Mr. Minseong Kim Profile

Minseong Kim

at Pohang Univ. of Science and Technology

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (1)

This will count as one of your downloads.

You will have access to both the presentation and article (if available).

DOWNLOAD NOW

This content is available for download via your institution's subscription. To access this item, please sign in to your personal account.

Email or Username Forgot your username?

Password Forgot your password?

Show

Keep me signed in

No SPIE account? Create an account

Proceedings Article | 12 March 2024 Presentation + Paper

Comparative evaluation of photoacoustic finder as an alternative method for sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer patients

Moongyu Han, Youngjoo Lee, Junho Ahn, Minseong Kim, Sunghun Nam, Jeongwoo Park, Joongho Ahn, Byullee Park, Dooreh Kim

Proceedings Volume 12842, 1284208 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3000925

KEYWORDS: Lymph nodes, Breast cancer, Signal detection

Read Abstract +

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNb) plays an important role in determining whether breast cancer has metastasized. The current standard method for SLNb is to use radioactive material and blue dye to detect sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). However, this method has limitations such as radiation exposure, radioactive material disposal, and subjective evident interpretation of the blue dye. To overcome these limitations, we developed a non-radioactive detector, the photoacoustic finder (PAF), which utilizes the photoacoustic (PA) signal from the SLN's blue dye to identify SLNs instead of radioactive material. For evaluating the PAF, in this ex vivo clinical study, we compared the detection rate of standard SLN detection methods and PAF in resected SLNs from breast cancer patients. A total of 92 breast cancer patients were enrolled in the study, and 164 SLNs resected from the patients were analyzed. The detection rate was similar for gamma probe (85%, 139 of 164 SLNs) and PAF (85%, 139 of 164 SLNs), while the detection rate using blue dye visual inspection was 74% (122 of 164 SLNs), which was lower than gamma probe and PAF. These results affirm the validity of PAF as a non-radioactive alternative for detecting SLNs, indicating the potential feasibility of non-radioactive SLNb in future applications.

My Library

You currently do not have any folders to save your paper to! Create a new folder below.

Folder Name

Folder Description

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks. You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*

*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please sign in to access your institution's subscriptions.

To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on SPIE.org.

ORGANIZATIONAL
Sign in with credentials provided by your organization.

Organizational Username

Organizational Password

Show/Hide Password

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members:

Non-members: ADD TO CART

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years