RCM images (500×500μm) illustrating specific patterns of different skin tumors. (a) An RCM image of a melanoma with large atypical nucleated cells (black arrows) in the epidermis, representing widespread pagetoid spread of atypical melanocytes. (b) An RCM image of a benign nevus with the presence of small round cells of bright reflectance at the dermo-epidermal junction. A ringed pattern with well-edged papillae (white arrows) and a cobble stone pattern of the overlying epidermis can be noted. (c) The typical cerebriform pattern of the epidermis in seborrheic keratosis. Areas of epidermis with pigmented keratinocytes (black arrows) and invaginations filled with keratin can be noted (white asterisks). (d) A typical pattern of a basal cell carcinoma with the presence of tumor islands (white dashed circle) consisting of elongated cells with palisading in the periphery. Between the BCC tumor islands and the surrounding fibrous stroma small cleft-like spaces (white asterisk) can be noted that correspond to mucin deposition. Dilated blood vessels (BV) can be seen in the surrounding stroma. (e) Illustrates the atypical honeycomb pattern of an actinic keratosis, different size and shape of keratinocytes can be noted (pleomorphism). (f) Shows an RCM image of an invasive squamous cell carcinoma illustrating tumor islands with central bright center (black dashed circle) located in the upper dermis corresponding to keratinization (black asterisk).

JBO_18_6_061212_f001.png

3.1.

Melanoma

Different types of melanoma can be distinguished, including superficial spreading melanoma (SSM), lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM), nodular melanoma (NM), and acrolentiginous melanoma (ALM). Of these, SSM represents the most common type, accounting for about 70% of all melanomas diagnosed. NM is the second most common form and diagnosis is often challenging as the tumor arises on normal skin and clinical algorithms like the “ABCD” rule usually fail to obtain the diagnosis in early stages. Furthermore, the tumors lack a horizontal growth phase and vertical spread occurs at an early stage, resulting in higher metastatic potential. In contrast, LMM occurs on chronically sun-exposed skin of the elderly often showing a prolonged horizontal growth phase. However, clinical as well as histopathological diagnosis of LMM may be difficult to obtain in the background of actinic damage with the presence of multiple solar lentigines. As in vivo CLSM offers the possibilty of evaluating skin tumors noninvasively and with near-histological resolution, the use of CLSM for melanoma and its differential diagnosis has been the subject of extensive research in this field. Earlier studies have focused on the correlation of CLSM features of melanoma and naevi with histology58 and showed the reproducibility of histological criteria such as pagetoid spread and typical nests of melanocytes by RCM. Since then, multiple studies have evaluated the applicability of RCM for the diagnosis of melanoma and equivocal pigmented lesions913 and it has been shown by Pellacani et al. that CLSM may improve the diagnostic specificity and may thus reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies of benign lesions. In 2007, Pellacani et al. described the RCM features of epidermal disarray, pagetoid cells in the epidermis, nonedged papillae, cellular atypia at the junction, atypical nests, and bright nucleated cells in the dermis as being associated with melanoma.9 Based on these criteria, a score was developed that included two major criteria, each scored 2 points (nonedged papillae, cellular atypia), and 4 minor criteria, each scored one point (roundish pagetoid cells, widespread pagetoid infiltration, cerebriform nests and nucleated cells in the dermis). A total RCM score 3 showed a sensitivity of 91.6% and a specificity of 69.3% for the diagnosis of melanoma. Furthermore, the two step method was proposed by Segura et al.14 The two-step method described four features that distinguished melanocytic lesions from nonmelanocytic lesions including cobblestone pattern of epidermal layers, pagetoid spread, mesh appearance of the dermoepidermal junction, and the presence of dermal nests as criteria for melanocytic lesions. In the second step of the algorithm, two protective criteria were identified (typical basal cells, edged papillae) and scored minus one and two high risk criteria (roundish pagetoid cells, atypical nucleated dermal cells) were scored plus one. A lesion with total score of 0 to 2 was indicative to be most probable melanoma, with a sensitivity and specificity of 86.1% and 95.3%, respectively. Very recently, a large study on 710 consecutive cases analyzed the sensitivity and specificity of two algorithms for the diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and melanoma (MM).15 In this study, the diagnostic accuracy for the BCC algorithm was 100% sensitivity and 88.5% specificity. The MM algorithm showed a sensitivity of 87.6% and a specificity of 70.8%. Interestingly, the four melanomas that were misdiagnosed by the RCM method were of nevoid subtype on histopathological examination. In conclusion, RCM is applicable for the diagnosis of melanoma, showing good sensitivity and specificity values. However, rare subtypes of melanoma (nevoid melanoma, spitzoid melanoma) represent a potential pitfall that needs to be considered. Careful clinical and dermoscopy correlation of the lesion is beneficial and doubtful cases need to be excised for histopathological examination [Fig. 2(a)].

Fig. 2

(a) The CLSM criteria of melanocytic and (b) nonmelanocytic skin tumors including diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms for the most common entities.

JBO_18_6_061212_f002.png

3.2.

