Magnetic Singularity Identification (MSI) is a technique that is used to determine the unique natural resonances of metallic objects such as land mines. Dyadic MSI theory is extended herein to rotationally symmetric metal mines, including formalization of an averaged data waveform of individual measurements taken over multiple illumination polarizations. Identification of threat target objects and discrimination against innocuous metal clutter items by pole extraction techniques in real time is viable, but is highly computationally intensive and pushes the state-of-the-art of real-time computing systems. Simpler and faster alternative identification/discrimination algorithms are sought. One promising candidate is the E-pulse technique, or a modification thereof called the ξ-pulse. This note addresses the specific application of the E-pulse approach to metallic targets where three distinct exponential decay terms can be extracted using MSI techniques. These decay terms, obtained from calibration runs in non-real time, are used to build a library of known threat targets and corresponding E-pulse waveforms. These are used in turn to provide a mine discrimination metric in real time in the field.
The Ground Standoff Mine Detection System (GSTAMIDS) is now in the Engineering, Manufacturing and Development (EMD) Block 0 phase for USA CECOM. The Mine Detection Subsystem (MDS) presently utilizes three different sensor technologies to detect buried anti-tank (AT) land mines; Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), Pulsed Magnetic Induction (PMI), and passive infrared (IR). The GSTAMIDS hardware and software architectures are designed so that other technologies can readily be incorporated when and if they prove viable. Each sensor suite is designed to detect the buried mines and to discriminate against various clutter and background objects. Sensor data fusion of the outputs of the individual sensor suites then enhances the detection probability while reducing the false alarm rate from clutter objects. The metal detector is an essential tool for buried mine detection, as metal land mines still account for a large percentage of land mines. Technologies such as nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR or QR) are presently being developed to detect or confirm the presence of explosive material in buried land mines, particularly the so-called plastic mines; unfortunately, the radio frequency signals required cannot penetrate into a metal land mine. The limitation of the metal detector is not in detection of the metal mines, but in the additional detection of metal clutter. A metal detector has been developed using singular value decomposition (SVD) extraction techniques to discriminate the mines from the clutter, thereby greatly reducing false alarm rates. This mine detector is designed to characterize the impulse response function of the metal objects, based on a parametric three-pole model of the response, and to use pattern recognition to determine the match of the responses to known mines. In addition to discrimination against clutter, the system can also generally tell one mine type from another. This paper describes the PMI sensor suite hardware and its physical incorporation into the GSTAMIDS sensor modules. This is a time-domain, transient signal metal detector that gives target signal response information of a different nature than that from more conventional continuous-wave (CW) metal detectors. The magnetic design of the GSTAMIDS PMI has very broad-band radiation properties that allow for the required transient eddy current responses in the metallic targets. The design of this detector is unique in that it allows processing of the received signals from targets to begin at the very start of the eddy current decays. This then gives the ability to measure and quantify up to three decay terms in the target response, which features unambiguously identify the particular threat target. The results of the data processing algorithms that are used to extract the features used for mine detection are included herein to more clearly show the mine signals.
KEYWORDS: Mining, General packet radio service, Sensors, Land mines, Deconvolution, Data acquisition, Data processing, Detection and tracking algorithms, Signal processing, Reflection
The Ground Standoff Mine Detection System is now in the Engineering, Manufacturing and Development (EMD) Block 0 phase for USA CECOM. This paper describes the data processing algorithms for the GPR that are used to extract the features used for anti-tank (AT) mine detection; those used for pre-processing the data re included herein to show the enhancement of the mine signals. A key feature of the processing is the acquisition of a clean radar return signal from undisturbed soil, which is then deconvolved from each data frame waveform. This soil signal is an estimate of the system impulse response function, save for the magnitude of the reflection coefficient of the soil, which is a scalar to first order. Deconvolution thus gives the impulse response function of the buried mines, a strong enhancement over their raw measured signals. A matched filter test statistic is generated to discriminate between mines and background. Discrimination algorithms using hidden Markov model processing are describe in a paper by PD Gader et al. These processes were developed in MATLAB using dat files acquired and stored from prototype GPR systems and then refined with data form production units. The MATLAB code is then converted into C code for use on the real-time processor on GSTAMIDS. The C code modules are run as dynamic library links in MATLAB for verification. The GPR sensor suite hardware and its physical incorporation into the GSTAMIDS sensor modules are described fully in a companion paper.
KEYWORDS: Metals, Land mines, Sensors, Mining, Magnetism, Data processing, Data modeling, Detection and tracking algorithms, Target detection, Signal processing
The Ground Standoff Mine Detection System (GSTAMIDS) is now in the Engineering, Manufacturing and Development (EMD) Block 0 phase for USA CECOM. The Mine Detection Subsystem (MDS) presently utilizes three different sensor technologies to detect buried anti-tank (AT) land mines; Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), Pulsed Magnetic Induction (PMI), and passive infrared (IR). The GSTAMIDS hardware and software architectures are designed so that other technologies can readily be incorporated when and if they prove viable. Each sensor suite is designed to detect the buried mines and to discriminate against various clutter and background objects. Sensor data fusion of the outputs of the individual sensor suites then enhances the detection probability while reducing the false alarm rate from clutter objects. The metal detector is an essential tool for buried mine detection, as metal land mines still account for a large percentage of land mines. Technologies such as nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR or QR) are presently being developed to detect or confirm the presence of explosive material in buried land mines, particularly the so-called plastic mines; unfortunately, the radio frequency signals required cannot penetrate into a metal land mine. The limitation of the metal detector is not in detection of the metal mines, but in the additional detection of metal clutter. A metal detector has been developed using singular value decomposition (SVD) extraction techniques to discriminate the mines from the clutter, thereby greatly reducing false alarm rates. This mine detector is designed to characterize the impulse response function of the metal objects, based on a parametric three-pole model of the response, and to use pattern recognition to determine the match of the responses to known mines. In addition to discrimination against clutter, the system can also generally tell one mine type from another. This paper describes the PMI sensor suite hardware and its physical incorporation into the GSTAMIDS sensor modules. This is a time-domain, transient signal metal detector that gives target signal response information of a different nature than that from more conventional continuous-wave (CW) metal detectors. The magnetic design of the GSTAMIDS PMI has very broad-band radiation properties that allow for the required transient eddy current responses in the metallic targets. The design of this detector is unique in that it allows processing of the received signals from targets to begin at the very start of the eddy current decays (t = 0). This then gives the ability to measure and quantify up to three decay terms in the target response, which features unambiguously identify the particular threat target. The results of the data processing algorithms that are used to extract the features used for mine detection are included herein to more clearly show the mine signals.
