|
1.IntroductionIn single-fiber sensors, where a fiber is used to transmit both the excitation light and the signal from the analyte,1, 2 the signal from the analyte is often emitted or scattered on the outside surface of the fiber tip, i.e., the sample is in contact with the fiber probe, known as contact sensing. To increase the sensitivity of these sensors, it is desirable to increase the active surface area where the signal is generated and collected and to shape the probe in such a geometry that most of the signal light can be coupled into the transmission (confined) modes of the fiber. While multimode fibers can be used to increase the active surface area, it is not clear how the geometry of the fiber probe affects the total collectible optical power. In this paper, we analyze the total collectible optical power of various specially shaped multimode optical fiber probes for contact sensing. With the examples of spherical, parabolic, and cone-shaped fiber tips, we show that an optimal geometry exists for each type of end-polished fiber probes. This analysis can be used to guide the design and optimization of various fiber sensors, including fluorescence sensors,3 surface plasmon resonance sensors,4 surface enhanced Raman sensors,1, 2 etc. 2.Theoretical ModelThe coupling efficiency from a source to an optical fiber has been calculated using geometrical approaches.5 However, most of the calculations on the shape-dependence of the fiber were calculated numerically using certain software, such as ZEMAX. Consider a multimode fiber with its end polished to a well-defined (e.g., spherical) shape where the signal light is generated and coupled into the fiber (see Fig. 1). As the core diameter of the fiber is much larger than the wavelength of light, we use a geometrical optics model to study the total collectible optical power.5 For a long enough fiber, only those rays that satisfy the total internal reflection condition at the interface between the core and the cladding of the fiber can successfully reach the detector. For a fiber probe with a specially shaped tip, we calculate the total collectible optical power as follows. Pick an arbitrary point on the fiber surface. Let be the local coordinate system, where the direction is normal to the local surface. In the case of a cylindrically symmetric fiber, such as a spherical one and the ones discussed later in this paper, we can have both the and axes in the cross-sectional plane containing the fiber axis. Consider an incident ray with the wave vector in air. In a local spherical coordinate system , is written as where is the incidence angle, and is the azimuth angle. After refraction, inside the fiber, the wave vector becomes . According to Snell’s Law, , , andwhere is the refractive index of the core.If the angle between and is less than , then this ray is confined inside the fiber core, where is , with the critical angle for the total internal reflection at the interface between the fiber core and cladding. Supposing that the refractive indices of the core and the cladding are and , respectively, the confined rays must satisfy the following condition: Let be the angle between and . In the coordinate, the unit vector in the direction can be written as , and Eq. 2 becomes: Substituting Eq. 1 and the expression of into Eq. 3, we can deduce: So the optical power collectible at this point and transmittable through the fiber is:where is the radiance from an individual emitting∕scattering point source on the surface of the fiber transmitted into the fiber core (with the consideration of the loss due to surface reflection), and the integration is carried out under the restriction of Eq. 4. With this restriction, only the light that satisfies the total internal reflection condition is included in the calculation; therefore, the collectible power indicates the portion of power that can reach the output end of the fiber. In general, the collectible power at certain point of the fiber tip may be a function of both the angle and the azimuth angle in the global coordinate system. In the case of a cylindrically symmetric fiber, it is only a function of . Intuitively, the acceptance solid angle [integration limit in Eq. 5] corresponds to the overlap between two solid angles. One of them is the solid angle containing all possible confined rays, and the other is the solid angle containing all the refracted rays entering the surface at the given point. The total optical power collectible over the entire probe surface area is then:where is the same as in Eq. 5, rewritten in the global Cartesian coordinate system ; is the equation that describes the curved surface of the fiber tip; and and are partial derivatives of with respect to and , respectively. The integration is carried out over the surface area that is in contact with the emitting∕scattering source. Notice that the choice of the origin of the global