Open Access
12 November 2021 Label-free quantitative measurement of cardiovascular dynamics in a zebrafish embryo using frequency-comb-referenced-quantitative phase imaging
Jeeranan Boonruangkan, Hamid Farrokhi, Rohith T. Madam, Samuel Kwok, Tom J. Carney, Pei-Chen Su, Young-Jin Kim
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Significance: Real-time monitoring of the heart rate and blood flow is crucial for studying cardiovascular dysfunction, which leads to cardiovascular diseases.

Aim: This study aims at in-depth understanding of high-speed cardiovascular dynamics in a zebrafish embryo model for various biomedical applications via frequency-comb-referenced quantitative phase imaging (FCR-QPI).

Approach: Quantitative phase imaging (QPI) has emerged as a powerful technique in the field of biomedicine but has not been actively applied to the monitoring of circulatory/cardiovascular parameters, due to dynamic speckles and low frame rates. We demonstrate FCR-QPI to measure heart rate and blood flow in a zebrafish embryo. FCR-QPI utilizes a high-speed photodetector instead of a conventional camera, so it enables real-time monitoring of individual red blood cell (RBC) flow.

Results: The average velocity of zebrafish’s RBCs was measured from 192.5 to 608.8  μm  /  s at 24 to 28 hour-post-fertilization (hpf). In addition, the number of RBCs in a pulsatile blood flow was revealed to 16 cells/pulse at 48 hpf. The heart rates corresponded to 94 and 142 beats-per-minute at 24 and 48 hpf.

Conclusions: This approach will newly enable in-depth understanding of the cardiovascular dynamics in the zebrafish model and possible usage for drug discovery applications in biomedicine.

1.

Introduction

The study of a cardiovascular system (including the heart, blood, and blood vessels) and its detailed functions is an important step toward developing cardiovascular drugs.1,2 In the field of biomedicine, drug discovery requires preclinical studies in an animal model before testing it in the human body. Zebrafish have been used as a good animal model for studying the human cardiovascular system, due to their optical transparency and fast development in their embryonic stage. Moreover, 70% of zebrafish genes are in common with human, and 84% of zebrafish genes are associated with human diseases.3,4 Various techniques have previously been adopted to provide quantitative assessments of the heart rate and blood flow in embryonic zebrafish. Bright-field microscopy with a high-speed camera is the most common tool for measuring the blood velocity; however, the image contrast has remained low due to the transparent nature of red blood cells (RBCs).5,6 Fluorescence microscopy has been introduced for a better image contrast with fluorescent labeling;79 however, it requires a transgenic modified zebrafish for imaging, which is phototoxic and time-consuming.

Label-free techniques have received much attention in the biological fields because the biological specimens can be monitored and investigated without any disturbance or alteration of their normal physiology. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy has been developed as a minimally invasive fluorescence imaging technique that employs confocal microscopy to deduce the blood velocity from the autofluorescence fluctuation.10,11 The autofluorescence imaging of in vivo blood flow can be realized with two-photon microscopy;12 however, the autofluorescence from the blood cells is significantly low compared with the other nearby regions. The adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope has been used to measure the retinal blood velocity with a high lateral resolution; however, the detection speed is limited by the scanning rate.13 The optical vector field tomography [the optical equivalent of x-ray computed tomography (CT)] can provide a three-dimensional blood velocity map.14 Nevertheless, the sample rotation for data acquisition is troublesome and degrades the measurement speed. Recently, pupil-engineered localization microscopy, using an Airy-complementary kernel matching technique, has been used for high spatial and temporal resolutions for a high-volume blood flow analysis;15 however, this technique requires the injection of the fluorescent beads as a tracer, which is invasive. Quantitative phase imaging (QPI) was proposed to attain a minimally invasive quantitative measurement of biological specimens.16 Several studies have shown the successful use of QPI to measure cardiomyocyte dynamics over a wide field of view to the speed up to tens of Hz for various applications such as drug development.1720

Doppler optical coherence tomography (DOCT) is one QPI technique that has been used to visualize the blood flow in a wider area.21,22 Digital particle image velocimetry was utilized for analyzing the velocity of blood flow and the individual RBC in DOCT. However, the RBC profile cannot be precisely resolved because the optical configuration does not support a high numerical aperture (NA) lens and is under a high-level laser speckle. In QPI, it is unavoidable to encounter the speckle effect, which could severely degrade the measurement precision.

