Flight performance using a hyperstereo helmet-mounted display: adaptation to hyperstereopsis

Geoffrey W. Stuart; Sion A. Jennings; Melvyn E. Kalich; Clarence E. Rash; Thomas H. Harding; Gregory L. Craig

doi:10.1117/12.820500

1 May 2009 Flight performance using a hyperstereo helmet-mounted display: adaptation to hyperstereopsis

Geoffrey W. Stuart, Sion A. Jennings, Melvyn E. Kalich, Clarence E. Rash, Thomas H. Harding, Gregory L. Craig

Proceedings Volume 7326, Head- and Helmet-Mounted Displays XIV: Design and Applications; 732606 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.820500
Event: SPIE Defense, Security, and Sensing, 2009, Orlando, Florida, United States

Abstract

Modern helmet-mounted night vision devices, such as the Thales TopOwl^TM helmet, project imagery from intensifiers mounted on the sides of the helmet onto the helmet visor. This increased effective inter-ocular separation distorts several cues to depth and distance that are grouped under the term "hyperstereopsis". Stereoscopic depth perception, at near to moderate distances (several hundred metres), is subject to magnification of binocular disparities. Absolute distance perception at near distances (a few metres) is affected by increased "differential perspective" as well as an increased requirement for convergence of the eyes to achieve binocular fixation. These distortions result in visual illusions such as the "bowl effect" where the ground appears to rise up near the observer. Previous reports have indicated that pilots can adapt to these distortions after several hours of exposure. The present study was concerned with both the time course and the mechanisms involved in this adaptation. Three test pilots flew five sorties with a hyperstereo night vision device. Initially, pilots reported that they were compensating for the effects of hyperstereopsis, but on the third and subsequent sorties all reported perceptual adaptation, that is, a reduction in illusory perception. Given that this adaptation was the result of intermittent exposure, and did not produce visual aftereffects, it was not due to the recalibration of the relationship between binocular cues and depth/distance. A more likely explanation of the observed visual adaptation is that it results from a discounting of distorted binocular cues in favour of veridical monocular cues, such as familiar size, motion parallax and linear perspective.

Citation Download Citation

Geoffrey W. Stuart, Sion A. Jennings, Melvyn E. Kalich, Clarence E. Rash, Thomas H. Harding, and Gregory L. Craig "Flight performance using a hyperstereo helmet-mounted display: adaptation to hyperstereopsis", Proc. SPIE 7326, Head- and Helmet-Mounted Displays XIV: Design and Applications, 732606 (1 May 2009); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.820500

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available