1 January 2009 Materials modeling and development for use in double-exposure lithography applications
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
The current optical photolithography technology is approaching the physical barrier to the minimum achievable feature size. To produce smaller devices, new resolution enhancement technologies must be developed. Double-exposure lithography has shown promise as a potential pathway that is attractive because it is much cheaper than double-patterning lithography and can be deployed on existing imaging tools. However, this technology is not possible without the development of new materials with nonlinear response to exposure dose. The performance of existing materials such as reversible contrast enhancement layers (rCELs), and theoretical materials such as intermediate state two-photon (ISTP) and optical threshold layer (OTL) materials in double-exposure applications have been investigated through computer simulation. All three materials yielded process windows in double-exposure mode. OTL materials showed the largest process window (depth of focus (DOF) 0.14 µm, exposure latitude (EL) 5.1%). ISTP materials had the next-largest process window (DOF 0.12 µm, EL 3.2%), followed by the rCEL (0.11 µm, 0.58%). This study is an analysis of the feasibility of using the materials in double-exposure mode.
©(2009) Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
Saul S. Lee, Kane Jen, C. Grant Willson, Jeffrey D. Byers, Paul A. Zimmerman, and Nicholas J. Turro "Materials modeling and development for use in double-exposure lithography applications," Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS 8(1), 011011 (1 January 2009). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3095589
Published: 1 January 2009
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 9 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Lithography

Picture Archiving and Communication System

Photomasks

Computer simulations

Electroluminescence

Imaging systems

Nonlinear response

Back to Top