Performance metrics for point target detection in consecutive frame IR imagery

Jerry Silverman; Charlene E. Caefer; Jonathan Martin Mooney

doi:10.1117/12.217680

1 September 1995 Performance metrics for point target detection in consecutive frame IR imagery

Jerry Silverman, Charlene E. Caefer, Jonathan Martin Mooney

Proceedings Volume 2561, Signal and Data Processing of Small Targets 1995; (1995) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.217680
Event: SPIE's 1995 International Symposium on Optical Science, Engineering, and Instrumentation, 1995, San Diego, CA, United States

Abstract

In the companion paper, two algorithms for tracking point targets in consecutive frame staring IR imagery with evolving cloud clutter are described and compared by using representative example scenes. Here, our total data base of local airborne scenes with targets of opportunity are used for a more quantitative and comprehensive comparison. The use of real world data as well as our focus on temporal filtering over large number of consecutive frames triggered a search for more relevant metrics than those available. We present two new metrics which have most of the attributes sought. In each metric, gain is taken as a ratio of output to input signal to clutter. Maximum values rather than statistical measures are used for clutter. In the variation metric (VM), a temporal standard deviation for each pixel over 95 consecutive frames is computed and the maximum non-target result is taken as the input clutter. The input signal, a real target moving with sub-pixel velocity through sampled imagery, is estimated by a reference mean technique. Output signal and clutter are taken as maximum target and clutter affected pixels in algorithm filtered outputs. In the second metric, the use of an anti-median filter (AM) provides symmetric treatment of input and output as well as signal and clutter. The maximum target and non-target response to the AM filter on input frames and output frames defines the signal and clutter measures. Our set of real-world data is plotted as output versus input signal to clutter for each metric and each algorithm and the pros and cons of each metric is discussed. With either metric, the signal to clutter gain ratios are approximately 5 - 6 dB greater with the temporal filter algorithm than with the velocity filter algorithm.

Citation Download Citation

Jerry Silverman, Charlene E. Caefer, and Jonathan Martin Mooney "Performance metrics for point target detection in consecutive frame IR imagery", Proc. SPIE 2561, Signal and Data Processing of Small Targets 1995, (1 September 1995); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.217680

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available