The field of optics has developed sophisticated ways to manipulate the flow of light by polishing pieces of glass or molding shapes from plastic. Many emerging applications, including displays, sensors, imaging systems, and communication devices, are now demanding a more favorable size, weight, power, and cost (SWaP-C) for the optical components to create ultra-compact optoelectronic systems. This is especially true when such systems are incorporated in wearables, drones, the internet of things (IoT), and point-of-care diagnostics where weight and size come at a premium. The need to miniaturize optical elements has propelled the field of metasurfaces[1–5], which has taught us how to create essentially planar optical elements by judiciously nanostructuring thin films of metal and semiconductor materials. Metasurfaces provide major advantages over conventional optics (e.g., a lens or prism) through their ability to decouple shape from function. For metasurfaces, it is the nanopattern that controls the optical function. This brings tremendous design flexibility in arranging the myriad light-scattering nanostructures in a metasurface, opening valuable new ways to manipulate optical wavefronts and mitigate aberrations. Fortunately, a developing intuition about the operation of metasurfaces and the widespread availability of powerful rapid-design software tools based on topological optimization, inverse design, and deep-learning principles has facilitated rapid progress in their development[6–8]. As a result, we have been able to create a wide range of high-performance small-form-factor optics components, realizing very high numerical apertures and minimal aberrations, which enable us to focus or redirect light, control the state-of-polarization, produce holograms, perform nonlinear optical functions, deliver multi-functionality, and enable complex light-field imaging. However, despite the notable progress, most metasurfaces have remained passive, merely converting one wavefront into another. Writing in Photonics Insights, Ding et al.[9] review one of the most recent frontiers in the metasurface field, which is aimed at electrifying metasurfaces. Here, the goal is to endow them with a variety of dynamic functions and facilitate reconfiguration through external electrical stimuli. If this can be achieved with high optical efficiencies, high speed, and low electrical power consumption, it will unlock a plethora of advanced capabilities in modern optics. One can imagine flat optical imaging systems that can dynamically reshape light fields to, e.g., tune the focus of a lens, tailor a polarization state, steer light beams, adjust wavefronts in real-time to mitigate aberrations, or alter resonant filtering functions. The review describes how such dynamic functions can impact a broad spectrum of technologies including medical and computational imaging, augmented and virtual reality (AR and VR), light detection and ranging (LIDAR), displays, adaptive optics, and (quantum) optical communication and processing. Current research is also opening up entirely new directions for explorative science as dynamic metasurfaces are not bound by the fundamental limits of static elements[10] and can, e.g., break Lorentz reciprocity or achieve Doppler-like wavelength shifts. This opens the door to new types of devices capable of providing optical isolation without the presence of magnetic fields and shows the way to realize topologically protected systems. The review provides a comprehensive overview of the key fundamental mechanisms by which metasurfaces can be tuned electrically. These mechanisms are intimately linked to materials and structures whose optical properties can display dramatic changes upon an electrical stimulus. As the interaction times/lengths for light waves that are traversing metasurfaces are very short, materials are needed that can display unity-order changes in their refractive index. An impressive amount of creative research is discussed on electronic and structural phase change materials, 2D materials with strong excitonic material resonances, microelectromechanical devices, semiconductor nanostructures that display Stark or free-carrier dispersion effects, electrochemical materials, transparent conductive oxides, and electro-optic materials. Even when metasurfaces are made from materials whose optical properties are hard to tune (e.g., noble metals), it is still possible to dynamically change their behavior by altering the dielectric environment[11–13]. Here, we can take advantage of the fact that metasurfaces have an open structure with many voids between the scattering nanostructures, which allows easy infiltration with liquids and soft materials. This has made it possible to, e.g., create tunable metasurfaces using mature liquid crystal technology[14–17] and microfluidics[18]. The review also illustrates how to benefit from plasmon[19–21], Mie[16,22], materials[23,24], and guided-mode resonances[25–27] to boost light–matter interaction and achieve larger tunability by exploiting resonant behaviors. In general, the enhanced light–matter interaction allows metasurfaces to do more with less, reducing materials and fabrication costs. Resonances also bring the valuable opportunity to selectively interact with light waves at a desired frequency, polarization, or angle of incidence. It is worth noting that the optical properties of resonant metasurface building blocks are as much determined by their geometric shape as by their material