Basal Cell Carcinoma

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) represents the most common skin cancer in humans and typically arises on chronically sun-exposed skin. A number of different subtypes can be distinguished that vary regarding the clinical presentation and include among others nodular, superficial, pigmented, and sclerosing type of BCC. On histological examination BCCs are characterized by tumor aggregates consisting of basophilic cells that typically show a rim of elongated palisading cells in the periphery and that are separated from the surrounding stroma by clefts. In vivo RCM has early been used to investigate features of basal cell carcinoma16,17 and in 2004 a multicenter study evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of five independent parameters, including architectural alteration and cellular pleomorphism of the overlying epidermis, areas of refratile tumor cells with longated, monomorphic nuclei, nuclear polarization, increased dermal vasulature, and prominent inflammatory infiltrate.18 In this study, the identification of two or more criteria showed a sensitivity for BCC diagnosis of 100%, whereas the presence of four or more criteria showed a sensitivity of 82.9% and a specificity of 95.7%. Further studies have described RCM features of pigmented BCC that includes the additional presence of dendritic cells within tumor nodules of BCC19 and have analyzed the applicability of RCM for monitoring of treatment response to imiquimod and cryotherapy as well as the applicability of RCM as an adjunct tool to Moh’s micrographic surgery.20,21 As already mentioned above, a recent study confirmed the high diagnostic accuracy of RCM for the diagnosis of BCC, showing a 100% sensitivity and 88.5% specificity for the proposed BCC algorithm by Guitera et al.15

4.

Actinic Keratosis, Bowen’s Disease, and Invasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Actinic keratosis (AK), Bowen’s disease (BD), and invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) represent a continuum of a disease process in actinically damaged skin. AK and BD share histological and molecular genetic features of invasive SCC, but are limited to the epidermis.22 As both AK and BD represent superficial forms of skin cancer they seem most suitable for RCM evaluation. However, these lesions are also often characterized by the presence of hyperkeratotic scale that may impair image resolution and diagnostic accuracy. In invasive SCC, prominent hyperkeratosis may significantly interfere with the imaging of underlying structures.

A preliminary study by Aghassi et al. in 2000 already described the presence of hyperkeratosis, lower epidermal nuclear enlargement and pleomorphism, and architectural disarray as features of AK in a limited subset of patients.23 Larger studies performed by three independent groups have shown the applicability of RCM for the diagnosis of nonhyperkeratotic AKs.2426 Ulrich et al. analyzed 46 AKs and reported the presence of architectural disarray and cellular pleomorphism as the best predictor for AK; sensitivity and specificity values in this study ranged from 80% to 98.6%. In the study by Ahlgrimm-Siess et al., 30 actinic keratoses were analyzed and a sensitivity of 93.34% and specificity of 88.34% could be achieved by two clinical dermatooncologists (positive predictive value 88.94%, negative predictive value 93.15%). A one-step algorithm was proposed by the authors, which was based on only one criterion (irregular keratinocyte cell borders) and allowed a correct diagnosis in 86.67% of actinic keratoses and 85% of normal skin. In a further study, Rishpon et al. analyzed 7 AKs, 25 SCCs in situ, 3 invasive SCCs, and 3 keratoacanthomas and described the presence of an atypical honeycomb or a disarranged pattern of the spinous-granular layer, round nucleated cells at the spinous-granular layer, and round blood vessels traversing through the dermal papilla as key RCM features of SCC. The features of architectural disarray and cellular polymorphism that has been used in earlier studies correlate to the feature of atypical honeycomb pattern that represents the most important feature for RCM diagnosis of AK. Recent studies have also evaluated RCM for monitoring of AKs during treatment and for the assessment of treatment response,27 indicating the applicability of RCM for this indication [Fig. 2(b)].

5.

Application of In Vivo CLSM for Dermatological Research

The noninvasive nature of CLSM allows evaluations of skin sites over time, thus enabling the investigation of dynamic physiological or pathological skin processes in vivo and at different timepoints. A number of investigations of normal and diseased skin in vivo have analyzed the reaction patterns to exogenous stimuli such as UV-radiation, contact irritants, and superficial skin wounds. Owing to the advantage of CLSM to analyze skin and its appendages in its native state, any assessment may be made with no further tissue alteration or processing.

5.1.

Contact Dermatitis

Contact allergies are of high relevance in occupational and clinical dermatology as well as cosmetic research, such that accurate diagnosis is of utmost importance. The gold standard of diagnosis is the clinical evaluation of patch tests, however, accuracy of test results ranges from 75% to 85%, still yielding a substantial number of false positive/negative test results. Furthermore, there is a limited availability and suitability of experimental in vitro or ex vivo test kits to increase diagnostic accuracy. This has prompted further research for noninvasive, diagnostic tools for in vivo analysis of patch-test sites. González and his group were the first to describe the CLSM features of contact dermatitis (CD) in vivo and noninvasively.28 Thereby, features such as spongiosis, vesicle formation, exocytosis, and parakeratosis have been defined and correlated with routine histology. It was shown that CLSM may aid in the distinction of allergic (ACD) and irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) in vivo based on features seen upon CLSM evaluation.29 The most characteristic feature of ICD was the disruption of the corneal layer by exogenously applied irritants. Epidermal spongiosis and exocytosis on the other hand were comparable for both ACD and ICD after correcting for clinical score.

