Ms. Jamie Gunter Profile

Jamie Gunter

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (2)

This will count as one of your downloads.

You will have access to both the presentation and article (if available).

DOWNLOAD NOW

This content is available for download via your institution's subscription. To access this item, please sign in to your personal account.

Email or Username Forgot your username?

Password Forgot your password?

Show

Keep me signed in

No SPIE account? Create an account

Proceedings Article | 6 March 2023 Paper

Contrast-Enhanced UltraSound (CEUS)-based characterization solid renal masses: a role for quantitative imaging approaches

Bino Varghese, Marielena Rivas, Steven Cen, Xiaomeng Lei, Michael Chang, KwangJu Lee, Jamie Gunter, Renata Amoedo, Mario Franco, Darryl Hwang, Bhushan Desai, Kevin King, Phillip Cheng, Vinay Duddalwar

Proceedings Volume 12567, 125670G (2023) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2670366

KEYWORDS: Radiomics, Statistical analysis, Visualization, Tumors, Ultrasonography, Tissues, Image segmentation

Read Abstract +

In this prospective study, forty patients with solid renal masses who underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations were selected. Using the ImageJ software, renal masses and adjacent normal tissue were manually segmented from CEUS cine exams obtained using the built-in RS85 Samsung scanner software. For the radiomics analysis, one frame representing precontrast, early, peak, and delay enhancement phase were selected post segmentation from each CEUS clip. From each region of interest (ROI) within a tumor tissue normalized renal mass, 112 radiomic metrics were extracted using custom Matlab® code. For the time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis, the segmented ROIs were plotted as a function of time, and the data were fit to a washout curve. From these time-signal intensity curves, perfusion quantitative parameters, were generated. Wilcoxon rank sum test or univariate independent t-test depending on data normality were used for descriptive analyses. Agreement was analyzed using Kappa statistic. Of the 40 solid masses, 31 (77.5%) were malignant, 9 (22.5%) were benign based on histopathology. Excellent agreement was found between histopathological confirmation and visual assessment based on CEUS in discriminating solid renal masses into benign vs. malignant categories (κ=0.89 95% confidence interval (CI): (0.77,1)). The total agreement between the two was 92.5%. The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS-based visual assessment was found to be 100% and 66.7%, respectively. Quantitative analysis revealed TIC metrics revealed statistically significant differences between the malignant and benign groups and between clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) subtypes. The study shows excellent agreement between visual assessment and histopathology, but with the room to improve in specificity.

Proceedings Article | 3 January 2020 Paper

Feasibility of Nakagami parametric image for texture analysis

Michael Chang, Bino Varghese, Jamie Gunter, Kwang Lee, Darryl Hwang, Vinay Duddalwar

Proceedings Volume 11330, 1133002 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2540513

KEYWORDS: Ultrasonography, Image analysis, Image processing, Data modeling

Read Abstract +

Purpose: Evaluate the feasibility of using a Nakagami model to create an accurate parametric image from ultrasound imaging data for the differentiation of homogenous and heterogeneous texture phantoms. Analysis was done on the raw data i.e., radiofrequency (RF) data collected before any post processing that can affect the images. Materials and methods: The Nakagami parametric image was constructed on demodulated RF data with the sliding window technique to create a map of local parameters. The Nakagami parameter (m) for the entire image was found by averaging all values. By design, when m is greater than 1, the distribution is post-Rayleigh. When m is equal to 1, the distribution is Rayleigh. To test the technique, two agar phantoms were constructed, using varying amounts of flour as the scatterer. The higher amount of flour scatterer was meant to mimic heterogeneous texture and the lesser amount meant to mimic homogeneous texture. Scans were done on each phantom and analyzed for differences in the Nakagami parameter. Results: Phantom 1 displayed a post-Rayleigh distribution (m = 36.1±7.0), while phantom 2 did so, to a lesser extent (m = 1.64±0.12). As the distribution transitions from Rayleigh to post Rayleigh, the scatterers in the sample go from being periodically located/randomly distributed to large numbers of randomly distributed scatterers. Conclusion: Our study suggests that Nakagami parametric based metrics may be used to increase robustness of texture analysis, considering the analysis is done on the raw data before any post processing that can affect the images is introduced.

My Library

You currently do not have any folders to save your paper to! Create a new folder below.

Folder Name

Folder Description

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks. You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*

*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please sign in to access your institution's subscriptions.

To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on SPIE.org.

ORGANIZATIONAL
Sign in with credentials provided by your organization.

Organizational Username

Organizational Password

Show/Hide Password

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members:

Non-members: ADD TO CART

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years