In this study, we report that frequency-comb-referenced quantitative phase imaging (FCR-QPI) works as a simple, minimally invasive, and effective technique to measure the heart rate and blood flow of zebrafish embryos. The frequency comb (FC) has been used as a remarkable light source for QPI, which offers phase-coherent multiple wavelengths, suppressed speckle level, and high phase stability at a high measurement speed up to tens of kilohertz.23 Due to the speckle-suppression offered by this FCR-QPI technique, the RBCs flow in the zebrafish’s blood vessels could be monitored by both a slow CCD camera and a high-speed photodetector with minimum background speckle noise. The heart rate and blood flow of the zebrafish embryos at various ages [from 24 to 56 hour-post-fertilization (hpf)] were measured in real-time. The heart rate increased with the fish development from 94 beats-per-minute (bpm) at 24 hpf to 173 bpm at 50 hpf; then, it starts to decrease until 120 bpm at 56 hpf. The blood flow was measured as a form of the RBC velocity at 24 to 28 hpf (Vmean=192.5 to 608.8  μm/s). At 48 hpf, the pulsatile blood flow was monitored using a high-speed photodetector, which can reveal the individual RBC information (e.g., number of RBCs, diameter, and heartbeat) and the heartbeat development pattern as a vital sign of the heart’s health.

2.

Frequency-Comb-Referenced QPI of Zebrafish Embryos

2.1.

Frequency-Comb-Referenced Quantitative Phase Imaging

A zebrafish at 24 hpf was fixed as a biosample in a microscope slide and imaged by a white-light (WL) bright-field microscope, which clearly showed the heart and blood vessels, as shown in Fig. 1(a). Main trunk vessels, which include the dorsal aorta (DA) and post-cardinal vein (PCV), were highlighted by red and blue lines, respectively. Figure 1(b) shows the optical configuration of the FCR-QPI. An Erbium-doped fiber FC emitted the ultrashort pulse train at a repetition rate of 250 MHz with a fundamental wavelength of 1550 nm. The wavelength was then converted to 780 nm by a nonlinear second harmonic generation. The beam was coupled into a photonic crystal fiber leading to spectral broadening to a supercontinuum ranging from 620 to 980 nm. The supercontinuum was delivered to illuminate the zebrafish’s heart and blood vessels located on the microscope. The light from the sample was collected by an objective lens (M=60, N.A.=0.7) and directed to the QPI unit, which is a modified version of Michelson’s interferometry based on off-axis and common-path design strategies.24 The QPI configuration satisfies both off-axis and common-path geometry for high spatial data acquisition with high phase stability. When the illumination beam passes through the sample area, an unperturbed portion of the beam as a reference is carefully angled and superposed with the sample image. The modified Michelson-type QPI unit with controlled mirror angle matches the OPD for forming the low-coherence interferogram within the short temporal coherence length of the FC.2426

Fig. 1

FCR-QPI. (a) Zebrafish embryo imaged under a WL microscope (M=10×). (b) System configuration of FCR-QPI: L, lens; M, mirror; C, collimator; O, objective lens; TL, tube lens; BS, beam splitter; I, iris; CCD, charge-coupled device; PD, photodetector.

JBO_26_11_116004_f001.png

Two types of detectors were utilized in this study: a CCD camera (DCU223, Thorlabs) and a Si-photodetector (PDA-36A, Thorlabs). The photodetector was used to monitor the high-speed dynamic motions of the RBCs. The CCD camera was used to locate the position of interest and provide spatial information of the heart and RBCs. For more details on FCR-QPI refer to Ref. 27.

2.2.