Investigations were continued to evaluate the kinetic evolution of ACD and ICD over time.30 The main differences included a prolonged activity of ACD compared to ICD, whereas ICD presented with features of intraepidermal necrosis as well as superficial disruption.30 Furthermore, ethnic variability in skin response following contact with a common household irritant has been analyzed. Following exposure to increasing concentrations of a common household irritant (Ivory Soap™ dishwashing liquid) serial clinical and CLSM evaluations were performed at 24 and 48 h. Thereby, individual irritancy levels were determined for the two subgroups, being 10% for Caucasians and 25% for African-Americans. Interestingly, it was shown that CLSM was able to detect features of irritancy (i.e., parakeratosis, detachment of keratinocytes) in patients with no clinical signs of ICD. Following CLSM analysis, selected features such as spongiosis, parakeratosis, and disruption of the stratum corneum were more severe for Caucasians, indicating a higher susceptibility to irritants compared to African-Americans.31,32 Overall these findings suggest a superior barrier function in African-Americans compared to Caucasians.

Another study performed a sensitivity/specificity analysis of CLSM compared to the gold standard, i.e., the clinical evaluation of patch tests.33 Following the clinical evaluation of allergic patch test sites at 72 h, specificity/sensitivity values for respective CLSM features ranged from 92.6% to 100%. The highest sensitivity/specificity were determined for spongiosis and exocytosis of the granular and spinous layer. Interestingly, CLSM was able to visualize features of ACD in the absence of clinical findings, thereby detecting subclinical disease (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

Representative RCM images of (a) to (c) biopsy proven eczema and (d) to (f) psoriasis. Part (a) was obtained at the stratum corneum showing areas of parakeratosis (red dashed circle). (b) The presence of spongiotic microvesicles corresponding to dark nonrefractive spaces on RCM (white asterisk). Furthermore. small bright cells can be noted that correspond to inflammatory cells (white arrow). (c) RCM images at the DEJ with the presence of inflammatory cells (white arrow). (d) Respective images of parakeratosis (red dashed circle) and single detached corneocytes (white arrows) in a psoriatic plaque. (e) The honeycomb pattern of the epidermis. (f) Papillomatosis (red dashed circle) as present in psoriasis at the DEJ. Dilated blood vessels can be observed in the center of the papillae (white arrows).

JBO_18_6_061212_f003.png

5.2.

CLSM Application for Cosmetic Research

With an increasing interest in the research and development of cosmetic and skin care products for the purpose of anti-aging, sun-care, and UV-protection, there is an increased need for noninvasive analysis for their efficacy, tolerabilibity, and physiological properties in human skin. Such tests involve an assessment of general toxicity, eye and skin irritancy, phototoxicity, and mutagenicity. The majority of products rely on a series of ex vivo test models, including artificial skin models, cell cultures, or in vitro assays. While their results may be reproducible, their actual applicability to live human skin has been a subject of controversial discussion. At the same time, animal studies for the purpose of cosmetic industry related research are to be avoided for ethical reasons. In 2009, the European Union (EU) agreed to initiate a near-total ban on the sale of animal-tested cosmetics throughout the EU, and to interdict all cosmetics-related animal testing. In that context it has been proposed that CLSM may be suitable for in vivo assessment of topographic, morphological assessment of physiological and pathological skin response to topically applied products. Since CLSM offers the opportunity to determine the kinetics of topically applied substances with an immediate assessment of local cutaneous changes, CLSM may be a useful tool for dermatological cosmetic research.34,35

6.

Skin Aging

First investigations using CLSM for analysis of skin aging were performed by Sauermann et al. comparing volar forearm skin of young and older individuals.36 Thereby, a significant increase in epidermal thickness was shown for the older group, associated with a significant decrease in the number of dermal papillae per area. The younger group on the other hand demonstrated an increased thickness of the granular layer, while the overall thickness of the stratum corneum showed no difference between the two groups.

In the same line of research, Wurm et al.37 have performed a comprehensive analysis of chronological and photoaged skin using CLSM. They have shown, that CLSM permits a characterization and quantification of histomorphometric features of epidermal and papillary dermis as a sign of skin aging. Among 21 features analyzed, 15 were shown to be significant for quantification of skin aging. Among others, dermal papillary index (number of papillae/mm2), the thickness of the basal layer, and an increased thickness of the granular layer permit a semiquantitative grading.37 These changes were found to be more pronounced with increasing age, and were also associated with changes in the underlying microvasculature.

Another study by Lagarrigue et al.38 used CLSM to quantify epidermal pigmentation and density of dermal papilla in correlation with age and skin phototype. Following an analysis of 111 healthy female volunteers, it was shown that papillary contrast at the level of the dermo-epidermal junction correlated strongly with skin pigmentation assessed clinically using the Fitzpatrick skin phototype classification. While the first studies on the detection and distribution of melanin and melanocytes have been performed as early as 2005,39,40 these findings are also confirmatory of a preliminary study by Antoniou et al., first analyzing pigment distribution in correlation with the Fitzpatrick classification.41 With respect to skin pigmentation, a number of studies have been aimed at analyzing the process of immediate and delayed pigment darkening reactions and their respective association with skin microvasculature.42

Further analyses have focused on the therapeutic effects of topically applied antioxidants such as Vit-C for skin aging.43 These investigations have shown that five weeks of topical Vit-C application resulted in a significant increase in dermal papillary density, compared to vehicle treated control. RCM was able to show a restoration of the dermoepidermal junction in young skin, and an increase in density of capillaries within dermal papillae in aged skin compared with untreated control. These longitudinal studies illustrate the opportunity of CLSM to monitor treatment response and local skin reaction as well as dynamic events of skin repair and regeneration.

