Open Access
29 June 2017 Hyperspectral imaging acousto-optic system with spatial filtering for optical phase visualization
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
We report a method for phase visualization in the images of transparent specimens using analog image processing in incoherent light. The experimental technique is based on adaptive bandpass spatial filtering with an amplitude mask matched with an acousto-optic tunable filter in a telecentric optical system. We demonstrate the processing of microscopic images of unstained and stained histological sections of human thyroid tumor with improved contrast.

1.

Introduction

Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) is a group of methods for acquisition and analysis of spectrally resolved images.13 In this paper, we consider HSI as a technique only for acquisition of a spectral dataset without regarding further digital postprocessing. Different HSI concepts, such as scanning grating or prism (so-called pushbroom) systems,4 tunable monochromatic illumination,5,6 liquid crystal,7,8 and acousto-optic tunable filters (AOTFs),911 are used in biomedical optics. HSI systems can be easily integrated with an optical microscope6,9,11 or with standard endoscopic systems.5,10 Hyperspectral and multispectral imaging have become stable trends in cancer diagnostics during the last decade.5,8,9,1219

One of the actual problems in biomedical optics is label-free imaging and analysis of low-contrast objects, such as live cells and tissue cultures, unstained histological sections, and cytological smears.20 Different spatial filtering techniques have originated from Zernike’s phase-contrast imaging.21 Traditional phase imaging methods include dark-field, phase-contrast, and differential imaging contrast microscopy. They require special illumination units and additional optical filters of the specimen.22 An alternative approach is to apply a spatial filter or a mask in a Fourier plane in the detector part of the optical system that can be used for imaging of phase objects.23,24

Our research focuses on the acousto-optic HSI method because of its high spectral and spatial resolution and adaptivity of the angular transfer function.2530 An AOTF usually is used as a wide-field tunable monochromator. Ultrasound induces a dynamical phase grating in crystal volume, and diffracted wavelength is determined by the frequency of ultrasound.31 Anisotropic Bragg diffraction in birefringent crystals is used in AOTFs. This type of acousto-optic interaction requires linear light polarization at the input and produces orthogonal linear polarization at the output. This is a staring HSI method with fast random-access wavelength tuning, i.e., during each exposure of a two-dimensional (2-D) detector array, the whole scene is captured, and the recorded wavelength can arbitrarily vary from one exposure to another. Typical switching time of an AOTF from one wavelength to another is about 10  μs. Thus, a full HSI dataset acquisition can be as short as a few seconds, which is important for operational diagnostics and real-time surgery assistance.5,8 Recent developments in digital methods of arbitrary ultrasonic field synthesis can be useful for advanced spectral processing by means of AOTFs.32,33 It is also known that image edge enhancement can be effectively performed by AOTFs with coherent object illumination.11,2528,3436

Using the peculiarities of the AOTF transfer function for visualization of phase objects has been proposed and studied by Balakshy et al.2628,34 It has been shown that, unlike the dark-field and the phase-contrast methods, acousto-optic filtering results in intensity at the image plane proportional to the optical phase gradient in the object. The disadvantage of this method is that it works with coherent light only. Applying it to HSI would require a tunable monochromatic illumination unit resulting in modifications of a standard microscope. Moreover, such an approach is not applicable to hyperspectral fluorescence imaging. Other acousto-optic phase imaging techniques include interferometry, which requires a modification of a microscope.37

In this paper, we experimentally demonstrate simultaneous spatial and spectral filtering of images obtained with incoherent light for the purpose of imaging unstained low-contrast objects. We developed an original acousto-optic HSI system that performs in a phase gradient visualization mode of image processing in addition to the conventional tunable selection of transmitted wavelength. The new feature has become available using a special amplitude mask (AM) in the Fourier plane for spatial filtering and an AOTF as a tunable monochromator. A telecentric optical system was used to match transmission of the mask with the transfer function of the AOTF. Our HSI system operates with a commercial bright-field inverted microscope. The system can be used in two modes: (1) conventional HSI data acquisition and (2) bandpass spatial filtering of narrowband diffracted light. The performance of the imaging system is demonstrated with unstained biopsies and histological sections of surgically removed tissue.