Preparation of Zebrafish Embryo Samples

The zebrafish embryos were grown and maintained by standard procedures.28 The zebrafish embryos were derived from natural mating of the AB strain wild-type adults, housed in the LKC Medicine’s zebrafish facility at NTU-Singapore. The zebrafish housing, mating, and embryo manipulations were performed under the oversight of the NTU’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) under IACUC Protocol Number A18002 and complied with the National Advisory Committee for Laboratory Animal Research (NACLAR) Guidelines set out by the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA) of Singapore. The embryos were collected and maintained in E3 media (5 mM NaCl, 0.17 mM KCl, 0.33 mM CaCl2, 0.33 mM MgSO4, 105% methylene blue). The embryos were dechorionated with watchmakers’ forceps and anesthetized with 0.02% Tricaine (buffered to pH=7.0). The embryos were added into 0.7% molten low melting agarose maintained at 42°C. The vacuum grease was used to draw a border around the edges of a standard microscope glass slide. The embryos were pipetted onto the glass slide inside the vacuum grease border and orientated using a fine gel loading tip. After the gel solidified, the vacuum grease-bordered area was flooded with E3 media, and a long glass coverslip was used to cover the mounted specimens (5 embryos/slide). Zebrafish aged 24 and 48 hpf were used in this study.

3.

Measurement Results and Discussions

3.1.

Comparative Study on Different QPI Light Sources

We used three different light sources: WL, FC, and continuous-wave laser diode (LD) in the same QPI setup to evaluate their performances comparably. Figure 2(a) shows the QPI interferograms of the RBCs flowing through the vessel. To compare their imaging qualities, fast Fourier transform (FFT) analysis was performed on the images as shown in Fig. 2(b); the extracted FFT line profiles are shown in Fig. 2(c). Figure 2(c) clearly shows the side harmonics for FC and LD, which lack in WL FFT line. We used the (1) background speckle noise and (2) signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for detailed analysis, as shown in Fig. 2(d). The background noise was suppressed from 9.90±0.05  dBc in LD to 10.65±0.05dBc and 11.34±0.06  dBc in FC and WL, respectively; these series of results imply that the background image gets cleaner with lower speckle levels. The QPI carrier frequency was used for the SNR analysis; the SNR analysis confirmed that the SNR of FC interferogram was higher than that of LD, implying the significant speckle noise suppression with the FC. The higher SNR leads to cleaner raw images, higher lateral resolution, and hence effective phase reconstruction. However, the SNR of the FC interferogram was slightly lower than that of WL (SNR = 1.85 for FC and 1.91 for WL). The relatively low (almost incoherent) QPI images by WL illumination cannot support phase reconstruction. Although the WL illumination has slightly higher SNR (DC/background signal level) comparing to the FC illumination, it can NOT support accurate and large FOV phase reconstruction due to lack of the harmonic components.

Fig. 2

Evaluation of imaging performance of different light sources in QPI. (a) QPI images of zebrafish trunk illuminated by WL, FC, and continuous-wave LD. (b) FFT spectrums analyzed from the QPI images in (a). (c) Line extraction from the FFT spectrums of three light sources. (d) Average background (BG) noise and SNR, calculated in the Fourier domain.

JBO_26_11_116004_f002.png

3.2.

Interferogram and Dynamic Red Blood Cell Analysis

Phase reconstruction was performed by the FFT analysis. This process includes four modules: (1) 2D FFT, (2) cropping, shifting, and zero-padding, (3) 2D inverse FFT (IFFT), and (4) Goldstein’s phase unwrapping and phase map reconstruction modules. Following these procedures, the topographic phase map of RBCs in zebrafish’s blood vessel was reconstructed, as shown in Fig. 3(a). Because our approach is a single-shot approach, we could monitor the dynamic motion of RBCs with a higher temporal resolution (determined by the frame rate of a CCD). By performing phase reconstruction at each frame, time-lapse phase maps of RBC flowing in the blood vessel were obtained as shown in Fig. 3(b). The refractive index (RI) variation of the blood vessel can cause multiple scattering, which eventually results in higher speckle noise and hinder the successful phase reconstruction. Due to low temporal and high spatial coherence of the FC, which largely suppresses the speckle noise across the field and provides high visibility interferograms, we could easily attain the phase maps of individual RBCs inside the blood vessel with the suppressed coherent speckle noise level. We carefully select cropping size to include low- and high-frequency components for the phase reconstruction.

Fig. 3

Phase reconstruction of an RBC from QPI interferogram. (a) Procedures for phase reconstruction of a single RBC. (b) Time-lapse phase maps of RBC flow in the blood vessel.