properties. This often brings flexibility in material choices and frequently makes it possible to select earth-abundant and environmentally friendly ones. This is why metasurface science is making it possible to move towards more sustainable fabrication and recycling pathways than those available for conventional optics. Reducing power consumption in dynamic metasurfaces with nanoscale pixel arrays is shaping up as one of the major challenges moving forward, rivaling that of densely integrated electronic circuitry. Fortunately, the two-dimensional (2D) form factor of metasurfaces affords facile, dense integration with electronics. The ability to stack 2D metasurface optics directly on top of essentially planar electronic systems brings the benefit of ultrahigh operational speeds and enables minimized power consumption. However, in the identification of new metasurface tuning mechanisms, it is very important to identify ones that can benefit from low electrical switching powers and low optical losses. In this regard, nonvolatile structural phase change materials and certain microelectromechanical devices, which only consume power during switching events, can bring valuable benefits. For this reason, advances in device technology require a continuous search for better materials. The active search for structural phase change materials that display low electrical switching powers and low optical losses in the visible, such as antimony sulfide (), is one example[28,29]. Given the many amazing traits of dynamic metasurfaces and the promising prototypes, it is worth asking what is needed to commercialize them. One key roadblock is the accessibility of low-cost, large-area nanofabrication techniques. For some applications, we can benefit from the advances in the semiconductor chip industry where phase-shift lithography as well as deep and extreme ultraviolet (UV) lithography technologies have been developed to provide the required nanoscale spatial resolution. It should come as no surprise that early applications of metasurfaces[30] have emerged in consumer electronics[31] and automotive sectors[32], where the capabilities of semiconductor foundries can be leveraged. Certain large-area applications in aerospace, solar, medical, chemical, and civil engineering require the printing of nanostructures at large scales and very low costs. A variety of new printing technologies based on soft lithography[33,34], including nanoimprint lithography[35,36] and transfer printing, are currently demonstrating their potential to create metasurfaces for solar energy[37,38], photonic devices[39], and biosensor technologies[40,41]. Another challenge is the fabrication reproducibility and long-term stability of electrified devices under continuous operation. Here, each material system presents its own challenges, making research and development of encapsulation oxides, adhesion layers, and contact interfaces increasingly important. As a closing point, it is worth noting that there are additional opportunities for electrified metasurfaces beyond the dynamic manipulation of light fields. Subwavelength structuring of metals and semiconductors can also enhance and manipulate light absorption[42–55] and emission[56–60] processes. For this reason, we have seen their successful introduction in solar cells[61–63], CMOS image sensors[51], solid-state light-emitters[60,64,65], and displays[66]. Nanopatterning of the continuous metal, semiconductor, and insulating layers in these devices has increased performance and enabled new optoelectronic functions. This area is ripe for commercialization, as the optoelectronic devices industry already makes extensive use of advanced nanostructuring techniques. For this reason, existing commercially-viable technologies may be re-envisioned by incorporating a series of strategic patterning steps into their fabrication process. Looking ahead, the capability to tune near-field light-matter interactions between individual emitters and a metasurface opens exciting possibilities for space-time quantum metasurfaces such as dynamically structuring light on the single-photon level[67–69]. There is also a broad range of opportunities for using metasurfaces to compact imaging systems and letting metasurfaces perform analog computing functions to extract more information from optical scenes[70–77]. We are at the start of a revolution in the development and commercialization of metasurface technologies. It is also clear that the fusion of semiconductor electronics and metasurface optics provides many new opportunities and application areas. It will be exciting to watch where the rapid electrification of metasurface technologies will take us in the coming years. The review by Ding et al.[9] in Photonics Insights will serve as an incredible valuable resource for those involved in pushing the boundaries in the field. AcknowledgmentsN. A. G. and M. L. B. acknowledge support from a US Department of Defense Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) grant (No. FA9550-21-1-0312) and US Department of Energy grant (No. DE-FG07-ER46426). N.A.G is grateful to the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina for its support via the Leopoldina Postdoctoral Fellowship (No. LPDS2020-12). ReferencesN. Yu and F. Capasso,
“Flat optics: controlling wavefronts with optical antenna metasurfaces,”
IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 19 4700423 https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2013.2241399 IJSQEN 1077-260X
(2013).