7.

Cosmetic and Medical Laser Treatment

Longo et al.44 performed a systematic analysis of local effects of epidermal and dermal changes following laser skin rejuvenation using a fractionated CO 2 laser in an ablative mode including 10 female volunteers. Following a single treatment with a radiofrequency excited ultrapulsed CO 2 laser device, four serial CLSM evaluations were performed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 weeks after treatment. After blinded image analysis, it was shown that CLSM was able to document a disappearance of mottled pigmentation as a feature of skin dyspigmentation in photoaged skin. Furthermore, collagen remodeling was described by the appearance of newly formed collagen at week 3, seen as bright, straight fibers in parallel arrangement throughout the entire CLSM mosaic and persisting at the 12 weeks evaluation timepoint.

Xu et al. have used CLSM for monitoring and follow-up of laser treatment for infraorbital dark circles using a low-fluence Q-switched 1,064-nm laser.45 The results of this investigation showed a dramatic decrease of melanin deposition in the upper dermis as seen by CLSM evaluation.

Other studies using laser treatment have evaluated the applicability of CLSM for follow up of cherry angioma treated by pulsed dye laser (PDL) in vivo.46 Thereby, the disappearance of dilated capillary loops after PDL treatment was shown using CLSM. Aghassi et al. have also used CLSM for monitoring of PDL treatment for sebaceous hyperplasia.47 A cohort of 10 patients with a total of 29 lesions were treated by PDL followed by serial confocal evaluations at baseline and follow-up up to eight weeks post treatment. CLSM was able to visualize the morphological and vascular aspects of dynamic treatment response, including a coagulation of blood vessels and consecutive (partial) regression of sebacious lesions.48

Yamashita et al. have reported on a series of subjects with benign, superficial pigmented skin lesions on the face of Asian volunteers, treated by serial sessions of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy.49 CLSM was used to document lesions at baseline, as well as monitor treatment response including crusting, migration of melanosomes, and overall melanocyte activity. The authors have come to the conclusion that CLSM is suitable to monitor the removal of superficial melanosomes from the basal layer, while leaving overall melanocyte activity intact.

8.

Conditions with Exogenous/Endogenous Pigment Alterations/Decorative Tattoo

CLSM may be useful for evaluation of tattoo-related skin alterations. CLSM was able to visualize subepidermal deposits of dense, clustered pigment granules of up to about 3 μm in size corresponding to black tattoos, while red, blue, and green tattoos present on CLSM with a more scarce and diffuse appearance. Thereby, it was postulated that CLSM may be a potentially useful tool for evaluation of laser tattoo removal as well as monitoring skin repair after laser therapy.34,50

9.

Melasma

Melasma is a common pigmentary facial skin disorder caused by abnormal melanin deposits. Kang et al. were the first to analyze a total of 29 patients with a clinical diagnosis of melasma using reflectance confocal microscopy,51,52 describing a set of morphological criteria in correlation with routine histology. All patients showed a significant increase in hyperrefractile basal cells, corresponding to hyperpigmented basal keratinocytes. Selected patients showed dendritic cells in the epidermis corresponding to activated melanocytes. At the level of the dermal layer, CLSM identified plump bright cells corresponding to melanophages, a feature that has previously also been described in conjunction with melanocytic skin lesions such as benign and dysplastic nevi.

A preliminary study by Ardigo et al. included a total of (n=15) patients previously diagnosed with facial melasma followed by CLSM analysis of their pigment distribution.52 Furthermore, therapeutic monitoring of skin response to treatment with pyruvic acid and hydroquinone was performed in seven of these patients. The results of this study suggest that by localizing the site and extent of pigment deposits CLSM is a useful technique for the diagnosis and therapeutic follow-up for melasma.

A large cohort of 210 Asian patients was evaluated by CLSM studying the correlation of histological classification of melasma.53 It was shown that CLSM classification of melasma corresponded well with routine histology. CLSM evaluation alone showed the predominant subtype to be epidermal (n=143) followed by the mixed type yielding a total of n=57 patients. These results suggest that CLSM may be a useful tool for the classification of melasma, ultimately facilitating the therapeutic management, follow-up, and prognosis on the therapeutic outcome. Pilot studies evaluating the efficacy of novel formulations for treatment of melasma have shown promising results as to the clinical applicability of CLSM in monitoring treatment response.54

10.

CLSM for Evaluation of UV-Induced Skin Response

Acute and repeated exposure of the skin to ultraviolet radiation results in a series of biological responses, including erythema, immediate and delayed pigment darkening, tanning, and skin color changes among the major ones. Chronic overexposure to UV radiation gives rise to genetic alterations, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis of keratinocytes, resulting in the development of photocarcinogenesis, photoaging, and the occurence of photoallergic and photoimmunologic skin responses.