JBO_26_11_116004_f003.png

3.3.

Heart Rate Measurement by FCR-QPI

FCR-QPI was employed to monitor the heart development and corresponding changes in the heart rates of zebrafish embryos from 24 hpf. A CCD camera was used first to obtain the overall morphology of the zebrafish’s heart, then the dynamic motions of the specific part of the heart were measured by a high-speed photodetector. Figures 4(a) and 4(b) show the QPI images of a heart tube at 24 hpf and a chambered heart at 48 hpf (pink shadow area). Figure 4(c) shows the measured phase modulation originating from the heart contraction and relaxation at 24 hpf. By performing the FFT, the frequency was determined to 1.56 Hz, corresponding to the heart rate of 94 bpm. The heartbeat in the zebrafish at 48 hpf was measured at different positions; the atrium (A), atrioventricular (A-V) canal, and ventricle (V) [see Figs. 4(d-1), 4(d-2), and 4(d-3)]. The period of the signal at the ventricle is set to be larger than the atrium because of the larger volume of the ventricle. At the A-V canal, both signals from the atrium and ventricle were superposed. We measured the heart rates in various fish ages as shown in Fig. 4(e). At an early stage of development, the heart rate increased from 94 bpm (24 hpf) to 173 bpm (50 hpf). Then, it began decreasing to 122 bpm at 56 hpf. It is noteworthy that the heart rate depends on not only the age but also the surrounding temperature; the temperature was set to 28°C in our study. These in-depth studies of the dynamic motion of zebrafish’s heart can be used to investigate the abnormality of heart rhythm (which is known as cardiac arrhythmia), exploration of new drugs, and testing of new therapeutics;2931 for example, the heartbeat in a mutant zebrafish has been used to study the genetics related to the heart function.32

Fig. 4

FCR-QPI for measuring the dynamic motions of zebrafish’s heart. Phase images of zebrafish’s heart at (a) 24 hpf and (b) 48 hpf. (c) Periodic signals of the heartbeat at 24 hpf analyzed in time and frequency domains. Periodic signals of the heartbeat at 48 hpf measured at (d-1) atrium (A), (d-2) A-V canal, and (d-3) ventricle (V). (e) Heart rate measured at various hpf.

JBO_26_11_116004_f004.png

3.4.

Blood Flow Measurement by FCR QPI

At 24 hpf, the blood flows in two main vessels: DA and PCV. The blood leaves the heart and travels in DA then returns to the heart via PCV at the tail region. At this stage, individual RBCs flowing in the blood vessels are detected, as shown in Fig. 5(a). The interference signal from RBCs flowing in DA was recorded using the photodetector and CCD camera while passing through the region of interest [see Fig. 5(a)]. The high-speed photodetector newly enabled the determination of the phase profile of individual RBCs, as shown in Fig. 5(b). The technique was to acquire the interferogram in the CCD camera first with many interference carrier fringes for FFT analysis. Then, we controlled the tilt angle of the interferometry mirror to lower down the number of fringes for PD measurement. This is to avoid the information being averaged out by many interferograms in a single PD readout. The point of interest is then chosen by the iris to obtain the phase information at a high-speed rate using PD. The programmable aperture-adjustable pinhole/iris is installed at the common path for the position match and coregistration of the CCD image and the photodetector signal. We acquired the same image using a beam splitter with the fully opened pinhole for CCD image registration, then gradually adjusting the pinhole size for the position match down to pixel level for PD signal registration.

Fig. 5

Blood flow measurement. (a) Schematic drawing of RBCs flowing in the blood vessels at 24 hpf. (b) Signal of RBCs flowing in the DA. (c) Mean RBC velocity in DA and PCV. (d) Maximum RBC velocity in DA and PCV. (e) Schematic drawing of RBCs flowing in the blood vessels at 48 hpf. Signal of pulsatile RBCs flowing in the (f) DA and (g) PCV. (h) Conceptual drawing of the number of RBCs and pulse ratio. (i) Number of RBCs and (j) pulse ratio in one blood pulse measured in DA, CA, PCV, and CV. DA, dorsal aorta; CA, caudal artery; PCV, post-cardinal vein; CV, caudal vein.

