The unprecedented snowfall during early February 2010 in the Baltimore/Washington area provided a unique
opportunity to map, monitor and measure snowfall, snow cover extent, snow water equivalent (SWE), and snow
melt using a suite of remote sensing instruments. Because snow cover in the Middle Atlantic area of the United States is
in most years patchy and a true multi-layered snow pack is rarely established, utilizing a remote sensing approach to
observe snow parameters is more challenging than in regions where falling snow and snow packs are more reliable. The
Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for EOS (AMSR-E) was used to assess SWE and the onset of melt.
Although the passive microwave signatures illustrated in this study are clearly related to snow, it is not straightforward
whether or not the signatures are due to variations in SWE or to snowpack metamorphism or to a combination of both.
This study shows that the SWE algorithm was affected by the high variability of snowfall intensity and accumulation as
well as by the complex surface features in the Baltimore/Washington area. On the two days when intense snowfalls
occurred, February 6 and 10, 2010, retrievals of SWE were compromised. This was likely a result of thermal emission
from water droplets in low-level clouds within portions of the storm, which acted to increase AMSR-E Tbs, thereby
rendering minimal or zero values for SWE. The presence of such clouds strongly impacts the sensitivity of estimating
SWE using radiometric measurements near 19 and 37 GHz. Glaze or icy layers within and on the surface of the
snowpack served to increase scattering, thus lowering Tb and boosting the retrieved SWE values, resulting in an
overestimation of SWE, first in southern portions of the study area and then farther north as the month of February
progressed.
In this paper we show changes in the dates of snow disappearance in the Arctic between the late 1960s and the early 2000s, from arbitrary but consistent boundaries, using National Oceanic Atmospheric and Administration (NOAA) satellite observations. The date the snowline retreats during the spring (when it first moves north of the 60° and 70° parallels) has occurred approximately a week earlier in recent decades compared to the late 1960s, for many Arctic locations. During this same period, substantial portions of the Arctic have been experiencing higher temperatures and a conspicuous diminution of sea ice, especially in the past 10 years. Our results generally agree with these observations -- tendency toward earlier snowmelt was sustained until about 1990. Since that time, however, the date of snow disappearance has not been occurring noticeably earlier, and snow cover has actually been forming earlier in the autumn.
Passive microwave sensors onboard satellites can provide global snow water equivalent (SWE) observations day or night, even under cloudy conditions. However, there are both systematic (bias) and random errors associated with the passive microwave measurements. While these errors are well known, they have thus far not been adequately quantified. In this study, unbiased SWE maps, random error maps and systematic error maps of Eurasia for the 1990-1991 snow season (November-April) have been examined. Dense vegetation, especially in the taiga region, and large snow crystals (>0.3 mm in radius), found in areas where the temperature/vapor gradients are greatest, (in the taiga and tundra regions) are the major source of systematic error. Assumptions about how snow crystals evolve with the progression of the season also contribute to the errors. In general, while random errors for North America and Eurasia are comparable, systematic errors are not as great for Eurasia as those observed for North America. Understanding remote sensing retrieval errors is important for correct interpretation of observations, and successful assimilation of observations into numerical models.
This paper describes an approach to estimate global snow cover using satellite passive microwave data. Snow cover is detected using the high frequency scattering signal from natural microwave radiation, which is observed by passive microwave instruments. Developed for the retrieval of global snow depth and snow water equivalent using Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer EOS (AMSR-E), the algorithm uses passive microwave radiation along with a microwave emission model and a snow grain growth model to estimate snow depth. The microwave emission model is based on the Dense Media Radiative Transfer (DMRT) model that uses the quasi-crystalline approach and sticky particle theory to predict the brightness temperature from a single layered snowpack. The grain growth model is a generic single layer model based on an empirical approach to predict snow grain size evolution with time. Gridding to the 25 km EASE-grid projection, a daily record of Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) snow depth estimates was generated for December 2000 to March 2001. The estimates are tested using ground measurements from two continental-scale river catchments (Nelson River and the Ob River in Russia). This regional-scale testing of the algorithm shows that for passive microwave estimates, the average daily snow depth retrieval standard error between estimated and measured snow depths ranges from 0 cm to 40 cm of point observations. Bias characteristics are different for each basin. A fraction of the error is related to uncertainties about the grain growth initialization states and uncertainties about grain size changes through the winter season that directly affect the parameterization of the snow depth estimation in the DMRT model. Also, the algorithm does not include a correction for forest cover and this effect is clearly observed in the retrieval. Finally, error is also related to scale differences between in situ ground measurements and area-integrated satellite estimates. With AMSR-E data, improvements to snow depth and water equivalent estimates are expected since AMSR-E will have twice the spatial resolution of the SSM/I and will be able to characterize better the subnivean snow environment from an expanded range of microwave frequencies.