While comprehensive research has been performed on UVA-induced skin pigmentation and associated vascular changes, the specific events remain to be elucidated. Due to procedural limitations of serial histological studies, it was suggested that noninvasive imaging techniques may aid in the investigation of dynamic skin changes following UVA exposure including the evaluation of associated changes in blood flow.39,42,55

Yamashita et al. performed an evaluation with 27 volunteers (Fitzpatrick skin phototype SPT II-VI).42 Following irradiation with a solar simulator, UVA-induced tanning response was evaluated by CLSM. The influence of reactive vasodilatation on immediate pigment darkening (IPD) development was examined with the addition of epinephrine this inducing vasoconstriction. Thereby, the authors have shown that CLSM detects increased capillary flow immediately after UVA radiation. One week after irradiation an increased melanization of the basal layer was observed, whereby CLSM allowed the visualization of activated melanocytes in vivo. The addition of epinephrine was able to partially inhibit the delayed darkening response, suggesting a role for reactive vasodilation in the consecutive events following UVA exposure.

Gambichler et al. used CLSM to assess the photoadaptive effects of repeated sunbed exposures on epidermal thickness, cell size, and epidermal pigmentation.55 Eight volunteers were included in this study, receiving repeated sunbed exposures within a three-week period and compared to an unexposed/protected control site followed by CLSM evaluation 24 h after the last UVA-exposure. The results showed a significant increase in the thickness of the stratum corneum compared to unexposed control. There was a trend towards increased epidermal thickness, however, findings did not reach levels of significance. The size of granular keratinocytes was significantly larger in exposed versus unexposed skin and epidermal melanin content was significantly higher for UVA-exposed skin.

In that regard, a number of research studies have been aimed at the prevention of sun-induced skin changes, employing primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention strategies. Topically applied protective formulations include chemical compounds as well as physical absorbers, while systemic chemopreventive strategies have evaluated protective properties of natural antioxidants, and the administration of supplemental vitamins, plant extracts, and nutritional compounds.

For the assessment of protective properties of sunscreen formulations, the evaluation of minimal erythema dose (MED) has been established in dermatological research, allowing to grade the ability of a compound to protect against sunburns. Since MED is assessed by visual inspection, there is a high inter-, and intraobserver variability even when implementing reflectometric and chromometric methods.5658

Gambichler et al. have performed a correlative study evaluating the dynamic skin changes following exposure to a solar simulator at 1×MED and 3×MED using CLSM in a total of 10 volunteers.59 The findings of this study showed an increase in epidermal thickness, the presence of spongiosis and an increased pigmentation of the basal layer in a dose/time-dependent manner. In addition, CLSM allowed the visualization of reactive vasodilatation of dermal capillaries.

Ulrich et al. performed an evaluation on cutaneous changes following UVB-irradiation, including the evaluation a commercially available sunscreen compared to untreated control.60 A total of five patients Fitzpatrick SPT II and III were enrolled in this pilot study, followed by irradiation of the volar forearm using a commercially available UVB light source with five gradually increasing dosages, whereby test sites with sunscreens were compared to contralateral controls receiving no sunscreen. Clinical and CLSM evaluations were performed at four consecutive time points.

The findings of this study showed that CLSM permits the visualization of inflammatory response in vivo, including the visualization of single apoptotic cells (sunburn cells) as well as microvesicle formation. The presence of inflammatory changes and sunburn cells correlated with respective UVB doses and the respective susceptibility (skin phototype) Lastly, it was shown that following the topical application of sunscreen formulations at standard dosage no UVB-induced skin changes were detected using CLSM (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

Representative RCM images of the granular/spinous layer 24 h after irradiation with UV-B (240J/cm2) (a) without sunscreen and (b) after use of sunscreen. (a) The RCM image (500×500μm) illustrates the presence of cells with bright center and dark periphery, corresponding to sunburn cells (white arrow). Furthermore, small microvesicles can be noted (red dashed circle). Part (b) was obtained at the contralateral arm of the same patient after sunscreen application. The RCM image (500×500μm) shows regular honeycomb pattern of the epidermis without any signs of sun damage.

JBO_18_6_061212_f004.png

11.

Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Reflectance confocal microscopy represents a promising technique which has shown its usefulness for a wide range of scientific as well as clinical applications. In the past years, in vivo CLSM has developed from a research tool to a valuable adjunct diagnostic tool providing the opportunity for noninvasive evaluation of skin lesions with histological detail. Thereby, CLSM has become an important part in the evaluation of skin cancer in academic clinical settings as well as specialized outpatient and research centers. Furthermore it allows the noninvasive monitoring of topical therapies as well as an assessment of efficacy for cosmetic products and laser procedures.

References

1. 

E. Sattleret al., “How long does protection last?—in vivo fluorescence confocal laser scanning imaging for the evaluation of the kinetics of a topically applied lotion in an everyday setting,” Skin Res. Technol., 18 (3), 370 –377 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.2012.18.issue-3 SRTEFN 0909-752X Google Scholar

2. 

M. Minsky, “Memoir on inventing the confocal scanning microscope,” Scanning, 10 (4), 128 –138 (1988). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sca.v10:4 SCNNDF 0161-0457 Google Scholar

3. 