JBO_26_11_116004_f005.png

We utilized the particle image velocimetry analysis for calculating the RBC velocity obtained by the CCD camera. The average RBC velocity increases as the fish develop from 24 to 28 hpf, and the velocity was higher in DA than PCV (Vmean=192.5 to 608.8  μm/s in the DA and 75.9 to 385.7  μm/s in the PCV) as shown in Figs. 5(c-1) and 5(c-2). The maximum RBC velocity in DA and PCV was calculated (Vmax=345.2 to 1079.9  μm/s in the DA and 139.5 to 618.8  μm/s in the PCV) as shown in Figs. 5(d-1) and 5(d-2). The in-depth understanding of vascular dynamics (i.e., blood velocity) can be beneficial for the investigation of endothelial dysfunctions that lead to vascular pathologies and diseases, including atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney diseases.3336 The blood flow in the zebrafish embryo can be used for the evaluation of vascular function.37 In addition, the initial blood flow in embryos plays an important role in cardiovascular development.38

At 48 hpf, the number of RBCs in the blood vessels and the velocity increase as shown in Fig. 5(e). At this stage, the chambered heart creates pulsatile blood flows, which have a large number of RBCs passing through the photodetector in a single heart pump, as shown in Figs. 5(f) and 5(g). Figures 5(f) and 5(g) show the detected interference signal of the pulsatile blood flow in the DA and PCV, which has several RBCs in a single magnified blood pulse. Four blood pulses correspond to the fourfold of heartbeat. In the DA, the blood pulses were compressed and traveled as an individual RBC package without a noticeable number of RBCs between different blood pulses. In contrast, while those individual blood pulses passing through PCV were expanded, so the spacing between them was filled in with several RBCs as shown in Fig. 5(g). For the quantitative analysis, the number of RBCs in a blood pulse and pulse ratios were calculated at main trunk vessels (DA and PCV) and caudal vessels [caudal artery (CA) and caudal vein (CV)]. CA and CV are the designated names of the DA and PCV in the tail portion. Figure 5(h) shows a conceptual drawing for calculating the number of RBCs and pulse ratio. The number of RBCs was obtained by counting the interference peaks of RBCs with aid of the cross-correlation method. The pulse ratio is the ratio of the highest peak (of the Gaussian fitting of the blood pulse) relative to the baseline. The average number of RBCs and average pulse ratio in a single blood pulse were highest in DA (N=16, pulse ratio = 28.5) and lowest in PCV (N=10, pulse ratio = 5.5) as shown in Figs. 5(i) and 5(j). This agrees with the fact that DA is located at the nearest distance from the heart, and PCV is farthest from the heart. Therefore, the blood exits the heart with a strong flow and gradually slows down at a long distance. The pulse ratio can reveal the heart’s performance for pumping the blood up. This study quantified the pulse ratio at different blood vessels, which could be useful in drug tests for relating their effects to heart-pumping.39 The time interval of individual RBC flown in the DA was 0.0152 s, which corresponds to 65.4 Hz.

3.5.

Discussions

This series of experiments and evaluations confirmed that FCR-QPI could be employed to measure the cardiovascular dynamics in the zebrafish embryo, as shown in Figs. 4(a)4(d) and 5(a)5(j). FCR-QPI can provide the real-time and quantitative analysis of the RBCs in the blood vessels in a minimally invasive manner. This is highly beneficial in live-cell studies. With a higher visibility interferograms and single-shot detection capability of FCR-QPI, the phase of single RBC flow inside the blood vessel could be reconstructed as shown in Fig. 3(b). The RBC velocity of a 48 hpf zebrafish was measured at various locations within the heart using a high-speed photodetector, which could serve as the performance indicator.

The average number of RBCs in a single blood pulse was highest in DA, which was measured to be N=16. This was obtained by counting phase peaks at the PD measurement. We used the programmable iris to select a very small area in the middle of a vessel where RBCs pass could ensure the phase signals are mainly from RBCs. Meanwhile, the phase signal fluctuation from the vessel’s movement has significantly lower frequency compared to the RBC movement.

To suppress the unexpected noise and attain the clear RBC flow, we controlled the tilt angle of the reference mirror in the interferometry, which successfully filtered out the measurement noises and also did not average out the phase information.

