|
1.INTRODUCTION TO THE HANDS-ON OPTICS PROGRAMThe Hands-On Optics program was a National Science Foundation educational project originally designed for afterschool programs for middle school students and hands-on science and technology centers. Since its inception, it has also been used in school classrooms and in a variety of other informal education venues. The project was created in response to an assessment of national needs in optics and photonics education.1 The modules developed at the National Optical Astronomy Observatory were designed to encourage an active and prolonged engagement with optics and optical technology.2 The modules targeted and addressed reasoning difficulties and naive conceptions of students. This was an important aspect of the program. Students often have difficulties in experts consider quite elementary. For example, optics concepts like simple plane reflection3 or basic understandings of the nature of light are often difficult areas for novices.4 The program had a strong emphasis on professional development of the afterschool teachers or museum educators with the realization that their pedagogical knowledge and active involvement in encouraging the scientific process was critical to the experience of the students.5 The program was designed with the understanding that optics concepts and content knowledge are not always quickly or easily grasped by educators who do not possess a strong science background. To provide content knowledge, the program trained optics industry professionals (called Optics Resource Volunteers or ORVs) to play an important role in the program. They served as subject matter resource experts who assisted the program educators. The ORVs were teamed with science center and afterschool program educators. The educator would handle the educational pedagogy while the ORV provided background into the optics concepts and the actual practice of optical engineering, research, and manufacturing. Thus the educator less familiar with optic concepts and technology would have a backup resource person to provide assistance. The relationship between the ORV and the educator relied on a clear separation of roles and on mutual professional respect. The ORV did not need to become an education expert and vice versa. The ORVs worked well with the educators. The program facilitated a positive working relationship by training them together to use the Hands-On Optics materials and by encouraging them to use their complementary skills. The original setting for Hands-On Optics was in an informal or “free choice” environment, such as that found in museums and afterschool programs. This environment has been shown to be very powerful in stimulating student interest in science and in improving science literacy.6 The program has now been adapted for more formal classroom environments and has been used successfully in upper elementary and middle school classrooms. Each of the HOO modules had a content theme (such as simple reflection or polarization) and consisted of a sequence of activities that build basic (conceptual) knowledge and science process skills in this area. The modules also had demonstrations to illustrate basic principles or to excite student interest. At the end of each module is a culminating activity that also serves as a form of authentic assessment. This final activity combines many of the principles learned in that module in a way that reinforces the lessons learned from previous activities. Although educators could rely on ORVs for help in understanding the more complicated optical concepts, each educator was also expected to advance his or her knowledge of optics though a professional development program and through the use of a resource book published by the National Science Teachers Association that has an excellent treatment of basic optics principles for teachers.7 This book served as a reference for the educators we trained and was included in the kit. Each of the modules has a teaching guide on the activities as well as a kit that can serve about 30 students. This guide references the concepts and is tied to the national teaching standards. It also has a glossary and worksheets for the students that can be copied and distributed. The guide also has advice for the educator and of course describes any safety concerns. 2.PROGRAM GOALSThe Hands-On Optics program has well-defined programmatic goals that arose from partner discussions about the state of optics education. The modules were designed for use in a playful, exploratory way. The program goals are well-delineated and were described in an National Science Teachers Association publication:8 Table 1:Hands-On Optics Goals and Approaches
3.HANDS-ON OPTICS MODULESEach of the modules in the program covered one general topic. The modules were designed to build on each other, though modules could be used independently with some thought. Module 3 is situated in the sequence after studies of basic reflection and multiple reflections. Table 2:
The scope of these modules is extensive and each module was designed to be an intensive foray into a particular optical area. In general the activities of the modules averaged about 6 hours each. Given the large amount of time that it would take to do all of the activities, the professional development of our educators was a key concern for the project. Without training, it would be difficult for educators to feel comfortable with the material. The professional development workshops served as both a recruiting and training tool. Educators with interest in the program signed on for the workshops and received training before committing to the program. If they committed to using the modules they received the educational materials and kits. Over 25 professional development workshops were conducted across the country. Most of these workshops were two days in length and covered three modules. To assess the gains in concept knowledge a pre-test/post-test approach was used. Our NSF project evaluator measured educator concept and knowledge development as a result of the two-day workshop, where educators used the kits, explored the concepts, and worked with their volunteers. The educators made very significant gains in optics knowledge as exhibited by pre-test/post-test results. These results are seen in Table 3. Table 3Assessment of educator knowledge before and after the professional development program run by NOAO for Modules 4, 5, and 6. Significant gains were seen after each training.
