Comparing the performance of open loop centroiding techniques in the Raven MOAO system

David R. Andersen; Colin Bradley; Darryl Gamroth; Dan Kerley; Olivier Lardière; Jean-Pierre Véran

doi:10.1117/12.2057160

13 August 2014 Comparing the performance of open loop centroiding techniques in the Raven MOAO system

David R. Andersen, Colin Bradley, Darryl Gamroth, Dan Kerley, Olivier Lardière, Jean-Pierre Véran

Proceedings Volume 9148, Adaptive Optics Systems IV; 91485K (2014) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2057160
Event: SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, 2014, Montréal, Quebec, Canada

Abstract

Raven is a multi-object adaptive optics (MOAO) demonstrator that will be mounted on the NIR Nasmyth platform of the Subaru telescope in May, 2014. Raven can use three open-loop NGS WFSs and an on-axis LGS WFS to control DMs in two separate science pick-off arms. Centroiding in open loop AO systems like Raven is more difficult than in closed loop AO systems because the Shack-Hartmann spots will not be driven to the same spot on a detector. Rather the spots can fall on any combination of pixels because the WFSs need to have sufficient dynamic range to measure the full turbulence. In this paper, we compare correlation and thresholded center of gravity (tCOG) centroiding methods in simulation, with Raven using its calibration unit, and on-sky. Each method has its own advantages. Correlation centroiding is superior to tCOG centroiding for faint NGSs and for extended sources (Raven open loop WFSs do not contain ADCs so spots will become elongated). We expect that correlation centroiding will push the limiting magnitude of Raven NGSs fainter by roughly one magnitude. Correlation centroiding is computationally more intensive, however, and actually will limit Raven’s sampling rate for shorter integrations. Therefore, for bright stars with sufficiently high signal-to-noise, Raven can be run significantly faster and with superior performance using the tCOG method. Here we quantify both the performance and timing differences of these two centroiding methods in simulation, in the lab and on sky using Raven.

Citation Download Citation

David R. Andersen, Colin Bradley, Darryl Gamroth, Dan Kerley, Olivier Lardière, and Jean-Pierre Véran "Comparing the performance of open loop centroiding techniques in the Raven MOAO system", Proc. SPIE 9148, Adaptive Optics Systems IV, 91485K (13 August 2014); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2057160

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available