Effects Of Defocus On Photolithographic Images Obtained With Projection-Printing Systems

M. A. Narasimham; J. H. Carter Jr.

doi:10.1117/12.956106

6 September 1978 Effects Of Defocus On Photolithographic Images Obtained With Projection-Printing Systems

M. A. Narasimham, J. H. Carter Jr.

Proceedings Volume 0135, Developments in Semiconductor Microlithography III; (1978) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.956106
Event: Developments in Semiconductor Microlithography III, 1978, San Jose, United States

Abstract

The images etched in a positive photoresist layer by means of polychromatic exposures and all-reflective projection printing methods can be described by a model presented elsewhere. For that model, the lateral intensity distributions of the optical image need be computed only at a single effective exposure wavelength that is compatible with a properly focused resist image profile. Although the illumination in the optical system we used was partially coherent, we successfully used the effective enhanced numerical aperture for the system, and calculated the lateral intensity distribution in the optical image on the assumption of incoherent illumination. In this study, we deposited a layer of Al over a Si substrate wafer which we then coated with a layer of quartz and a layer of positive photoresist. We calculated the dynamic exposure response of the photoresist film by using the modulation transfer function of a defocused perfect lens in order to simulate the resist images from zero to a few Rayleigh units of defocus. Simulated and experimentally determined resist image profiles and linewidths were compared and shown to be in good agreement. The results of this comparison lead us to believe that defocusing at the time of our study was caused by a tilt of the wafer along the scan axis.

Citation Download Citation

M. A. Narasimham and J. H. Carter Jr. "Effects Of Defocus On Photolithographic Images Obtained With Projection-Printing Systems", Proc. SPIE 0135, Developments in Semiconductor Microlithography III, (6 September 1978); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.956106

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available