M. Rajadhyakshaet al., “In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of human skin: melanin provides strong contrast,” J. Invest. Dermatol., 104 (6), 946 –952 (1995). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jid.1995.104.issue-6 JIDEAE 0022-202X Google Scholar

4. 

C. M. Balchet al., “Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification,” J. Clin. Oncol., 27 (36), 6199 –6206 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4799 JCONDN 0732-183X Google Scholar

5. 

Z. S. Tannouset al., “In vivo examination of lentigo malign and malignant melanoma in situ, lentigo maligna type by near-infrared reflectance confocal microscopy: comparison of in vivo confocal images with histologic sections,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 46 (2), 260 –263 (2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2002.118345 JAADDB 0190-9622 Google Scholar

6. 

G. PellacaniA. M. CesinaroS. Seidenari, “In vivo assessment of melanocytic nests in nevi and melanomas by reflectance confocal microscopy,” Mod. Pathol., 18 (4), 469 –474 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.3800330 MODPEO 0893-3952 Google Scholar

7. 

G. PellacaniA. M. CesinaroS. Seidenari, “In vivo confocal reflectance microscopy for the characterization of melanocytic nests and correlation with dermoscopy and histology,” Br. J. Dermatol., 152 (2), 384 –386 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.2005.152.issue-2 BJDEAZ 1365-2133 Google Scholar

8. 

G. PellacaniA. M. CesinaroS. Seidenari, “Reflectance-mode confocal microscopy for the in vivo characterization of pagetoid melanocytosis in melanomas and nevi,” J. Invest. Dermatol., 125 (3), 532 –537 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jid.2005.125.issue-3 JIDEAE 0022-202X Google Scholar

9. 

A. Gergeret al., “Diagnostic applicability of in vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy in melanocytic skin tumors,” J. Invest. Dermatol., 124 (3), 493 –498 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jid.2005.124.issue-3 JIDEAE 0022-202X Google Scholar

10. 

G. PellacaniA. M. CesinaroS. Seidenari, “Reflectance-mode confocal microscopy of pigmented skin lesions—improvement in melanoma diagnostic specificity,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 53 (6), 979 –985 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2005.08.022 JAADDB 0190-9622 Google Scholar

11. 

G. Pellacaniet al., “The impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnostic accuracy of melanoma and equivocal melanocytic lesions,” J. Invest. Dermatol., 127 (12), 2759 –2765 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.jid.5700993 JIDEAE 0022-202X Google Scholar

12. 

A. Scopeet al., “Remodeling of the dermoepidermal junction in superficial spreading melanoma: insights gained from correlation of dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy, and histopathologic analysis,” Arch. Dermatol., 144 (12), 1644 –1649 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2008.504 ARDEAC 0003-987X Google Scholar

13. 

P. Guiteraet al., “In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy enhances secondary evaluation of melanocytic lesions,” J. Invest. Dermatol., 129 (1), 131 –138 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jid.2008.193 JIDEAE 0022-202X Google Scholar

14. 

S. Seguraet al., “Development of a two-step method for the diagnosis of melanoma by reflectance confocal microscopy,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 61 (2), 216 –229 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2009.02.014 JAADDB 0190-9622 Google Scholar

15. 

P. Guiteraet al., “In vivo confocal microscopy for diagnosis of melanoma and basal cell carcinoma using a two-step method: analysis of 710 consecutive clinically equivocal cases,” J. Invest. Dermatol., 132 (10), 2386 –2394 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jid.2012.172 JIDEAE 0022-202X Google Scholar

16. 

K. Sauermannet al., “Investigation of basal cell carcinoma [correction of carcinoma] by confocal laser scanning microscopy in vivo,” Skin Res. Technol., 8 (3), 141 –147 (2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0846.2002.20345.x SRTEFN 0909-752X Google Scholar

17. 

S. GonzálezZ. Tannous, “Real-time, in vivo confocal reflectance microscopy of basal cell carcinoma,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 47 (6), 869 –874 (2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2002.124690 JAADDB 0190-9622 Google Scholar

18. 

S. Noriet al., “Sensitivity and specificity of reflectance-mode confocal microscopy for in vivo diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma: a multicenter study,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 51 (6), 923 –930 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2004.06.028 JAADDB 0190-9622 Google Scholar

19. 

A. L. Ageroet al., “Reflectance confocal microscopy of pigmented basal cell carcinoma,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 54 (4), 638 –643 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2005.11.1096 JAADDB 0190-9622 Google Scholar

20. 

A. Torreset al., “5% imiquimod cream and reflectance-mode confocal microscopy as adjunct modalities to Mohs micrographic surgery for treatment of basal cell carcinoma,” Dermatol. Surg., 30 (12, Pt. 1), 1462 –1469 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dsu.2004.30.issue-12p1 DESUFE 1076-0512 Google Scholar

21. 

V. Ahlgrimm-Siesset al., “Monitoring efficacy of cryotherapy for superficial basal cell carcinomas with in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy: a preliminary study,” J. Dermatol. Sci., 53 (1), 60 –64 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2008.08.005 JDSCEI 0923-1811 Google Scholar

22. 