• = Percent correct 4.MODULE 3: MAGNIFICENT MAGNIFICATIONSThis module has activities related to arranging lenses to magnify a distant object. The approach we take is to use an inquiry-based method to encourage student investigation. This approach uses a number of features of inquiry appropriate for middle school students, as outlined in the National Science Education Standards:9
While pursuing their areas of inquire, the students will have the opportunity to discover:
Some of the basic activities of Module 3 are (in sequence): A.Light Through an Acrylic Block(Demonstration) Starting with a laser shining at normal incidence to an acrylic block, the teacher will slowly increase the incident angle. The students will observe that the path of the light changes as the incident angle increases. B.Three Lasers Converging at a Focal Point(Demonstration) Students predict the path of the rays through an acrylic block and through a lens, then determine if they are correct by using a mister or chalk dust to expose the laser beams. C.Finding the Focal Length Using a Distant ObjectWhen looking at a brightly colored lamp on one side of the room, students will measure the focal length of a lens by forming an image of the light on a screen and measuring the distance between the lens and the screen. D.Simple MagnifiersIn this activity, students will explore the magnifying properties of the lenses and notice the connection between how much the lens is curved and its ability to magnify. The students can also see how a juice bottle filled with water can be used as a magnifier as well. 5.THE GALILEOSCOPEIn the final activity, the students build their own refracting telescope from a kit. When Hands-On Optics was first developed, the kit we had available for this activity was the Project STAR telescope kit developed at Harvard and distributed by Learning Technologies, Incorporated. This kit was used very successfully to teach optical principles but did not allow students to mount the telescope at night for observing of astronomical objects. The Project STAR telescope is seen in Figure 3and is described in more detail in papers reviewing the development of telescope kits for the International Year of Astronomy 2009.10 The Project STAR telescope performance is reviewed elsewhere.11 The Galileoscope telescope kit (in Figure 4) soon replaced the Project STAR telescope as the culminating activity of Module 3. With the high performance of the telescopes (good enough to see the rings of Saturn), students had a great desire to use the telescope at night as part of a star party or observing session. Programs to use the Galileoscope are described in detail in this volume and elsewhere.12 Some effort was also made to design the telescope so that its components could be used in studies of refraction. In this sense the telescope (when partially assembled) could be used as an optical bench. In order to be accepted by classroom teachers and schools, the Module 3 activities were correlated to the various U.S. national education standards. These included the national science education standards, the national technology education standards, and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics standards. With the recent introduction of the “Common Core” standards and the “Next Generation Science Standards” the modules must be updated to include them.13 For the Galileoscope component of the program, we have also created a specific teaching guide and an observing guide. The Galileoscope Optics Teaching Guide and the Galileoscope Observing Guide are available in pdf format at an NOAO-sponsored web site for educators: www.teachingwithtelescopes.org. 6.CONCLUSIONModule 3 of the Hands-On Optics program has been well received by formal and informal educators alike. The activities with lasers and lens have been greatly enjoyed by students. Because these activities have a strong basis in inquiry and are tied to national education standards they are widely accepted as progressive lessons. The Galileoscope component has become a favorite activity for students and has been used in many universities outreach programs. AcknowledgementsThe Hands-On Optics Project was funded by the National Science Foundation ISE program. Project PI: Anthony Johnson, Director of the Center for Advanced Studies in Photonics Research at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC), Project Co-PI Eugene Arthurs, Executive Director of SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering. Project Director and Co-PI Stephen Pompea, NOAO). The National Optical Astronomy Observatory is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA), Inc. under a cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation. REFERENCESWalker, J., Briggs, J., Gibbons, A., Putnam, G., Nally, T., and Shoop, B.,
“Optics Education–A Blueprint for the 21st Century,”
in Proceedings of the SPIE: Education and Training in Optics and Photonics,
(2002). Google Scholar
Humphrey, T. and Joshua P. Gutwill, J.,
“P and the Exploratorium APE Team 2005. Fostering Active Prolonged Engagement, The Art of Creating APE Exhibits,”
The Exploratorium, 138 Google Scholar
Goldberg F. M and McDermott, L. C.,
“Student difficulties in understanding image formation by a plane mirror,”
The Physics Teacher, 24
(8), 472
–80
(1986). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2342096 Google Scholar
Guesne, E.,
“Light,”
Children’s Ideas in Science, Open University Press, Milton Keynes
(1985). Google Scholar
Pompea, S. M. and Gek, T. K.,
“Optics in the Great Exploration in Math and Science (GEMS) Program: A Summary of Effective Pedagogical Approaches,”
in Proceedings of the SPIE: Education and Training in Optics and Photonics,
4588
(2002). Google Scholar
Pompea, S. M. and Hawkins, I.,
“Increasing Science Literacy in Optics and Photonics through Science Centers, Museums, and Web-based Exhibits,”
in Proceedings of the SPIE: Education and Training in Optics and Photonics,
4588
(2002). Google Scholar
Robertson, W., Light: Stop Faking It! Finally Understanding Science So You Can Teach It, 114 NSTA Press,2003). Google Scholar
Pompea, S. M., Walker, C. E., and Sparks, R. T.,
“Knowledge and Wonder: Engagements with Light and Color in the Hands-On Optics Project,”
Exemplary Science in Informal Education Settings: Standards-Based Success Stories, 47
–70 NSTA Press(2008). Google Scholar
National Research Council, Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
(2002). Google Scholar
Pompea, S. M., Fienberg, R. T., D. N. Arion, D. N, Smith, T.C., Isbell, D.,
“Progress on Creating the Galileoscope for the International Year of Astronomy 2009,”
in Preparing For The International Year Of Astronomy: A Hands-On Symposium, ASP Conference Series,
(2008). Google Scholar
Pompea, S. M., Pfisterer, R. N., Ellis, K. S., Arion, D. N., Fienberg, R. T.,
“Optical and System Engineering in the Development of a High-Quality Student Telescope Kit,”
in Proc. SPIE: Modeling, Systems Engineering, and Project Management for Astronomy IV,
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.858216 Google Scholar
Pompea, S. M., Sparks, R., and Walker, C.,
“Optics education through the Arizona Galileoscope Program,”
in Proceedings SPIE: Optics Education and Outreach II,
(2012). Google Scholar
“Next Generation Science Standards for Engineering, Technology, and the Applications of Science,”
Google Scholar
|