Results of this investigation confirm previous results by several other authors that correspondence between the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the Scanning Sensor Microwave Instrument (SSMI) - derived snow maps improves as the winter progresses. Early in the season, the SSMI snow mapping algorithms are unable to identify shallow and wet snow as snow cover, while the MODIS snow maps perform well under those circumstances, but cannot map snow through clouds and cannot provide estimates of SWE. By mid winter when the snowpack is deeper, temperatures are colder, and liquid water in the snowpack is minimal, the agreement between MODIS- and SSMI-derived snow maps improves. For North America, the difference between MODIS and SSMI was approximately 35% for early December but averaged about 5% for the maps examined in February of 2002, and for Eurasia (eastern Asia), the difference between the MODIS and SSMI maps was less than about 10% in early January of 2001.
In developing and tuning passive microwave algorithms, which are used to estimate snow extent, snow water equivalent and snow depth, much of the effort has been directed towards better accounting for the effects of snow crystal size on the microwave response, and relatively little effort has been given to the role that crystal shape or orientation plays in this regard. Modeling using a discrete dipole scattering models has shown that the assumption used in radiative transfer approaches, where snow crystals are modeled as randomly oriented spheres, is adequate to account for the transfer of microwave energy emanating from the ground and passing through a snowpack. With this in mind and by having some knowledge of the size of the particles in the snowpack as well as the snowpack density, snow depth algorithms can be designed for specific basins to assess the snow water equivalent of the basin and to thus, estimate snowmelt runoff and seasonal streamflow. Work performed on an ongoing GCIP/GEWEX experiment for watersheds in the upper Mid West and the northern Great Plains (the Roseau river basin in Minnesota/Manitoba, and the Black river basin in Wisconsin) has shown that for each of these basins, a strong conelation exists between snow depth derived from SSMI passive microwave data and snow depth measured at meteorological stations and determined from airborne gamma overflights. For instance, for the Roseau basin in mid March (Julian day 75), during the period from 1992-1998, the coefficient of determination (R2) is a very strong 0.8975. Thus, ninety percent of the mid March snow depth variation in this basin, during these years, can be explained by the SSMI snow algorithm. Streamfiow has also been correlated with maximum seasonal snow depth for these two basins as well (Figure 3). Using only SSMI-derived snow depth as the predictor or dependent variable, the R2 value for the Roseau basin was 0.715 between the basin-wide snow depth on March 15 and ensuing streamfiow for the month of April. When there is a high degree of assurance that the satellite-derived estimates are reliable (the algorithms produce results which reflect the streamfiow — hydrographs), they can then be used to generate input to hydrologic models.
With passive microwave snow data the most prominent error feature is the underestimation of snow mass during the winter, especially for North America. The reason why the microwave data underestimates snow mass primarily has to do with the effects of vegetation above snow fields. With the microwave data the emissivity of trees, especially dense conifers, can overwhelm the scattering signal which results when upwelling microwave energy is redistributed by snow crystals. The boreal forests which stretch across the northern tier of North America are perhaps the physiographic region where most of the difference occurs between the snow depth measurements based on climatological data and those based on microwave observations. Forests not only absorb some of the radiation scattered by snow crystals, but trees are also emitters of microwave radiation. So in forested areas the signal received by a radiometer on-board a satellite is produced by a combination of media. Generally, the denser the forest, the higher the microwave brightness temperature despite the type and condition of the media underlying the forest canopy. Furthermore, because the canopy shields the snow from direct solar radiation the deepest snow accumulates in the densest forests. However, if the fractional forest cover of a given microwave pixel can be accounted for in some way then microwave algorithms can be modified by including a forest cover parameter and estimates of snow depth will be improved. In this study we have used a vegetation index, derived from satellite brightness data, as an indicator of forest cover, and preliminary results show that this refined algorithm compares more favorably with climatological snow depths.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.