Google Scholar
H.-T. Chen, A. J. Taylor, and N. Yu,
“A review of metasurfaces: physics and applications,”
Rep. Prog. Phys., 79 76401 https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/7/076401 RPPHAG 0034-4885
(2016).
Google Scholar
P. Lalanne and P. Chavel,
“Metalenses at visible wavelengths: past, present, perspectives,”
Laser Photonics Rev., 11 1600295 https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201600295
(2017).
Google Scholar
A. I. Kuznetsov et al.,
“Roadmap for optical metasurfaces,”
ACS Photonics, 11 816 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.3c00457
(2024).
Google Scholar
S. A. Schulz et al.,
“Roadmap on photonic metasurfaces,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., 124 260701 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0204694 APPLAB 0003-6951
(2024).
Google Scholar
J. S. Jensen and O. Sigmund,
“Topology optimization for nano-photonics,”
Laser Photonics Rev., 5 308 https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201000014
(2011).
Google Scholar
C. M. Lalau-Keraly et al.,
“Adjoint shape optimization applied to electromagnetic design,”
Opt. Express, 21 21693 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.021693 OPEXFF 1094-4087
(2013).
Google Scholar
J. Jiang, M. Chen, and J. A. Fan,
“Deep neural networks for the evaluation and design of photonic devices,”
Nat. Rev. Mater., 6 679 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-00260-1
(2021).
Google Scholar
F. Ding, C. Meng, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi,
“Electrically tunable optical metasurfaces,”
Photonic Insights, 3 R07 https://doi.org/10.3788/pi.2024.r07
(2024).
Google Scholar
A. M. Shaltout, V. M. Shalaev, and M. L. Brongersma,
“Spatiotemporal light control with active metasurfaces,”
Science, 365 374 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2357 SCIEAS 0036-8075
(2019).
Google Scholar
S. Sun et al.,
“Real-time tunable colors from micro fluidic reconfigurable all-dielectric metasurfaces,”
ACS Nano, 12 2151 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b07121 ANCAC3 1936-0851
(2018).
Google Scholar
L. Cao et al.,
“Tuning the color of silicon nanostructures,”
Nano Lett., 10 2649 https://doi.org/10.1021/nl1013794 NALEFD 1530-6984
(2010).
Google Scholar
A. Kristensen et al.,
“Plasmonic colour generation,”
Nat. Rev. Mater., 2 16088 https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.88
(2016).
Google Scholar
A. Komar et al.,
“Electrically tunable all-dielectric optical metasurfaces based on liquid crystals,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., 110 071109 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4976504 APPLAB 0003-6951
(2017).
Google Scholar
C. Zou et al.,
“Electrically tunable transparent displays for visible light based on dielectric metasurfaces,”
ACS Photonics, 6 1533 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.9b00301
(2019).
Google Scholar
S. Q. Li et al.,
“Phase-only transmissive spatial light modulator based on tunable dielectric metasurface,”
Science, 364 1087 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw6747 SCIEAS 0036-8075
(2019).
Google Scholar
A. Komar et al.,
“Dynamic beam switching by liquid crystal tunable dielectric metasurfaces,”
ACS Photonics, 5 1742 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01343
(2018).
Google Scholar
Q. Li et al.,
“Metasurface optofluidics for dynamic control of light fields,”
Nat. Nanotechnol., 17 1097 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-022-01197-y NNAABX 1748-3387
(2022).
Google Scholar
M. L. Brongersma,
“Introductory lecture: nanoplasmonics,”
Faraday Discuss., 178 9 https://doi.org/10.1039/C5FD90020D FDISE6 1359-6640
(2015).
Google Scholar
J. Park et al.,
“All-solid-state spatial light modulator with independent phase and amplitude control for three-dimensional LiDAR applications,”
Nat. Nanotechnol., 16 69 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-00787-y NNAABX 1748-3387
(2021).