R. S. Padillaet al., “Gene expression patterns of normal human skin, actinic keratosis, and squamous cell carcinoma: a spectrum of disease progression,” Arch. Dermatol., 146 (3), 288 –293 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2009.378 ARDEAC 0003-987X Google Scholar

23. 

D. AghassiR. R. AndersonS. González, “Confocal laser microscopic imaging of actinic keratoses in vivo: a preliminary report,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 43 (1, Pt 1), 42 –48 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2000.105565 JAADDB 0190-9622 Google Scholar

24. 

M. Ulrichet al., “Clinical applicability of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of actinic keratoses,” Dermatol. Surg., 34 (5), 610 –619 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.34117.x DESUFE 1076-0512 Google Scholar

25. 

M. Hornet al., “Discrimination of actinic keratoses from normal skin with reflectance mode confocal microscopy,” Dermatol. Surg., 34 (5), 620 –625 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34195.x DESUFE 1076-0512 Google Scholar

26. 

A. Rishponet al., “Reflectance confocal microscopy criteria for squamous cell carcinomas and actinic keratoses,” Arch. Dermatol., 145 (7), 766 –772 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2009.134 ARDEAC 0003-987X Google Scholar

27. 

M. Ulrichet al., “Reflectance confocal microscopy for noninvasive monitoring of therapy and detection of subclinical actinic keratoses,” Dermatology, 220 (1), 15 –24 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000254893 DERMEI 0742-3217 Google Scholar

28. 

S. Gonzálezet al., “Allergic contact dermatitis: correlation of in vivo confocal imaging to routine histology,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 40 (5), 708 –713 (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(99)70151-9 JAADDB 0190-9622 Google Scholar

29. 

K. Swindellset al., “Reflectance confocal microscopy may differentiate acute allergic and irritant contact dermatitis in vivo,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 50 (2), 220 –228 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2003.08.005 JAADDB 0190-9622 Google Scholar

30. 

S. Astneret al., “Non-invasive evaluation of the kinetics of allergic and irritant contact dermatitis,” J. Invest. Dermatol., 124 (2), 351 –359 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.23605.x JIDEAE 0022-202X Google Scholar

31. 

S. P. Hickset al., “Confocal histopathology of irritant contact dermatitis in vivo and the impact of skin color (black vs. white),” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 48 (5), 727 –734 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2003.220 JAADDB 0190-9622 Google Scholar

32. 

S. Astneret al., “Irritant contact dermatitis induced by a common household irritant: a noninvasive evaluation of ethnic variability in skin response,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 54 (3), 458 –465 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2005.11.1099 JAADDB 0190-9622 Google Scholar

33. 

S. AstnerS. GonzálezE. Gonzalez, “Noninvasive evaluation of allergic and irritant contact dermatitis by in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy,” Dermatitis, 17 (4), 182 –191 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.2310/6620.2006.05052 DERMCG 1710-3568 Google Scholar

34. 

S. GonzálezY. Gilaberte-Calzada, “In-vivo refelectance confocal microscopy in clinical dermatology and cosmetology,” Int. J. Cosmet. Sci., 30 (1), 1 –17 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2494.2008.00406.x IJCMDW 0142-5463 Google Scholar

36. 

K. Sauermannet al., “Age related changes of human skin investigated with histometric measurements by confocal laser scanning microscopy in vivo,” Skin Res. Technol., 8 (1), 52 –56 (2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-752x.2001.10297.x SRTEFN 0909-752X Google Scholar

37. 

E. M. Wurmet al., “In vivo assessment of chronological ageing and photoageing in forearm skin using reflectance confocal microscopy,” Br. J. Dermatol., 167 (2), 270 –279 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.2012.167.issue-2 BJDEAZ 1365-2133 Google Scholar

38. 

S. G. Lagarrigueet al., “In vivo quantification of epidermis pigmentation and dermis papilla density with reflectance confocal microscopy: variations with age and skin phototype,” Exp. Dermatol., 21 (4), 281 –286 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0625.2012.01451.x EXDEEY 0906-6705 Google Scholar

39. 

M. A. Middelkamp-Hupet al., “Detection of UV-induced pigmentary and epidermal changes over time using in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy,” J. Invest. Dermatol., 126 (2), 402 –407 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.jid.5700055 JIDEAE 0022-202X Google Scholar

40. 

T. Yamashitaet al., “Non-invasive visualization of melanin and melanocytes by reflectance-mode confocal microscopy,” J. Invest. Dermatol., 124 (1), 235 –244 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jid.2005.124.issue-1 JIDEAE 0022-202X Google Scholar

41. 

C. Antoniouet al., “Analysis of melanin distribution in different ethnic groups by in vivo confocal microscopy,” Laser Phys. Lett., 6 (5), 393 –398 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lapl.200910013 1612-2011 Google Scholar

42. 

T. Yamashitaet al., “In vivo assessment of pigmentary and vascular compartments changes in UVA exposed skin by reflectance-mode confocal microscopy,” Exp. Dermatol., 16 (11), 905 –911 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/exd.2007.16.issue-11 EXDEEY 0906-6705 Google Scholar

43. 