2.

Method

One of the common optical schemes of AOTF-based HSI systems is a confocal one.38,39 In this layout, the field is imaged at the AOTF aperture, and the diffracted beam is relayed to the detector array by the secondary optical system. The confocal system provides low aberrations except for longitudinal chromatism. The latter can be compensated for using an apochromatic design of the relay optical system.29 An important property of a confocal system is that the AOTF is placed at the intermediate image plane. The angular spectrum at the detector is a product of the incoming beam spectrum, the transfer function of the optical system, and the AOTF transfer function.21

The proposed optical system used for image filtering in our experiments is shown in Fig. 1. The original beam is a broadband light focused by the microscope at the input plane of the HSI system, z=0. The field lens (FL) corrects the beam path so that the zero spatial frequency of the input beam crosses the optical axis of the system at the front focal plane of the first relay lens (RL1), z=f1. An AM is placed there to suppress low spatial frequencies, i.e., for spatial filtering of the beam. The beam is focused onto the AOTF, and the spatial frequency k at z=4f1 is related to the distance from the axis in the mask plane, r, as

Eq. (1)

k=2πrλf1,
where λ is the wavelength in vacuum and f1 is the focal length of FL and RL1. The optical system is telecentric; therefore, it provides equal phase matching over the AOTF clear aperture. Only a narrow bandwidth of light δλ is diffracted according to the phase matching condition in the AOTF. The diffracted beam at the output is imaged with the second relay lens (RL2). Spatial filtering performance of the optical system is based on matching the transmission of the mask with the AOTF transfer function.

Fig 1

Simplified optical scheme of a confocal telecentric acousto-optic HSI system with spatial filtering. FL, field lens; RL1 and RL2, relay lenses; and hatching indicating the spatial frequencies transmitted by the mask.

JBO_22_6_066017_f001.png

In HSI applications, the noncritical phase matching (NPM) condition in noncollinear AOTFs is usually used.40 Analysis of the AOTF transfer function is based on the concepts of Fourier optics and geometrical consideration of phase mismatch R. Hereinafter, R is a dimensionless product of wave vector difference by interaction length. As follows from the coupled modes equations, the AOTF transfer function Hao(kx,ky) at the optimum coupling coefficient can be expressed as31

Eq. (2)

Hao(kx,ky)=sin[(π/2)1+R2(kx,ky)]1+R2(kx,ky).

In addition to the spatial frequencies kx and ky, the phase mismatch R depends on the optical wavelength λ and the frequency of ultrasound. The maximum of the transfer function is obtained at zero phase mismatch, and |R|=0.8 is the criterion for 3  dB diffraction efficiency drop. The phase mismatch in NPM diffraction geometry is a quadratic function of angular frequencies that provides a wide acceptance angle. A typical numerical aperture of a paratellurite AOTF is 1/10. This feature is used to obtain a high spatial resolution in conventional HSI applications of AOTF. Strictly speaking, an AOTF is not an axially symmetrical optical element; therefore, it can cause astigmatism and angular dispersion.30 However, the angular dispersion is cancelled in the confocal scheme,38 and astigmatism is minimized if the diffracted beam is parallel to the input one.

