Dr. Fulgencio Cánovas-García Profile

Dr. Fulgencio Cánovas-García

Postdoctoral Researcher at Univ Politécnica de Cartagena

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (2)

Proceedings Article | 2 November 2017 Open Access

Validation of a global satellite rainfall product for real time monitoring of meteorological extremes

Fulgencio Cánovas-García, Sandra García-Galiano, Negar Karbalaee

Proceedings Volume 10421, 1042109 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2278398

KEYWORDS: Meteorology, Error analysis, Satellites, Floods, Agriculture, Meteorological satellites, Artificial neural networks, Clouds, Classification systems, Climatology

Read Abstract +

The real time monitoring of storms is important for the management and prevention of flood risks. However, in the southeast of Spain, it seems that the density of the rain gauge network may not be sufficient to adequately characterize the rainfall spatial distribution or the high rainfall intensities that are reached during storms. Satellite precipitation products such as PERSIANN-CCS (Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks - Cloud Classification System) could be used to complement the automatic rain gauge networks and so help solve this problem. However, the PERSIANN-CCS product has only recently become available, so its operational validity for areas such as south-eastern Spain is not yet known. In this work, a methodology for the hourly validation of PERSIANN-CCS is presented. We used the rain gauge stations of the SIAM (Sistema de Información Agraria de Murcia) network to study three storms with a very high return period. These storms hit the east and southeast of the Iberian Peninsula and resulted in the loss of human life, major damage to agricultural crops and a strong impact on many different types of infrastructure. The study area is the province of Murcia (Region of Murcia), located in the southeast of the Iberian Peninsula, covering an area of more than 11,000 km2 and with a population of almost 1.5 million. In order to validate the PERSIANN-CCS product for these three storms, contrasts were made with the hyetographs registered by the automatic rain gauges, analyzing statistics such as bias, mean square difference and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Although in some cases the temporal distribution of rainfall was well captured by PERSIANN-CCS, in several rain gauges high intensities were not properly represented. The differences were strongly correlated with the rain gauge precipitation, but not with satellite-obtained rainfall. The main conclusion concerns the need for specific local calibration for the study area if PERSIANN-CCS is to be used as an operational tool for the monitoring of extreme meteorological phenomena.

DOWNLOAD PAPER

Proceedings Article | 4 October 2017 Open Access

Implementing and validating of pan-sharpening algorithms in open-source software

Paúl Pesántez-Cobos, Fulgencio Cánovas-García, Francisco Alonso-Sarría

Proceedings Volume 10427, 104271E (2017) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2277543

KEYWORDS: Earth observing sensors, Image fusion, High resolution satellite images, Image quality, Image enhancement, Linear filtering, Principal component analysis, Multispectral imaging, Image analysis

Read Abstract +

Several approaches have been used in remote sensing to integrate images with different spectral and spatial resolutions in order to obtain fused enhanced images. The objective of this research is three-fold. To implement in R three image fusion techniques (High Pass Filter, Principal Component Analysis and Gram-Schmidt); to apply these techniques to merging multispectral and panchromatic images from five different images with different spatial resolutions; finally, to evaluate the results using the universal image quality index (Q index) and the ERGAS index. As regards qualitative analysis, Landsat-7 and Landsat-8 show greater colour distortion with the three pansharpening methods, although the results for the other images were better. Q index revealed that HPF fusion performs better for the QuickBird, IKONOS and Landsat-7 images, followed by GS fusion; whereas in the case of Landsat-8 and Natmur-08 images, the results were more even. Regarding the ERGAS spatial index, the ACP algorithm performed better for the QuickBird, IKONOS, Landsat-7 and Natmur-08 images, followed closely by the GS algorithm. Only for the Landsat-8 image did, the GS fusion present the best result. In the evaluation of spectral components, HPF results tended to be better and ACP results worse, the opposite was the case with the spatial components. Better quantitative results are obtained in Landsat-7 and Landsat-8 images with the three fusion methods than with the QuickBird, IKONOS and Natmur-08 images. This contrasts with the qualitative evaluation reflecting the importance of splitting the two evaluation approaches (qualitative and quantitative). Significant disagreement may arise when different methodologies are used to asses the quality of an image fusion. Moreover, it is not possible to designate, a priori, a given algorithm as the best, not only because of the different characteristics of the sensors, but also because of the different atmospherics conditions or peculiarities of the different study areas, among other reasons.

DOWNLOAD PAPER

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years