Mr. Ido Abergel Profile

Ido Abergel

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (1)

This will count as one of your downloads.

You will have access to both the presentation and article (if available).

DOWNLOAD NOW

This content is available for download via your institution's subscription. To access this item, please sign in to your personal account.

Email or Username Forgot your username?

Password Forgot your password?

Show

Keep me signed in

No SPIE account? Create an account

Proceedings Article | 24 April 2020 Presentation + Paper

Non-negative matrix factorization for hyperspectral anomaly detection

Sofia Aizenshtein, Ido Abergel, Moshe Mailler, Gili Segal, Stanley Rotman

Proceedings Volume 11392, 1139210 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2553374

KEYWORDS: Detection and tracking algorithms, Hyperspectral imaging, Image processing algorithms and systems, Matrices, Algorithm development, Signal to noise ratio, Hyperspectral target detection, Target detection

Read Abstract +

A common anomaly detection algorithm for hyperspectral imagery is the RX algorithm based on the Mahalanobis distance of each pixel from the image mean. This is a benchmark algorithm which can be applied either directly on a hyperspectral image or on a dimensionality-reduced hyperspectral image. Recent work on Non-Negative Matrix Factorization (NNMF) provides a fast-iterative algorithm for decomposing a hyperspectral cube and achieving dimensionality reduction. In this paper, we study the implementation of the NNMF algorithm on a hyperspectral data cube and propose two new anomaly detection algorithms, based on combining the NNMF and the RX algorithms. In the first version, we apply the NNMF algorithm on a hyperspectral image reducing the dimensionality; we then apply the RX algorithm. In the second version, we segment and cluster the dataset after applying the NNMF algorithm. Anomaly detection is then performed on this dataset. Using either of these algorithms overcomes a weakness of the RX algorithm in handling background clusters which are close to each other. The algorithm was tested on the RIT blind test dataset. From our results, we conclude that the two versions of the algorithm are sensitive to different types of anomalies; a two-dimensional scatterplot of the data comparing the RX values to either of the NNMF algorithms enables us to distinguish between the anomaly types. The ground truth shows that we have achieved high accuracy and less false alarms.

My Library

You currently do not have any folders to save your paper to! Create a new folder below.

Folder Name

Folder Description

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks. You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*

*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please sign in to access your institution's subscriptions.

To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on SPIE.org.

ORGANIZATIONAL
Sign in with credentials provided by your organization.

Organizational Username

Organizational Password

Show/Hide Password

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members:

Non-members: ADD TO CART

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years