The phase mismatch and the AOTF transfer function are plotted in Fig. 2. Here, we consider some fixed wavelength λ within the AOTF tuning range. The symmetry of the transfer function is close to circular for typical configurations of AOTFs.11,25,26,28 For this reason, in Fig. 2, only one section of the transfer function along the y-axis (orthogonal to the diffraction plane) is shown. When the frequency of ultrasound is exactly matched at the zero spatial frequency, the NPM condition is satisfied. While increasing the frequency of ultrasound, the mismatch curve is shifted toward negative values, and phase matching occurs at higher spatial frequencies. The loci of phase matching points in the (kx,ky) domain are an oval for a detuned NPM configuration.11,26 To match the input angular spectrum at the AOTF input with a ring-shaped transfer function, we have chosen an AM transmitting light in the area

Eq. (3)

kminλf1/2π<r<kmaxλf1/2π,
where kmin and kmax are the cutoff spatial frequencies. The lower cutoff frequency, kmin, is chosen to block the main maximum of the AOTF transfer function in NPM geometry. The higher cutoff frequency of the mask, kmax, corresponds to the AOTF diffraction angle because higher spatial frequencies are blocked by the output diaphragm after the AOTF to prevent undesirable zero-order flare.

Fig 2

NPM in an AOTF and spatial filtering: (a) phase mismatch, (b) AOTF transfer function, and (c) input angular spectrum filtering by the telecentric AM.

JBO_22_6_066017_f002.png

The calculation results presented in Fig. 2 were obtained for the wavelength λ=633  nm. The NPM condition takes place at the ultrasonic frequency of 132.8 MHz; detuned NPM geometry is at the frequency of 133.1 MHz. The cutoff spatial frequencies kmin and kmax correspond to the mask inner and outer radii of 1.5 and 3.0 mm, respectively, provided the focal length is f1=100  mm.

In contrast to previously reported acousto-optic HSI systems,10,11,29,30,38,39,41 our schemes are based on a spatial filter and a single AOTF as a monochromator in the detection part of the optical scheme. Lower spatial frequencies at |k|<kmin are blocked by the mask, resulting in suppression of uniform background in the image. However, for a fixed mask configuration, the cutoff angular frequencies kmin and kmax are inversely proportional to the wavelength λ according to Eq. (3). In the AOTF, only a narrow spectral bandwidth δλ is diffracted according to the phase matching condition. As a result, the angular spectrum of filtered light at the CCD contains only those spatial frequencies that lay between the cutoff frequencies for the diffracted wavelength bandwidth.

A peculiar angular spectrum of input beam contains higher spatial frequencies that originate from phase and/or amplitude variations of the specimen transmission. Previously reported methods of gradient phase visualization are based on adjusting the angular spectrum of incoming light to the slope of the transfer function.23,24,27,28,34 This results in directional highlighting of phase gradients in the images. Since we use a symmetrical ring-shaped transfer function of the optical system, the processed images are characterized by nondirectional phase visualization.

3.

Optical System Design

A custom confocal acousto-optic HSI system for an infinity-conjugated microscope has been designed and built in-house. The layout of the experimental setup is shown in Fig. 3. An inverted optical microscope (Nikon, Ti-E) was used. The specimen was illuminated with a standard diascopic bright-field condenser. Reference bright-field images were captured with a color CCD camera (Nikon, DS-Fi2) at the eyepiece side port. The AM was located at the front focal plane of the first relay lens (RL1, f1=100  mm). Since the optical scheme of the microscope is not telecentric, we used an FL with a shorter focal length, ffl96  mm. It was enough for proper correction of the beam path with 10× to 40× microscope objectives (Nikon, Plan Apo λ). In proof-of-principle experiments, we used manually replaceable circular beam stops centered at the beam axis, but instead a 2-D liquid crystal spatial light modulator can be used for automated system operation. Three folding mirrors (M1, M2, and M3) were used for wrapping the optical system. Two of them also provided accurate beam alignment by means of pitch and yaw adjustments. Crossed polarizers (P1 and P2) provided the vertical polarization at the input of the AOTF and transmitted horizontally polarized diffracted light at the AOTF output. The custom-built AOTF operating in visible and near-infrared with the spectral passband δλ/λ2=20  cm1 has been designed and described previously.11,41 The diffraction plane was horizontal (parallel to the breadboard). The second relay lens (RL2, f2=50  mm) imaged the diffracted field at the CCD matrix (Apogee, Alta U32, 6.8  μm/pixel). The output iris diaphragm (D) was used to stop the residual stray light from the zero diffraction order.