K. Sauermannet al., “Topically applied vitamin C increases the density of dermal papillae in aged human skin,” BMC Dermatol., 4 (1), 13 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-5945-4-13 BDMEC6 1471-5945 Google Scholar

44. 

C. Longoet al., “Laser skin rejuvenation: epidermal changes and collagen remodelling evaluated by in vivo confocal microscopy,” Lasers Med. Sci., (2012). LMSCEZ 0268-8921 Google Scholar

45. 

T. H. Xuet al., “Treatment of infraorbital dark circles using a low-fluence Q-switched 1,064-nm laser,” Dermatol. Surg., 37 (6), 797 –803 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.01956..x DESUFE 1076-0512 Google Scholar

46. 

D. AghassiR. R. AndersonS. González, “Time-sequenced histologic imaging of laser-treated cherry angiomas with in vivo confocal microscopy,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 43 (1), 37 –41 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2000.105560 JAADDB 0190-9622 Google Scholar

47. 

D. Aghassiet al., “Elucidating the pulsed-dye laser treatment of sebaceous hyperplasia in vivo with real-time confocal scanning laser microscopy,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 43 (1), 49 –53 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2000.105566 JAADDB 0190-9622 Google Scholar

48. 

S. Gonzálezet al., “Confocal imaging of sebaceous gland hyperplasia in vivo to assess efficacy and mechanism of pulsed dye laser treatment,” Laser Surg. Med., 25 (1), 8 –12 (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9101 LSMEDI 0196-8092 Google Scholar

49. 

T. Yamashitaet al., “Intensed pulsed light therapy for superficial pigmented lesions evaluated by reflectance confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography,” J. Invest. Dermatol., 126 (10), 2281 –2286 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.jid.5700414 JIDEAE 0022-202X Google Scholar

50. 

K. O’goshiC. SuihkoJ. Serup, “In vivo imaging of intradermal tattoos by confocal scanning laser microscopy,” Skin Res. Technol., 12 (2), 94 –98 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.2006.12.issue-2 SRTEFN 0909-752X Google Scholar

51. 

H. Y. Kanget al., “In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy detects pigmentary changes in melasma at a cellular level resolution,” Exp. Dermatol., 19 (8), 228 –233 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/exd.2010.19.issue-8 EXDEEY 0906-6705 Google Scholar

52. 

M. Ardigoet al., “Characterization and evaluation of pigment distribution and response to therapy in melasma using in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy: a preliminary study,” J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol., 24 (11), 1296 –1303 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.2010.24.issue-11 JEAVEQ 0926-9959 Google Scholar

53. 

H. Liuet al., “Histological classification of melasma with reflectance confocal microscopy: a pilot study in Chinese patients,” Skin Res. Technol., 17 (4), 398 –403 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.2011.17.issue-4 SRTEFN 0909-752X Google Scholar

54. 

K. Tsilikaet al., “A pilot study using reflectance confocal microscopy (CLSM) in the assessment of a novel formulation for the treatment of melasma,” J. Drugs Dermatol., 10 (11), 1260 –1264 (2011). JDDOBA 1545-9616 Google Scholar

55. 

T. Gambichleret al., “Effects of repeated sunbed exposures on the human skin. In vivo measurements with confocal microscopy,” Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed., 20 (1), 27 –32 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ppp.2004.20.issue-1 PPPHEW 0905-4383 Google Scholar

56. 

J. Lock-AndersenH. C. Wulf, “Threshold level for measurement of UV-sensitivity: reproducibility of phototest,” Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed., 12 (4), 154 –161 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phpp.1996.12.issue-4 PPPHEW 0905-4383 Google Scholar

57. 

M. FalkM. IliasC. Anderson, “Interobserver variability in reading of phototest reactions with sharply or diffusely delineated borders,” Skin Res. Technol., 14 (4), 397 –402 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.2008.14.issue-4 SRTEFN 0909-752X Google Scholar

58. 

P. Claryset al., “Skin color measurements: comparison between three instruments: the chromameter®, the DermaSpectrometer® and the Mexameter®,” Skin Res. Technol., 6 (4), 230 –238 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0846.2000.006004230.x SRTEFN 0909-752X Google Scholar

59. 

T. Gambichleret al., “A comparative pilot study on ultraviolet-induced skin changes assessed by noninvasive imaging techniques in vivo,” Photochem. Photobiol., 82 (4), 1103 –1107 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1562/2005-12-21-RA-757 PHCBAP 0031-8655 Google Scholar

60. 

M. Ulrichet al., “Comparison of UV-induced skin changes in sun-exposed vs. sun-protected skin- preliminary evaluation by reflectance confocal microscopy,” Br. J. Dermatol., 161 (S3), 46 –53 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.2009.161.issue-s3 BJDEAZ 1365-2133 Google Scholar
© 2013 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) 0091-3286/2013/$25.00 © 2013 SPIE
Martina Ulrich and Susanne Lange-Asschenfeldt "In vivo confocal microscopy in dermatology: from research to clinical application," Journal of Biomedical Optics 18(6), 061212 (21 January 2013). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.6.061212
Published: 21 January 2013
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 45 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Skin

In vivo imaging

Melanoma

Confocal microscopy

Dermatology

Tumors

Skin cancer

Back to Top