Comparison of two different techniques to determine the cloud cover from all-sky imagery

Pedro C. Valdelomar; José L. Gómez-Amo; Francesco Scarlatti; Caterina Peris-Ferrús; Maria P. Utrillas

doi:10.1117/12.2599517

12 September 2021 Comparison of two different techniques to determine the cloud cover from all-sky imagery

Pedro C. Valdelomar, José L. Gómez-Amo, Francesco Scarlatti, Caterina Peris-Ferrús, Maria P. Utrillas

Proceedings Volume 11859, Remote Sensing of Clouds and the Atmosphere XXVI; 118590V (2021) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2599517
Event: SPIE Remote Sensing, 2021, Online Only

Conference Poster

Abstract

All sky-cameras are devices with a very high potential in order to study atmospheric phenomena and were originally designed to obtain the cloud cover. However, methods based in different approaches produce significant differences in the results. State-of-art methods usually offer better performance, thanks to computer vision and machine learning (ML) techniques, than traditional algorithms based on channel ratios using both fixed and adaptive thresholds to classify the pixels of one image as cloud or cloud free. We have developed a cloud cover adaptive threshold algorithm base on Probability Density Function (PDF) of the Blue to Red Ratio (BRR), standing out in: simplicity; ease of implementation; compatibility with any sky-camera in terms of technical requirement and type of image acquisition. The goal of this study is to compare our algorithm with a most fashionable method based on Machine learning, discovering the pros and cons of each one and weather ultimately less can be more. The comparison has been done using a set of 1-year HDR imagery database, representing a wider range of atmospheric scenarios such as clear sky, cloudy, partly cloudy and different types of aerosol conditions and clouds such as cirrus, cumulus, stratum and nimbus. To stablish a quantitative comparison of both methods, a limited set of images has been chosen. The PDF method show better agreement than our ML implementation, with a better performance for all weather conditions, in comparison against our cloud cover database.

Conference Presentation

Citation Download Citation

Pedro C. Valdelomar, José L. Gómez-Amo, Francesco Scarlatti, Caterina Peris-Ferrús, and Maria P. Utrillas "Comparison of two different techniques to determine the cloud cover from all-sky imagery", Proc. SPIE 11859, Remote Sensing of Clouds and the Atmosphere XXVI, 118590V (12 September 2021); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2599517

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available