Fig 3

(a) Schematic and (b) photograph of the experimental setup. FL, field lens; AM, amplitude mask; M1, M2, and M3, folding plane mirrors; RL1 and RL2, relay lenses; P1 and P2, polarizers; D, output diaphragm; CCD, CCD camera; and arrows show the beam path.

JBO_22_6_066017_f003.png

4.

Validation Experiments

In the experiments, we compared the performance of the proposed bandpass spatial filtering with the standard HSI technique performed with the same experimental setup without the AM. The captured images were not modified digitally except for intensity level adjustments not affecting the contrast.

An unstained cytological smear with human red blood cells from a biopsy was used as a test object (Fig. 4). The plots show a reference color image (a), a standard spectral image (b), and a spectral image after spatial filtering (c). Both images (b) and (c) were obtained at the wavelength λ=660  nm. An intensity profile of the image fragment with a section of a single cell is shown in Fig. 4(d). The horizontal section was centered on a cell marked with an arrow. Both the conventional bright-field image and the standard spectral image show the dark contours of single cells, while the spatial filtering operation mode suppresses the background and highlights the inner structure of the cells. The contrast between the cell and the background in spatial filtering mode is 50% higher than in HSI mode.

Fig 4

Micrographs of unstained human red blood cells in a biopsy cytological smear: (a) wide-field image, RGB; (b) conventional spectral image, grayscale; (c) spectral image with contrast enhancement, grayscale; and (d) image intensity profiles through a single cell (marked with an arrow in plots a, b, and c). Transmitted wavelength λ=660  nm, passband δλ=0.9  nm, and objective magnification 20×.

JBO_22_6_066017_f004.png

The scene is usually more complicated when the object is a histological section. A heterogenous tissue structure can contain different types of cells and stromal components, e.g., collagen fibers. A specimen in Fig. 5 is an unstained histological section of a surgically removed human malignant tumor, namely, papillary thyroid carcinoma. The same fragment of the specimen was captured at two different objective magnifications: 20× and 40×. The diffracted wavelength was λ=610  nm.

Fig 5

Micrographs of a thyroid histological section: (a) and (c) conventional spectral image and (b) and (d) spectral image with bandpass spatial filtering. Transmitted wavelength λ=610  nm and passband δλ=0.75  nm. Objective magnification: (a and b) 20×; (c and d) 40×. Marked square area in (a) and (b) corresponds to the field of view in (c) and (d), respectively.

JBO_22_6_066017_f005.png

Imaging of stained specimens demonstrates the performance of acousto-optic spatial filtering when the object transmission spatially varies both in phase and in amplitude. We used a thyroid histological section stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Spectral filtering was performed at two different wavelengths: 660 and 810 nm. The results are shown in Fig. 6. At the wavelength of 660 nm, the stained tissue structures are not transparent and are clearly distinguishable in the spectral image (a). The spatially filtered image (b) demonstrates the effect of simultaneous amplitude (darker cell nuclei) and phase (highlighted contours) transmission variations in the specimen. In near-infrared, λ=810  nm, all structures in the specimen become transparent (c), but the phase modulation of transmitted light remains and can be seen after spatial filtering (d).

Fig 6

Micrographs of an H&E-stained thyroid histological section: (a) and (c) conventional spectral image and (b) and (d) spectral image with bandpass spatial filtering. Transmitted wavelength and passband are wavelength (a and b) λ=660  nm, δλ=0.9; (c and d) λ=810  nm, δλ=1.3  nm. Objective magnification 40×.

JBO_22_6_066017_f006.png

Summarizing the experimental results, we can mention that the proposed method of spatial filtering provides a new modality of spectral imaging. The suppression of uniform background by blocking optical spatial frequencies around zero enables phase visualization. This image processing regime can be used independently or together with conventional HSI providing additional information for data postprocessing. The HSI system retains high spectral resolution of the AOTF since spatial filtering is matched with the AOTF transfer function.