KEYWORDS: Sensors, Land mines, General packet radio service, Mining, Metals, Control systems, Vehicle control, Cameras, Long wavelength infrared, Antennas
The United States Army has contracted EG&G Technical Services to build the GSTAMIDS EMD Block 0. This system autonomously detects and marks buried anti-tank land mines from an unmanned vehicle. It consists of a remotely operated host vehicle, standard teleoperation system (STS) control, mine detection system (MDS) and a control vehicle. Two complete systems are being fabricated, along with a third MDS. The host vehicle for Block 0 is the South African Meerkat that has overpass capability for anti-tank mines, as well as armor anti-mine blast protection and ballistic protection. It is operated via the STS radio link from within the control vehicle. The Main Computer System (MCS), located in the control vehicle, receives sensor data from the MDS via a high speed radio link, processes and fuses the data to make a decision of a mine detection, and sends the information back to the host vehicle for a mark to be placed on the mine location. The MCS also has the capability to interface into the FBCB2 system via SINGARS radio. The GSTAMIDS operator station and the control vehicle communications system also connect to the MCS. The MDS sensors are mounted on the host vehicle and include Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), Pulsed Magnetic Induction (PMI) metal detector, and (as an option) long-wave infrared (LWIR). A distributed processing architecture is used so that pre-processing is performed on data at the sensor level before transmission to the MCS, minimizing required throughput. Nine (9) channels each of GPR and PMI are mounted underneath the meerkat to provide a three-meter detection swath. Two IR cameras are mounted on the upper sides of the Meerkat, providing a field of view of the required swath with overlap underneath the vehicle. Also included on the host vehicle are an Internal Navigation System (INS), Global Positioning System (GPS), and radio communications for remote control and data transmission. The GSTAMIDS Block 0 is designed as a modular, expandable system with sufficient bandwidth and processing capability for incorporation of additional sensor systems in future Blocks. It is also designed to operate in adverse weather conditions and to be transportable around the world.
KEYWORDS: General packet radio service, Mining, Signal detection, Data processing, Receivers, Signal processing, Interference (communication), Sensors, Statistical analysis, Mathematical modeling
We apply high-dimensional analysis of variance (HANOVA) and sequential probability ratio test (SPRT) to detect buried land mines from array ground penetrating radar (GPR) measurements. The GPR array surveys a region of interest in a progressive manner starting at a known position and moving step by step in a fixed direction. Our detection method consists of two stages. Because, at each stop of the array the path lengths are different from every transmitter/receiver pair to a mien target, there exists statistically significant difference among received signals when a mine target is presented. Thus, the first step in our processing consists of a HANOVA test to detect this statistical difference at each stop. HANOVA does not incorporate new data as the GPR array moves down-track. So secondly, we resort to a sequential probability ratio test to look for changes in the HANOVA statistics as the array proceeds down track. The SPRT allows for real-time processing as anew data are obtained by the GPR array. Finally, real sensor data are processed to verify the method.
Metal land mines still account for a large percentage of land mines, even with the advent of the so-called plastic mines. The metal detector thus remains a viable tool in the mine detector's bag. The limitation of the metal detector is not in detection of the mines, but in the additional detection of metal clutter. A metal detector has been developed which can largely discriminate the mines for the clutter, thereby greatly reducing false alarm rates. This 'mine detector' is designed to characterize the magnetic polarizability dyadic of the metal objects, and to use pattern recognition to determine the goodness-of-fit to the responses of known mines. Data are presented from test runs conducted for the US Army for buried metal miens. Data are also presented for some non-mine metal targets. The characterization of the mines as threats is performed in a totally autonomous system, with high probability-of- detection and low false alarm rate. We can also generally tell one mine type from another.
KEYWORDS: Land mines, Magnetism, Metals, Sensors, Electromagnetism, Mining, Digital signal processing, Target detection, Signal processing, General packet radio service
The detection of land mines has two fundamental goals: the first is a high detection rate (low probability of missing a mine) and the second is a low false alarm rate. Detection of mines and mine-like objects is generally not difficult; the problem is the high false-alarm rate caused by detection of innocuous objects such as shrapnel or metal junk, or even rocks or voids in the soil. The problem is one of discrimination, not one of detection. In order to maximize the success of achieving this goal, a mine detector needs to incorporate many complementary sensor technologies and to utilize the concept of sensor data fusion. Two subsystems employ new signal processing techniques which extract certain features from the data that are unique identifiers on the mines. These features are the natural magentic and electromagnetic resonances, which form the impulse response function, or equivalently, the natural frequencies represented by poles in the complex frequency plane. For different objects these are sufficiently distinct that pattern recognition processes can be used to arrive at a probability of a match to a particular mine.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.