To date, we have not validated our study against other methods, such as two-photon or multiphoton imaging. We will consider such validation processes in our next study.

It is worth noting that single file RBC movement in the vessels may not be a valid assumption at later development stages due to the enlarged size of vessels and higher pulse rate, which suggests high number and multilayer RBC passage through the point-of-interest and error in counting phase peaks. As we described, this method works only in the early stage. In the later development stage, we may consider extracting intensity signal fluctuation in-depth (i.e., such as A-line in OCT) to avoid the measurement error.

At the A-V canal, both signals from the atrium and ventricle were superposed. It is possible to separate the contractions with either PD temporal filtering or FFT/IFFT analysis.

Figure 4(e) is obtained from 3-fish measurements. The drops in heart rate after 48 hpf are not quite well understood at the moment. The new introduction of a high-speed photodetector enables us to overcome the traditional limit in temporal resolution with the universal unit of m/s.

4.

Conclusion

We demonstrated the FCR-QPI as a minimally invasive and effective method for measuring the high-speed dynamic motion of zebrafish’s cardiovascular system at the cellular level. The heart rate of a zebrafish increased with the fish development up to 173 bpm at 50 hpf. The heart developed from the heart tube at 24 hpf to the chambered heart at 48 hpf, which was confirmed by the occurrence of the pulsatile blood flow at 48 hpf. The average blood flow velocity at 24 to 28 hpf was increased from 192.5 to 608.8  μm/s. By introducing the high-speed photodetector to the FCR-QPI, we could measure the high-speed RBC flow up to 65.4 Hz and extract the information on the number of RBCs at each blood pulse (16 cells/pulse) of a 48-hpf zebrafish. Minimally invasive, high-speed, and real-time monitoring of cellular RIs are highly requested for studying live zebrafish; for example, this study on the abnormality of cardiovascular dynamics in zebrafish can be used as a model for human vascular diseases. Therefore, FCR-QPI is expected to serve as a powerful tool for revealing out the details of human cardiac and vascular diseases.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Professor Seng-Woo Kim for in-depth discussions and insightful suggestions. Funding: National Research Foundation of the Republic of Korea (NRF-2012R1A3A1050386, NRF-2020R1A2C2102338, NRF-2020R1A2C210233811, and NRF-2021R1A4A1031660); KAIST UP Program; Singapore National Research Foundation (NRF-NRFF2015-02).

References

1. 

D. Bournele and D. Beis, “Zebrafish models of cardiovascular disease,” Heart Failure Rev., 21 803 –813 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-016-9579-y Google Scholar

2. 

C. T. Nguyen et al., “Zebrafish as a model for cardiovascular developments and disease,” Drug Discov. Today Dis. Models, 5 (3), 135 –140 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddmod.2009.02.003 Google Scholar

3. 

K. Howe et al., “The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome,” Nature, 496 498 –503 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12111 Google Scholar

4. 

A. V. Kalueff, A. M. Stewart and R. Gerlai, “Zebrafish as an emerging model for studying complex brain disorders,” Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 35 63 –75 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2013.12.002 TPHSDY 0165-6147 Google Scholar

5. 

R. Meissner et al., “In vivo vascular flow profiling combined with optical tweezers-based blood routing,” Proc. SPIE, 10413 104130H (2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2286117 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

6. 

H. Anton et al., “Pulse propagation by a capacitive mechanism drives embryonic blood flow,” Development, 140 (21), 4426 –4434 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.096768 Google Scholar

7. 

J. G. Goetz et al., “Endothelial cilia mediate low flow sensing during zebrafish vascular development,” Cell Rep., 6 (5), 799 –808 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.01.032 Google Scholar

8. 

E. De Luca et al., “ZebraBeat: a flexible platform for the analysis of the cardiac rate in zebrafish embryos,” Sci. Rep., 4 4898 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04898 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

9. 

S. L. Logan et al., “Automated high-throughput light-sheet fluorescence microscopy of larval zebrafish,” PLoS One, 13 (11), 0198705 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198705 POLNCL 1932-6203 Google Scholar

10. 