5.

Summary

An optical phase visualization method for advanced hyperspectral image processing has been demonstrated in a custom-built acousto-optic HSI instrument with a commercial bright-field microscope using broadband diascopic incoherent illumination. For this purpose, an additional AM providing spatial filtering in a telecentric confocal system was used. The angular spectrum of light transmitted by the mask was matched with the transfer function of the AOTF in a detuned NPM geometry. Without using the mask, the system was operating in a conventional hyperspectal image processing mode. The benefit of the system is high spectral resolution of HSI data acquisition in real time owing to using an AOTF as a monochromator.

All image processing in our system is performed in the detector part of the optical system. The processing of incoherent light with a standard microscope by the proposed system allows using unmodified diascopic illumination for transmission imaging. The method can also be applied without constraints for processing of epifluorescence images. Higher contrast and phase visualization was demonstrated in bandpass spatial filtering mode using unstained cytological smears of human red blood cells and histological sections of human thyroid as test specimens. The proposed method of image processing can be useful for visualization of low-contrast objects in microbiological and medical HSI for research and diagnostics.

Disclosures

The work was carried out with financial support from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the Government of Moscow (Project No. 15-37-70002) and the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation in the Framework of Increasing Competitiveness Program of NUST MISIS (Project No. K2-2016-072). The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgments

The specimens used in experiments were kindly provided and described by Professor A. Yu. Abrosimov.

References

1. 

Techniques and Applications of Hyperspectral Image Analysis, Wiley, Chichester, UK (2007). Google Scholar

2. 

D. Bannon, “Hyperspectral imaging: cubes and slices,” Nat. Photonics, 3 (11), 627 –629 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2009.205 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

3. 

G. Lu and B. Fei, “Medical hyperspectral imaging: a review,” J. Biomed. Opt., 19 (1), 010901 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.1.010901 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

4. 

R. Schultz et al., “Hyperspectral imaging: a novel approach for microscopic analysis,” Cytometry, 43 (4), 239 –247 (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0320 CYTODQ 0196-4763 Google Scholar

5. 

B. Regeling et al., “Development of an image pre-processor for operational hyperspectral laryngeal cancer detection,” J. Biophotonics, 9 (3), 235 –245 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbio.v9.3 Google Scholar

6. 

H. Zhang et al., “Penetration depth of photons in biological tissues from hyperspectral imaging in shortwave infrared in transmission and reflection geometries,” J. Biomed. Opt., 21 (12), 126006 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.21.12.126006 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

7. 

N. Gat, “Imaging spectroscopy using tunable filters: a review,” Proc. SPIE, 4056 50 –64 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.381686 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

8. 

S. V. Panasyuk et al., “Medical hyperspectral imaging to facilitate residual tumor identification during surgery,” Cancer Biol. Ther., 6 (3), 439 –446 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cbt.6.3.4018 Google Scholar

9. 

S. J. Leavesley et al., “Hyperspectral imaging microscopy for identification and quantitative analysis of fluorescently-labeled cells in highly autofluorescent tissue,” J. Biophotonics, 5 (1), 67 –84 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbio.v5.1 Google Scholar

10. 

A. S. Machikhin and V. E. Pozhar, “Double-AOTF-based aberration-free spectral imaging endoscopic system for biomedical applications,” J. Innovative Opt. Health Sci., 8 (3), 1541009 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1793545815410096 JPIMDD 0737-6782 Google Scholar

11. 

K. B. Yushkov et al., “Contrast enhancement in microscopy of human thyroid tumors by means of acousto-optic adaptive spatial filtering,” J. Biomed. Opt., 21 (1), 016003 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.21.1.016003 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

12. 

H. Akbari et al., “Hyperspectral imaging and quantitative analysis for prostate cancer detection,” J. Biomed. Opt., 17 (7), 076005 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.7.076005 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

13. 