coordinate system is arbitrary. In the case of a spherical fiber tip, it can be conveniently chosen as the center of the sphere so that the integration can be calculated in the spherical coordinate system, , where is the radius of the sphere, and is the maximum angle between the and axes. In the case of other shapes, such as parabolic or cone-shaped fiber tips, Eq. 6 can be used in numerical calculations.3.Results for Fiber Probes with Three Different Geometrical ShapesUsing typical multimode fiber parameters, i.e., the diameter of the core and the refractive indices of the core and cladding and , the total optical power collectible by spherical, parabolic, and cone-shaped fiber tips are calculated and discussed in the following. For a fiber probe with a spherical tip, the calculation result of the total collectible optical power [Eq. 6] is shown in Fig. 2. For simplicity, we have neglected any energy loss due to reflection, scattering, or absorption when the rays enter the fiber. Such loss can be included with the knowledge of the external medium. Furthermore, we have also assumed that each point on the outside surface of the fiber tip acts as a point source. This assumption can be modified with the knowledge of the specific radiation pattern of the light emitting∕scattering process involved in the sensing mechanism. Notice that when , the end surface becomes a flat plane. In this case, the active area where the signal is generated is the smallest compared with fibers having other shaped tips; however, the acceptance solid angle at any point is the largest. As the value decreases, the active surface area increases; however, the acceptance solid angle decreases as we move away from the fiber axis. Figure 2 shows the collectible optical power for various radii of curvature normalized to that of a flat end. The results are obtained by numerically integrating Eq. 6 using MATLAB. As shown in Fig. 2, when equals 1.4560, the collectible optical power reaches its maximum, which is 45.60% higher than that collectible by a fiber with a flat end. The total collectible optical power using parabolic fiber tips is shown in Fig. 3. Again, using the flat tip as the reference, the total collectible optical power reaches its maximum when , i.e., the expression of the parabola is . As increases further, the tip of the fiber becomes sharper and the collectible optical power becomes smaller due to the decreased acceptance solid angles at points other than the vertex. For parabolic-shaped fiber probes, the maximum collectible optical power is 50.28% higher than that collectible with a flat-tip probe. The total collectible optical power as a function of the half vertex angle of a cone-shaped fiber tip is shown in Fig. 4. When the half vertex angle of the cone tip is smaller than , there is no collectable signal, because none of the rays entering from the side walls are confined. Notice that this is a result of the geometrical optics approximation for multimode fibers, which is no longer valid at the tip of a slowly tapered fiber. In this region, more accurate analysis needs to be carried out with the modal calculation of a tapered fiber. The total collectible optical power reaches its maximum, which is 119% larger than that collectible by a flat-ended fiber, when the half vertex angle equals . 4.ConclusionIn summary, for contact sensing using an end-polished multimode optical fiber probe, we have developed a physical model to calculate and optimize the total collectible optical power using fiber tips with various geometrical shapes. The optimization parameters for fiber probes with spherical, parabolic, and cone-shaped tips are given. Compared to a flat-ended fiber probe, our results show that the total collectible optical power can be improved by a factor of 1.3 to 2.2 depending on the shape of the tips. ReferencesY. Zhang,
C. Gu,
A. M. Schwartzberg, and
J. Z. Zhang,
“Surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensor based on D-shaped fiber,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., 87 123105
(2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2051799 0003-6951 Google Scholar
D. L. Stokes and
T. Vo-Dinh,
“Development of an integrated single-fiber SERS sensor,”
Sens. Actuators B, 69 28
–36
(2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005(00)00291-4 0925-4005 Google Scholar
N. E. Marcon and
B. C. Wilson,
“The value of fluorescence techniques in gastrointestinal endoscopy better than the endoscopist’s eye? II: the North American experience,”
Endoscopy, 30
(4), 419
–421
(1998). 0013-726X Google Scholar
R. C. Jorgenson and
S. S. Yee,
“A fiber-optic chemical sensor based on surface plasmon resonance,”
Sens. Actuators B, 12 213
–220
(1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-4005(93)80021-3 0925-4005 Google Scholar
Gerd Keiser, Optical Fiber Communications, 3rd ed.McGraw-Hill, Boston
(2000). Google Scholar
|