Factors that determine the optimum reduction factor for wafer steppers

Harry J. Levinson; Paul W. Ackmann; Moshe E. Preil; William T. Rericha

doi:10.1117/12.350834

14 June 1999 Factors that determine the optimum reduction factor for wafer steppers

Harry J. Levinson, Paul W. Ackmann, Moshe E. Preil, William T. Rericha

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 3677, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XIII; (1999) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.350834
Event: Microlithography '99, 1999, Santa Clara, CA, United States

Abstract

The optimum reduction factor for stepper lenses is determined by trade-offs among several competing constraints and practical limitations. Lens reduction factor were chosen initially on the basis of several factors, including maximum lens element size, usable reticle field, stepper throughput and reticle glass size. These considerations led to the choice of 5x for the reduction factor initially and 4x for the most recent generation of step-and-scan systems. A large reduction factor is beneficial because it reduces the negative impacts of reticle linewidth variations, reticle registration errors, and reticle defects. This is particularly important for optical lithography processes that operate near the diffraction limit, where the mask error factor can be large. For this reason, as well travel down the roadmap, the 4x reduction factor for critical stepper lenses needs to be reconsidered. Before a decision is made, all consequences of a large reduction factor must be taken in to account. For fixed field sizes, reduction factors have been limited to 4x in order to achieve compatibility between 26 mm X 33 mm field sizes and 6 inch reticles, and the assumption of large die size. The reduction factor of 4x can be reconsidered if prior predictions of large die size are not realized of capability for making 230 mm reticles becomes available. The economics of 230 mm reticles changes favorably when the reduction factor is increased. Large reduction factors have relatively neutral effects on lens cost, but will make fast scanning more difficult. A proposal for a possible new optimum reduction is given from the analysis of these critical factors.

Citation Download Citation

Harry J. Levinson, Paul W. Ackmann, Moshe E. Preil, and William T. Rericha "Factors that determine the optimum reduction factor for wafer steppers", Proc. SPIE 3677, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XIII, (14 June 1999); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.350834

Access the abstract

PROCEEDINGS
11 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

CITATIONS

Cited by 1 scholarly publication.

Explore citations on Lens.org

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Reticles

Semiconducting wafers

Photomasks

Inspection

Lithography

Manufacturing

Lenses

Show All Keywords

RELATED CONTENT

New methodologies for lower-K1 EUV OPC and RET optimization
Proceedings of SPIE (March 24 2017)

Mask technology for 0.18-um device generation
Proceedings of SPIE (July 24 1996)

Cost-effective strategies for ASIC masks
Proceedings of SPIE (July 02 2003)

Process window sensitive full chip inspection for design to silicon...
Proceedings of SPIE (May 05 2005)

Design to process integration optimizing 130 nm X architecture...
Proceedings of SPIE (July 10 2003)

Applications of CPL mask technology for sub-65nm gate imaging
Proceedings of SPIE (May 12 2005)

Phase shift reticle design impact on patterned linewidth variation and...
Proceedings of SPIE (October 20 2006)

Subscribe to Digital Library

Receive Erratum Email Alert

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years