Google Scholar
P. C. V. Thrane et al.,
“MEMS tunable metasurfaces based on gap plasmon or Fabry-Pérot resonances,”
Nano Lett., 22 6951 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01692 NALEFD 1530-6984
(2022).
Google Scholar
A. I. Kuznetsov et al.,
“Optically resonant dielectric nanostructures,”
Science, 354 aag2472 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2472 SCIEAS 0036-8075
(2016).
Google Scholar
J. Groepvan de et al.,
“Exciton resonance tuning of an atomically thin lens,”
Nat. Photonics, 14 426 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-020-0624-y NPAHBY 1749-4885
(2020).
Google Scholar
S. Biswas et al.,
“Broadband electro-optic polarization conversion with atomically thin black phosphorus,”
Science, 374 448 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj7053 SCIEAS 0036-8075
(2021).
Google Scholar
S. Kim and M. L. Brongersma,
“Active flat optics using a guided mode resonance,”
Opt. Lett., 42 5 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.42.000005 OPLEDP 0146-9592
(2017).
Google Scholar
A. Overvig and A. Alù,
“Diffractive nonlocal metasurfaces,”
Laser Photonics Rev., 16 2100633 https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202100633
(2022).
Google Scholar
M. Lawrence, D. R. Barton, and J. A. Dionne,
“Nonreciprocal flat optics with silicon metasurfaces,”
Nano Lett., 18 1104 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04646 NALEFD 1530-6984
(2018).
Google Scholar
M. Delaney et al.,
“A new family of ultralow loss reversible phase-change materials for photonic integrated circuits: Sb2S3 and Sb2Se3,”
Adv. Funct. Mater., 30 1 https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202002447 AFMDC6 1616-301X
(2020).
Google Scholar
P. Moitra et al.,
“Programmable wavefront control in the visible spectrum using low-loss chalcogenide phase change metasurfaces,”
Adv. Mater., 35 2205367 https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202205367 ADVMEW 0935-9648
(2022).
Google Scholar
W. T. Chen and F. Capasso,
“Will flat optics appear in everyday life anytime soon?,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., 118 100503 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0039885 APPLAB 0003-6951
(2021).
Google Scholar
STMicroelectronics,
“Metalenz and STMicroelectronics deliver world’s first optical metasurface technology for consumer electronics devices,”
(2022). https://newsroom.st.com/media-center/press-item.html/t4458.html Google Scholar
D. Qin, Y. Xia, and G. M. Whitesides,
“Soft lithography for micro- and nanoscale patterning,”
Nat. Protoc., 5 491 https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.234 1754-2189
(2010).
Google Scholar
H. Kang et al.,
“Emerging low-cost, large-scale photonic platforms with soft lithography and self-assembly,”
Photonics Insights, 2 R04 https://doi.org/10.3788/PI.2023.R04
(2023).
Google Scholar
N. Kooy et al.,
“A review of roll-to-roll nanoimprint lithography,”
Nanoscale Res. Lett., 9 320 https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-9-320 NRLAAD 1556-276X
(2014).
Google Scholar
S. H. Ahn and L. J. Guo,
“High-speed roll-to-roll nanoimprint lithography on flexible plastic substrates,”
Adv. Mater., 20 2044 https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200702650 ADVMEW 0935-9648
(2008).
Google Scholar
C. Battaglia et al.,
“Nanoimprint lithography for high-efficiency thin-film silicon solar cells,”
Nano Lett., 11 661 https://doi.org/10.1021/nl1037787 NALEFD 1530-6984
(2011).
Google Scholar
E. C. Garnett et al.,
“Photonics for photovoltaics: advances and opportunities,”
ACS Photonics, 8 61 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.0c01045
(2021).
Google Scholar
R. Ji et al.,
“UV enhanced substrate conformal imprint lithography (UV-SCIL) technique for photonic crystals patterning in LED manufacturing,”
Microelectron. Eng., 87 963 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2009.11.134 MIENEF 0167-9317
(2010).
