Boo-Hyun Ham, Il-Hwan Kim, Sung-Sik Park, Sun-Young Yeo, Sang-Jin Kim, Dong-Woon Park, Joon-Soo Park, Chang-Hoon Ryu, Bo-Kyeong Son, Kyung-Bae Hwang, Jae-Min Shin, Jangho Shin, Ki-Yeop Park, Sean Park, Lei Liu, Ming-Chun Tien, Angelique Nachtwein, Marinus Jochemsen, Philip Yan, Vincent Hu, Christopher Jones
As critical dimensions for advanced two dimensional (2D) DUV patterning continue to shrink, the exact process window becomes increasingly difficult to determine. The defect size criteria shrink with the patterning critical dimensions and are well below the resolution of current optical inspection tools. As a result, it is more challenging for traditional bright field inspection tools to accurately discover the hotspots that define the process window. In this study, we use a novel computational inspection method to identify the depth-of-focus limiting features of a 10 nm node mask with 2D metal structures (single exposure) and compare the results to those obtained with a traditional process windows qualification (PWQ) method based on utilizing a focus modulated wafer and bright field inspection (BFI) to detect hotspot defects. The method is extended to litho-etch litho-etch (LELE) on a different test vehicle to show that overlay related bridging hotspots also can be identified.
ArF is still being used as a main light source for lithography of critical layers due to development delay of alternative
light sources. The resolution enhancement is therefore mainly depends on increasing the NA of the projection lens or on
decreasing the k1 value. Depth-of-focus is becoming narrower in both the approaches than ever. It has been well-known
that properly designed assist-features can improve the process window of lithography, but optimizing assist-features is
generally not a simple task, unless the pattern area is small or all the patterns are well isolated so that the proximity
effect can be safely ignored. It is challenging to generate assist-features automatically when the pattern area is not small
or the patterns are not well isolated, both of which is not a case in today's memory devices. Today's memory chip has
such a large pattern area that it easily occupies a large portion of the available imaging field of today's scanner. The
proximity effect cannot be safely ignored because k1 factor is low in today's memory devices and the patterns are not
isolated even in peripherals. A new method to generate assist-features has been internally developed. This method is
based on optical simulation and utilizes the optical characteristic of the exposure tool to maximize the process margin,
and is scalable to the full-chip scale. Side-lobes are automatically suppressed well under the imaging threshold. The
total processing time is comparable to a usual model OPC processing time. The present paper demonstrates a test case
of this new method to a contact layer of full-chip sub-70nm DRAM device and the improvement of depth-of-focus. The
increased depth-of-focus was equivalent to 18% reduction of contact CD at the same depth-of-focus.
Since numerical aperture (NA) becomes greater than 1.0 in immersion lithography, polarization effect will be one of the critical issues in imaging performance. In patterning 40nm or smaller node with 193nm wavelength, transverse magnetic (TM) polarized beam does not contribute to image contrast. Hence most layers will require polarization controlled illumination to prevent the contrast degradation. For this reason, polarization controllability of illumination becomes one of considerable budget of critical dimension (CD) variation. For CD uniformity control of exposure tool and CD budget analysis, it is necessary to measure the polarization performance of illumination system. In-situ or special measurement tools are currently being developed to measure the polarization state of illumination and projection optics. However, each tool maker has its own measurement tool, and consequently in order to compare the polarization performance across different tools, a common measurement method is required. In this paper, a special mask pattern for monitoring polarization state of illumination has been designed. The polarization degrees have been measured for polarized illuminations of 193nm high NA tool. The pattern shape has been designed based on electric magnetic field (EMF) simulation utilizing the diffraction efficiency difference. The actual mask pattern sizes are measured to correct the measurement error. Differences between the EMF simulation and the real exposure results have been investigated for several illumination shapes and for different polarization status.
For a lithography process, process windows are conventionally determined based on the amount of CD variation in a focus-exposure matrix (FEM). In a low-k1 region, however, a real process window can be smaller than is determined by the CD variation of FEM, due to a large mask error enhancement factor (MEEF). And the real process window cannot be determined by simply narrowing the process window obtained from a FEM, since MEEF itself is not a constant but a function of various process parameters. All the parameters which can affect MEEF should be considered carefully both in evaluation and in optimization of a real process window. Aerial-image base simulation was avoided in calculation of a process window because aerial-image based simulation cannot properly predict a process window even for simple 1-dimensional line-and-space patterns without introducing a fictitious variable like iso-focal bias, which cannot be extended to general 2-dimensional cases. In this study, a modified procedure for evaluation of process windows of critical layers has been proposed, and the process window was compared to the process window obtained by a conventional procedure. The proposed procedure has been implemented in our in-house lithography simulator to automatically process the evaluation of real process windows. Since the proposed procedure heavily relies on the accuracy of the lithography simulator, consideration of mask corner rounding effect and careful tuning of the physical properties of photoresists among others have also been included to guarantee the overall simulation accuracy.
Due to the polarization effect of high NA lithography, the consideration of resist effect in lithography simulation becomes increasingly important. In spite of the importance of resist simulation, many process engineers are reluctant to consider resist effect in lithography simulation due to time-consuming procedure to extract required resist parameters and the uncertainty of measurement of some parameters. Weiss suggested simplified development model, and this model does not require the complex kinetic parameters. For the device fabrication engineers, there is a simple and accurate parameter extraction and optimizing method using Weiss model. This method needs refractive index, Dill’s parameters and development rate monitoring (DRM) data in parameter extraction. The parameters extracted using referred sequence is not accurate, so that we have to optimize the parameters to fit the critical dimension scanning electron microscopy (CD SEM) data of line and space patterns. Hence, the FiRM of Sigma-C is utilized as a resist parameter-optimizing program. According to our study, the illumination shape, the aberration and the pupil mesh point have a large effect on the accuracy of resist parameter in optimization. To obtain the optimum parameters, we need to find the saturated mesh points in terms of normalized intensity log slope (NILS) prior to an optimization. The simulation results using the optimized parameters by this method shows good agreement with experiments for iso-dense bias, Focus-Exposure Matrix data and sub 80nm device pattern simulation.
In this article, an advanced module-based approach is introduced to simulate sub-100 nm patterns. Topography (TOPO), an in-house lithography simulator, consists of four basic modules: i) illumination, ii) mask, iii) imaging, and iv) resist. Since TOPO is module-based, it is convenient for user specific applications. The input parameter of illumination module is pupil intensity profile, which is measured using the transmission image sensor of ASML. In the mask kernel, mask corner rounding effect is considered while imaging module takes care of lens aberration and flare problems. Finally, the resist module uses Gaussian convolution model with the trade-off in mind between accuracy of full resist model and speed of Gaussian convolution model. As an application example, an iso-dense bias (ID bias) fitting is implemented for an ArF resist to image sub-100 nm patterns. Simulation results show that the fitting error meets the prediction accuracy target of International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors 2002. The advanced module-based model using aerial image with measured pupil intensity profile and Gaussian convolution seems to be an effective way for the CD prediction of sub-100 nm patterns.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.