S. Kiyotoki et al., “New method for detection of gastric cancer by hyperspectral imaging: a pilot study,” J. Biomed. Opt., 18 (2), 026010 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.2.026010 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

14. 

J.-R. Duann et al., “Separating spectral mixtures in hyperspectral image data using independent component analysis: validation with oral cancer tissue sections,” J. Biomed. Opt., 18 (12), 126005 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.12.126005 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

15. 

G. Lu et al., “Spectral-spatial classification for noninvasive cancer detection using hyperspectral imaging,” J. Biomed. Opt., 19 (10), 106004 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.10.106004 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

16. 

D. R. McCormack et al., “In vivo hyperspectral imaging of microvessel response to trastuzumab treatment in breast cancer xenografts,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 5 (7), 2247 –2261 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.002247 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

17. 

S. Zhu et al., “Identification of cancerous gastric cells based on common features extracted from hyperspectral microscopic images,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 6 (4), 1135 –1145 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.6.001135 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

18. 

A. Goto et al., “Use of hyperspectral imaging technology to develop a diagnostic support system for gastric cancer,” J. Biomed. Opt., 20 (1), 016017 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.20.1.016017 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

19. 

Z. Han et al., “In vivo use of hyperspectral imaging to develop a noncontact endoscopic diagnosis support system for malignant colorectal tumors,” J. Biomed. Opt., 21 (1), 016001 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.21.1.016001 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

20. 

L. M. Almassalha et al., “Label-free imaging of the native, living cellular nanoarchitecture using partial-wave spectroscopic microscopy,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 113 (42), E6372 –E6381 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608198113 Google Scholar

21. 

J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics, 3rd ed.Roberts, New York (2005). Google Scholar

22. 

D. B. Murphy and M. W. Davidson, Fundamentals of Light Microscopy and Electronic Imaging, 2nd ed.Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey (2002). Google Scholar

23. 

T. Kim, S. Sridharan and G. Popescu, “Gradient field microscopy of unstained specimens,” Opt. Express, 20 (6), 6737 –6745 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.006737 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

24. 

T. Kim et al., “Gradient field microscopy for label-free diagnosis of human biopsies,” Appl. Opt., 52 (1), A92 –A96 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.52.000A92 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

25. 

V. B. Voloshinov, T. M. Babkina and V. Ya. Molchanov, “Two-dimensional selection of optical spatial frequencies by acousto-optic methods,” Opt. Eng., 41 (6), 1273 –1280 (2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.1477437 Google Scholar

26. 

V. I. Balakshy et al., “Optical image processing by means of acousto-optic spatial filtration,” J. Mod. Opt., 52 (1), 1 –20 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500340410001669408 JMOPEW 0950-0340 Google Scholar

27. 

V. I. Balakshy and V. B. Voloshinov, “Acousto-optic image processing in coherent light,” Quantum Electron., 35 (1), 85 –90 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1070/QE2005v035n01ABEH002782 QUELEZ 1063-7818 Google Scholar

28. 

V. I. Balakshy and D. E. Kostyuk, “Acousto-optic image processing,” Appl. Opt., 48 (7), C24 –C32 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.48.000C24 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

29. 

V. B. Voloshinov, K. B. Yushkov and B. Linde, “Improvement in performance of a TeO2 acousto-optic imaging spectrometer,” J. Opt. A-Pure Appl. Opt., 9 (4), 341 –347 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1464-4258/9/4/006 Google Scholar

30. 

S. P. Anikin et al., “An acousto-optical imaging spectrometer for astrophysical measurements,” Opt. Spectrosc., 121 (1), 115 –122 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X1607002X OPSUA3 0030-400X Google Scholar

31. 

Design and Fabrication of Acousto-Optic Devices, Marcel Dekker, New York (1994). Google Scholar

32. 

K. B. Yushkov and V. Ya. Molchanov, “Acousto-optic filters with arbitrary spectral transmission,” Opt. Commun., 355 177 –180 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2015.06.047 OPCOB8 0030-4018 Google Scholar

33. 