Google Scholar
O. Yavas, M. Svedendahl, and R. Quidant,
“Unravelling the role of electric and magnetic dipoles in biosensing with Si nanoresonators,”
ACS Nano, 13 4582 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b00572 ANCAC3 1936-0851
(2019).
Google Scholar
X. Xuan, H. S. Yoon, and J. Y. Park,
“A wearable electrochemical glucose sensor based on simple and low-cost fabrication supported micro-patterned reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite electrode on flexible substrate,”
Biosens. Bioelectron., 109 75 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2018.02.054 BBIOE4 0956-5663
(2018).
Google Scholar
H. A. Atwater and A. Polman,
“Plasmonics for improved photovoltaic devices,”
Nat. Mater., 9 205 https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2629 NMAACR 1476-1122
(2010).
Google Scholar
M. Esfandyarpour et al.,
“Metamaterial mirrors in optoelectronic devices,”
Nat. Nanotechnol., 9 542 https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.117 NNAABX 1748-3387
(2014).
Google Scholar
S. J. Kim et al.,
“Superabsorbing, artificial metal films constructed from semiconductor nanoantennas,”
Nano Lett., 16 3801 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01198 NALEFD 1530-6984
(2016).
Google Scholar
S. J. Kim et al.,
“Light trapping for solar fuel generation with Mie resonances,”
Nano Lett., 14 1446 https://doi.org/10.1021/nl404575e NALEFD 1530-6984
(2014).
Google Scholar
T. J. Kempa et al.,
“Semiconductor nanowires: a platform for exploring limits and concepts for nano-enabled solar cells,”
Energy Environ. Sci., 6 719 https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee24182c EESNBY 1754-5692
(2013).
Google Scholar
S. J. Kim et al.,
“Anti-Hermitian photodetector facilitating efficient subwavelength photon sorting,”
Nat. Commun., 9 316 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02496-y NCAOBW 2041-1723
(2018).
Google Scholar
A. Pors, M. G. Nielsen, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi,
“Plasmonic metagratings for simultaneous determination of Stokes parameters,”
Optica, 2 716 https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.2.000716
(2015).
Google Scholar
J. P. MuellerBalthasar, K. Leosson, and F. Capasso,
“Ultracompact metasurface in-line polarimeter,”
Optica, 3 42 https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.3.000042
(2016).
Google Scholar
A. Basiri et al.,
“Nature-inspired chiral metasurfaces for circular polarization detection and full-Stokes polarimetric measurements,”
Light Sci. Appl., 8 78 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-019-0184-4
(2019).
Google Scholar
S. Yokogawa, S. P. Burgos, and H. A. Atwater,
“Plasmonic color filters for CMOS image sensor applications,”
Nano Lett., 12 4349 https://doi.org/10.1021/nl302110z NALEFD 1530-6984
(2012).
Google Scholar
M. L. Brongersma,
“Plasmonic photodetectors, photovoltaics, and hot-electron devices,”
Proc. IEEE, 104 2349 https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2016.2592946 IEEPAD 0018-9219
(2016).
Google Scholar
A. McClung et al.,
“Snapshot spectral imaging with parallel metasystems,”
Sci. Adv., 6 eabc7646 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc7646 STAMCV 1468-6996
(2020).
Google Scholar
L. Cao et al.,
“Semiconductor nanowire optical antenna solar absorbers,”
Nano Lett., 10 439 https://doi.org/10.1021/nl9036627 NALEFD 1530-6984
(2010).
Google Scholar
S. J. Kim et al.,
“Creating semiconductor metafilms with designer absorption spectra,”
Nat. Commun., 6 7591 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8591 NCAOBW 2041-1723
(2015).
Google Scholar
M. Esfandyarpour et al.,
“Optical emission near a high-impedance mirror,”
Nat. Commun., 9 3324 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05505-w NCAOBW 2041-1723
(2018).
Google Scholar
A. Vaskin et al.,
“Light-emitting metasurfaces,”
Nanophotonics, 8 1151 https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2019-0110
(2019).
Google Scholar
S. Liu et al.,
“Light-emitting metasurfaces: simultaneous control of spontaneous emission and far-field radiation,”
Nano Lett., 18 6906 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02808 NALEFD 1530-6984
(2018).
