Conventional scanning laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV) systems cannot be effectively employed with impact excitation
because they typically measure a structure's response at only one point at a time. This necessitates exciting the structure at
multiple points to create a multi-input-single-output modal test data base, which is not only tedious, but prone to errors due to
variations in the impact characteristics from one point to the next. Previous works have demonstrated that an LDV can
be used to measure the mode shapes of a structure over a surface by scanning the laser spot continuously as the structure's
response decays. The author recently presented a procedure that allows one to post-process continuous-scan LDV
(CSLDV) measurements of the free decay of a structure using standard modal parameter identification techniques. Using this
approach, one can find the natural frequencies, damping ratios and mode shapes of a structure at hundreds of points
simultaneously from a few free responses. The procedure employs a novel resampling approach to transform the continuous-scan
measurements into pseudo-frequency response functions, fits a complex mode model, and then accounts for the time
delay between samples to obtain the mode shapes. This paper extends the previous work by presenting an algorithm that uses
the input force spectrum, measured by an instrumented hammer, to mass normalize the mode shapes obtained using the
continuous-scan LDV process. Other issues such as the effect of the scan frequency on the procedure and on speckle noise
are also briefly addressed.
One powerful method for measuring the motion of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) relies on a Laser Doppler
Vibrometer (LDV) focused through an optical microscope. Recent data taken under a very simple and common
condition demonstrate that the velocity signal produced by the LDV with an optical microscope may be different from
the velocity signal produced by the LDV without a microscope. This is especially important if one wishes to estimate
acceleration by differentiating velocity. In this study, the time derivatives of LDV signals are compared against the
signal from an accelerometer when the LDV is focused through an optical microscope and without the microscope
system. The signal from the LDV without the microscope is almost identical to the accelerometer signal. In contrast, the
signal from the LDV with the microscope exhibits a nonlinear relationship with the accelerometer signal. Both the LDV
and the accelerometer were measuring a sinusoidal velocity generated by an electromechanical shaker. The Fourier
transform of the acceleration from the LDV with the microscope shows a multitude of high harmonics of the excitation
frequency, which have much higher amplitudes than the harmonics present in the accelerometer signal. Without the
microscope, the LDV gives a much less distorted sinusoidal signal, even after time differentiation. The distortion of the
signal from the LDV is periodic, with the same period as the sinusoidal drive signal. The largest distortion occurs near
points of maximum negative acceleration, corresponding to the positive displacement peak of the sinusoidal oscillation.
Because the measured oscillation is out of plane, pseudo-vibrations caused by speckle noise do not explain the distortion.
Instead, the distortion appears to be caused by the optics of the microscope.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.