Dr. Gabriel Barros-Gavilanes Profile

Dr. Gabriel Barros-Gavilanes

Researcher at Univ del Azuay

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (1)

This will count as one of your downloads.

You will have access to both the presentation and article (if available).

DOWNLOAD NOW

This content is available for download via your institution's subscription. To access this item, please sign in to your personal account.

Email or Username Forgot your username?

Password Forgot your password?

Show

Keep me signed in

No SPIE account? Create an account

Proceedings Article | 19 September 2019 Presentation + Paper

Edge vs. cloud computing: where to do image processing for surveillance?

Andrés Heredia, Gabriel Barros-Gavilanes

Proc. SPIE. 11169, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Defense Applications

KEYWORDS: Roads, Video acceleration, Detection and tracking algorithms, Data modeling, Cameras, Image processing, Video, Video surveillance, Surveillance, Video processing

Read Abstract +

Surveillance applications require transmission of video flows to a high performance remote server or perform onsite processing. In both cases, image analysis techniques are used to support tasks for situational awareness, such as: detection, classification, and tracking. Nowadays, neural networks are widely used as data driven Machine Learning methods. The hardware required for deploying state-of-the-art neural networks models implies massive and invasive installations. Embedded devices could be an alternative running with more modest settings. Then, it is important to understand which trade-off is better for this surveillance application. When a new camera angle lead to an unknown scenario, detection and classification deteriorates in terms of precision and recall. To solve this problem we analyze and predict the angles in different scenarios using homography techniques. We proposed the inclusion of more data sets and labeled images from different angles. This means that more images does not always mean better detection. We have a model by transfer of learning with images from scenarios with similar angles to the real environments of detection. We compare the performance of different implementations of an automated counter in an embedded device using a GPU versus a server performing the same task. Results show that an Edge computing implementation is possible with a good performance. Possible solutions involve regulating bit rate and skipping a specific number of frames (skip-n-frames) to rise the number of Frames per Second of the system. The results show that using both: an embedded device and a server is possible to perform real-time object detection and counting with precision values of around 92% in the embedded device and 93% in a server.

My Library

You currently do not have any folders to save your paper to! Create a new folder below.

Folder Name

Folder Description

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks. You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*

*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please sign in to access your institution's subscriptions.

To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print format on SPIE.org.

PERSONAL SIGN IN
Full access may be available with your subscription

Email or Username Forgot your username?

Password Forgot your password?

Show

Keep me signed in

No SPIE account? Create an account

Institutional Access:

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

INTERESTED IN A FREE CORPORATE TRIAL?

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members:

Non-members: ADD TO CART

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years