Google Scholar
E. Khaidarov et al.,
“Control of LED emission with functional dielectric metasurfaces,”
Laser Photonics Rev., 14 1900235 https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201900235
(2020).
Google Scholar
P. P. Iyer et al.,
“Unidirectional luminescence from InGaN/GaN quantum-well metasurfaces,”
Nat. Photonics, 14 543 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-020-0641-x NPAHBY 1749-4885
(2020).
Google Scholar
P. Spinelli, M. A. Verschuuren, and A. Polman,
“Broadband omnidirectional antireflection coating based on subwavelength surface Mie resonators,”
Nat. Commun., 3 692 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1691 NCAOBW 2041-1723
(2012).
Google Scholar
V. Neder, S. L. Luxembourg, and A. Polman,
“Efficient colored silicon solar modules using integrated resonant dielectric nanoscatterers,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., 111 073902 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4986796 APPLAB 0003-6951
(2017).
Google Scholar
N. Lee et al.,
“Multi-resonant MIE resonator arrays for broadband light trapping in ultrathin c-Si solar cells,”
Adv. Mater., 35 2210941 https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202210941 ADVMEW 0935-9648
(2023).
Google Scholar
C. J. Chang-Hasnain and W. Yang,
“High-contrast gratings as a new platform for integrated optoelectronics,”
Semicond. Sci. Technol., 26 014043 https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/26/1/014043 SSTEET 0268-1242
(2011).
Google Scholar
Y. Y. Xie et al.,
“Metasurface-integrated vertical cavity surface-emitting lasers for programmable directional lasing emissions,”
Nat. Nanotechnol., 15 125 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0611-y NNAABX 1748-3387
(2020).
Google Scholar
W. Joo et al.,
“Metasurface-driven OLED displays beyond 10,000 pixels per inch,”
Science, 370 459 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc8530 SCIEAS 0036-8075
(2020).
Google Scholar
S. I. Bozhevolnyi and N. A. Mortensen,
“Plasmonics for emerging quantum technologies,”
Nanophotonics, 6 1185 https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2016-0179
(2017).
Google Scholar
T. Stav et al.,
“Quantum entanglement of the spin and orbital angular momentum of photons using metamaterials,”
Science, 361 1101 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat9042 SCIEAS 0036-8075
(2018).
Google Scholar
L. Li et al.,
“Metalens-array–based high-dimensional and multiphoton quantum source,”
Science, 368 1487 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba9779 SCIEAS 0036-8075
(2020).
Google Scholar
H. Kwon et al.,
“Nonlocal metasurfaces for optical signal processing,”
Phys. Rev. Lett., 121 173004 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.173004 PRLTAO 0031-9007
(2018).
Google Scholar
C. Guo et al.,
“Photonic crystal slab Laplace operator for image differentiation,”
Optica, 5 251 https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.5.000251
(2018).
Google Scholar
V. Sitzmann et al.,
“End-to-end optimization of optics and image processing for achromatic extended depth of field and super-resolution imaging,”
ACM Trans. Graph., 37 1 https://doi.org/10.1145/3197517.3201333 ATGRDF 0730-0301
(2018).
Google Scholar
G. Wetzstein et al.,
“Inference in artificial intelligence with deep optics and photonics,”
Nature, 588 39 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2973-6
(2020).
Google Scholar
A. Ji et al.,
“Quantitative phase contrast imaging with a nonlocal angle-selective metasurface,”
Nat. Commun., 13 7848 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34197-6 NCAOBW 2041-1723
(2022).
Google Scholar
J. Hu et al.,
“Diffractive optical computing in free space,”
Nat. Commun., 15 1525 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45982-w NCAOBW 2041-1723
(2024).
Google Scholar
E. Tseng et al.,
“Neural nano-optics for high-quality thin lens imaging,”
Nat. Commun., 12 6493 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26443-0 NCAOBW 2041-1723
(2021).
Google Scholar
S. Pinilla et al.,
“Miniature color camera via flat hybrid meta-optics,”
Sci. Adv., 9 eadg7297 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg7297 STAMCV 1468-6996
(2023).
Google Scholar
|