X. Shi et al., “Probing events with single molecule sensitivity in zebrafish and Drosophila embryos by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy,” Dev. Dyn., 238 (12), 3156 –3167 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.22140 DEDYEI 1097-0177 Google Scholar

11. 

X. Pan et al., “Characterization of flow direction in microchannels and zebrafish blood vessels by scanning fluorescence correlation spectroscopy,” J. Biomed. Opt., 12 014034 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2435173 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

12. 

Y. Zeng et al., “Label-free in vivo flow cytometry in zebrafish using two-photon autofluorescence imaging,” Opt. Lett., 37 (13), 2490 –2492 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.37.002490 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

13. 

C. M. A. Palochak et al., “Retinal blood velocity and flow in early diabetes and diabetic retinopathy using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy,” J. Clin. Med., 8 (8), 1165 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8081165 Google Scholar

14. 

W. Du et al., “Optical projection tomography using a commercial microfluidic system,” Micromachines, 11 293 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11030293 Google Scholar

15. 

Y. Zhou et al., “High-speed extended-volume blood flow measurement using engineered point-spread function,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 9 (12), 6444 –6454 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.9.006444 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

16. 

Y. Park, C. Depeursinge and G. Popescu, “Quantitative phase imaging in biomedicine,” Nat. Photonics, 12 578 –589 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0253-x NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

17. 

N. T. Shaked et al., “Whole-cell-analysis of live cardiomyocytes using wide-field interferometric phase microscopy,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 1 706 –719 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.1.000706 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar

18. 

B. Rappaz et al., “Automated multi-parameter measurement of cardiomyocytes dynamics with digital holographic microscopy,” Opt. Express, 23 13333 –13347 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.013333 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

19. 

K. Jaferzadeh et al., “Marker-free automatic quantification of drug-treated cardiomyocytes with digital holographic imaging,” ACS Photonics, 7 105 –113 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.9b01152 Google Scholar

20. 

B. Kemper et al., “Fast imaging of cardiomyocyte dynamics alterations after drug treatment utilizing quantitative phase digital holographic microscopy,” Proc. SPIE, 11249 112491S (2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2546255 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

21. 

V. Rajan et al., “Review of methodological developments in laser Doppler flowmetry,” Lasers Med. Sci., 24 269 –283 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-007-0524-0 Google Scholar

22. 

Y. Wang et al., “In vivo total retinal blood flow measurement by Fourier domain Doppler optical coherence tomography,” J. Biomed. Opt., 12 041215 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2772871 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

23. 

J. Boonruangkan et al, “Fast and sensitive quantitative phase imaging using a frequency comb,” in Sci. and Innov., CLEO USA, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/CLEO_SI.2019.SM2H.3 Google Scholar

24. 

Y. Baek et al., “White-light quantitative phase imaging unit,” Opt. Express, 24 9308 –9315 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.009308 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

25. 

B. Kemper et al., “Simplified approach for quantitative digital holographic phase contrast imaging of living cells,” J. Biomed. Opt., 16 026014 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3540674 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

26. 

P Girshovitz and N. T. Shaked, “Compact and portable low-coherence interferometer with off-axis geometry for quantitative phase microscopy and nanoscopy,” Opt. Express, 21 5701 –5714 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.005701 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

27. 

J. Boonruangkan et al., “Coherence-tailored multiwavelength high-speed quantitative phase imaging with a high phase stability via a frequency comb,” Adv. Photonics Res., 2 202000088 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adpr.202000088 Google Scholar

28. 

M. Westerfield, The Zebrafish Book. A Guide for the Laboratory Use of Zebrafish (Danio rerio), 4th ed.University of Oregon Press, Eugene (2000). Google Scholar

29. 

I. U. S. Leong et al., “Zebrafish as a model for long QT syndrome: the evidence and the means of manipulating zebrafish gene expression,” Acta Physiol., 199 (3), 257 –276 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.2010.02111.x Google Scholar

30. 

T. J. Chico, P. W. Ingham and D. C. Crossman, “Modeling cardiovascular disease in the zebrafish,” Trends Cardiovasc. Med., 18 150 –155 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2008.04.002 Google Scholar

31. 