V. V. Proklov, O. A. Byshevski-Konopko and V. I. Grigorievski, “On the possibility of developing incoherent fibre-optic data transmission systems based on signal spectral coding with matched acousto-optical filters,” Quantum Electron., 43 (6), 542 –545 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1070/QE2013v043n06ABEH015178 QUELEZ 1063-7818 Google Scholar

34. 

V. I. Balakshy and A. G. Kukushkin, “Visualization of phase objects under Bragg-diffraction of light,” Opt. Spectrosc., 88 (1), 99 –103 (2000). OPSUA3 0030-400X Google Scholar

35. 

P. P. Banerjee, D. Cao and T.-C. Poon, “Basic image-processing operations by use of acousto-optics,” Appl. Opt., 36 (14), 3086 –3089 (1997). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.36.003086 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

36. 

V. M. Kotov et al., “Two-dimensional image edge enhancement in the two-phonon diffraction,” Quantum Electron., 40 (4), 368 –370 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1070/QE2010v040n04ABEH014234 QUELEZ 1063-7818 Google Scholar

37. 

A. S. Machikhin, L. I. Burmak and V. E. Pozhar, “Visualization of the phase structure of optically transparent objects on the basis of acousto-optical filtration of interference images,” Instrum. Exp. Tech., 59 (6), 829 –833 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0020441216060038 INETAK 0020-4412 Google Scholar

38. 

D. R. Suhre, L. J. Denes and N. Gupta, “Telecentric confocal optics for aberration correction of acousto-optic tunable filters,” Appl. Opt., 43 (6), 1255 –1260 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.43.001255 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

39. 

D. R. Suhre and N. Gupta, “Acousto-optic tunable filter sidelobe analysis and reduction with telecentric confocal optics,” Appl. Opt., 44 (27), 5797 –5801 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.005797 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

40. 

I. C. Chang, “Noncollinear acousto-optic filter with large angular aperture,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 25 (7), 370 –372 (1974). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1655512 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

41. 

V. Ya. Molchanov et al., “An acousto-optical imaging spectrophotometer for astrophysical observations,” Astron. Lett., 28 (10), 713 –720 (2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/1.1512228 ALETEO 1063-7737 Google Scholar

Biography

Konstantin B. Yushkov is a leading researcher at the Acousto-Optical Research Center of the National University of Science and Technology MISIS. He received his MS degree and PhD in physics from Lomonosov Moscow State University in 2007 and 2010, respectively. He is an author of more than 30 journal papers and holds 4 national patents. His current research interests include acousto-optics, ultrafast optics, hyperspectral imaging, and biomedical optics.

Vladimir Ya. Molchanov is a vice director of the Acousto-Optical Research Center at the National University of Science and Technology MISIS, responsible for R&D projects. He received his MS degree and PhD in physics from Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology in 1969 and 1979, respectively. He is an author of more than 60 journal papers and 2 monographs and holds more than 10 national patents. His current research interests include acousto-optics, signal processing, ultrafast optics, and biomedical optics.

© 2017 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) 1083-3668/2017/$25.00 © 2017 SPIE
Konstantin B. Yushkov and Vladimir Ya Molchanov "Hyperspectral imaging acousto-optic system with spatial filtering for optical phase visualization," Journal of Biomedical Optics 22(6), 066017 (29 June 2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.22.6.066017
Received: 3 March 2017; Accepted: 12 June 2017; Published: 29 June 2017
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 22 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Acousto-optics

Spatial filters

Visualization

Hyperspectral imaging

Imaging systems

Visual optics

Image processing

RELATED CONTENT

Hyperspectral imaging using acousto-optic tunable filters
Proceedings of SPIE (August 24 1999)
Adaptive hyperspectral band selection
Proceedings of SPIE (September 10 2005)
Image Processing With In-Line Optical Systems
Proceedings of SPIE (April 01 1969)

Back to Top