Generating reliable quality of information (QoI) metrics for target tracking

Chung Huat J. Tan; Duncan F. Gillies

doi:10.1117/12.817315

11 May 2009 Generating reliable quality of information (QoI) metrics for target tracking

Proceedings Volume 7336, Signal Processing, Sensor Fusion, and Target Recognition XVIII; 733607 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.817315
Event: SPIE Defense, Security, and Sensing, 2009, Orlando, Florida, United States

Abstract

Recently considerable research has been undertaken into estimating the quality of information (QoI) delivered by military sensor networks. QoI essentially estimates the probability that the information available from the network is correct. Knowledge of the QoI would clearly be of great use to decision makers using a network. An important class of sensors, that provide inputs to networks in real-life, are concerned with target tracking. Assessing the tracking performance of these sensors is an essential component in estimating the QoI of the whole network. We have investigated three potential QoI metrics for estimating the dynamic target tracking performance of systems based on some state estimation algorithms. We have tested them on different scenarios with varying degrees of tracking difficulty. We performed experiments on simulated data so that we have a ground truth against which to assess the performance of each metric. Our measure of ground truth is the Euclidean distance between the estimated position and the true position. Recently researchers have suggested using the entropy of the covariance matrix as a metric of QoI [1][2]. Two of our metrics were based on this approach, the first being the entropy of the co-variance matrix relative to an ideal distribution, and the second is the information gain at each update of the covariance matrix. The third metric was calculated by smoothing the residual likelihood value at each new measurement point, similar to the model update likelihood function in an IMM filter. Our experiment results show that reliable QoI metrics cannot be formulated by using solely the covariance matrices. In other words it is possible that a covariance matrix can have high information content, while the position estimate is wrong. On the other hand the smoothed residual likelihood does correlate well with tracking performance, and can be measured without knowledge of the true target position.

Citation Download Citation

Chung Huat J. Tan and Duncan F. Gillies "Generating reliable quality of information (QoI) metrics for target tracking", Proc. SPIE 7336, Signal Processing, Sensor Fusion, and Target Recognition XVIII, 733607 (11 May 2009); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.817315

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available