C. A. MacRae, “Cardiac arrhythmia: in vivo screening in the zebrafish to overcome complexity in drug discovery,” Expert Opin. Drug Discovery, 5 (7), 619 –632 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2010.492826 Google Scholar

32. 

M. Fink et al., “A new method for detection and quantification of heartbeat parameters in Drosophila, zebrafish, and embryonic mouse hearts,” Biotechniques, 46 (2), 101 –113 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2144/000113078 BTNQDO 0736-6205 Google Scholar

33. 

Jr., M. A. Gimbrone and G. García-Cardeña, “Endothelial cell dysfunction and the pathobiology of atherosclerosis,” Circul. Res., 118 (4), 620 –636 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306301 Google Scholar

34. 

W. C. Aird, “Endothelial cell heterogeneity and atherosclerosis,” Curr. Atheroscler. Rep., 8 69 –75 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-006-0067-z Google Scholar

35. 

E. Gutiérrez et al., “Endothelial dysfunction over the course of coronary artery disease,” Eur. Heart J., 34 (41), 3175 –3181 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht351 EHJODF 0195-668X Google Scholar

36. 

J. Thambyrajah et al., “Abnormalities of endothelial function in patients with predialysis renal failure,” Heart, 83 205 –209 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.83.2.205 Google Scholar

37. 

S. C. Watkins et al., “High resolution imaging of vascular function in zebrafish,” PLoS One, 7 (8), e44018 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044018 POLNCL 1932-6203 Google Scholar

38. 

E. A. Jones, “The initiation of blood flow and flow induced events in early vascular development,” Semin. Cell Dev. Biol., 22 1028 –1035 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.09.020 SCDBFX 1084-9521 Google Scholar

39. 

D. J. Milan et al., “Drugs that induce repolarization abnormalities cause bradycardia in zebrafish,” Circulation, 107 (10), 1355 –1358 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000061912.88753.87 CIRCAZ 0009-7322 Google Scholar

Biography

Jeeranan Boonruangkan is a research engineer at the Institute of Bioengineering and Bioimaging. She received her PhD in mechanical engineering from Nanyang Technological University in 2020, on frequency comb reference quantitative phase imaging. Her current research interests include optical interferometry, holography, and biomedical imaging systems.

Hamid Farrokhi received his PhD in laser–matter interaction from Nanyang University of Technology (NTU), Singapore, in 2014. He continued his postdoctoral studies until 2016 in NTU with Professor Young-Jin Kim on quantitative phase imaging. He then joined Professor Gary Tearney at Harvard Medical School and the Wellman Center for Photomedicine at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, as a scientist and R&D engineer leading research and design activities in OCT-based medical diagnosis devices. He is currently working as a senior scientist at Cylite Optics-Australia. He has long been engaged in laser micro/nano fabrication and bio-medical laser imaging research. He has participated in three national scientific research projects and 15 enterprise research and development projects. He has won an award for excellence in innovation, published 26 SCI/EI papers, and authorized three US patents. His current research interests include ultrafast laser–matter interactions, holography, and bio-medical laser imaging systems.

Young-Jin Kim received his PhD from Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), South Korea, in 2008. He was an assistant professor and NRF fellow, from 2014 to 2019, in the School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. He is currently a professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering in KAIST. His research interest is ultrafast photonics for ultraprecision, to advance the ultraprecision light source technology from the IR to the EUV regime by ultrashort femtosecond lasers, and its interdisciplinary applications, including precision metrology, optical communication, surface topography, biomedical diagnosis, space LIDARs, and nano/micromaterial processing.

Biographies of the other authors are not available.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Jeeranan Boonruangkan, Hamid Farrokhi, Rohith T. Madam, Samuel Kwok, Tom J. Carney, Pei-Chen Su, and Young-Jin Kim "Label-free quantitative measurement of cardiovascular dynamics in a zebrafish embryo using frequency-comb-referenced-quantitative phase imaging," Journal of Biomedical Optics 26(11), 116004 (12 November 2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.11.116004
Received: 6 June 2021; Accepted: 22 October 2021; Published: 12 November 2021
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 1 scholarly publication.
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Heart

Blood

Blood circulation

Blood vessels

Photodetectors

Signal to noise ratio

Phase imaging

Back to Top