Data scarcity and data imbalance are two major challenges in training deep learning models on medical images, such as brain tumor MRI data. The recent advancements in generative artificial intelligence have opened new possibilities for synthetically generating MRI data, including brain tumor MRI scans. This approach can be a potential solution to mitigate the data scarcity problem and enhance training data availability. This work focused on adapting the 2D latent diffusion models to generate 3D multi-contrast brain tumor MRI data with a tumor mask as the condition. The framework comprises two components: a 3D autoencoder model for perceptual compression and a conditional 3D Diffusion Probabilistic Model (DPM) for generating high-quality and diverse multi-contrast brain tumor MRI samples, guided by a conditional tumor mask. Unlike existing works that focused on generating either 2D multi-contrast or 3D single-contrast MRI samples, our models generate multi-contrast 3D MRI samples. We also integrated a conditional module within the UNet backbone of the DPM to capture the semantic class-dependent data distribution driven by the provided tumor mask to generate MRI brain tumor samples based on a specific brain tumor mask. We trained our models using two brain tumor datasets: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) public dataset and an internal dataset from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW). The models were able to generate high-quality 3D multi-contrast brain tumor MRI samples with the tumor location aligned by the input condition mask. The quality of the generated images was evaluated using the Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) score. This work has the potential to mitigate the scarcity of brain tumor data and improve the performance of deep learning models involving brain tumor MRI data.
KEYWORDS: Microspheres, Diffusion, Capillaries, Magnetic resonance imaging, Blood, Linear regression, Tissues, Statistical analysis, Voxels, Current controlled current source
PurposeQuantification of perfusion in ml/100 g/min, rather than comparing relative values side-to-side, is critical at the clinical and research levels for large longitudinal and multi-center trials. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) is a non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging diffusion-based scan that uses a multitude of b-values to measure various speeds of molecular perfusion and diffusion, sidestepping inaccuracy of arterial input functions or bolus kinetics. Questions remain as to the original of the signal and whether IVIM returns quantitative and accurate perfusion in a pathology setting. This study tests a novel method of IVIM perfusion quantification compared with neutron capture microspheres.ApproachWe derive an expression for the quantification of capillary blood flow in ml/100 g/min by solving the three-dimensional Gaussian probability distribution and defining water transport time (WTT) as when 50% of the original water remains in the tissue of interest. Calculations were verified in a six-subject pre-clinical canine model of normocapnia, CO2 induced hypercapnia, and middle cerebral artery occlusion (ischemic stroke) and compared with quantitative microsphere perfusion.ResultsLinear regression analysis of IVIM and microsphere perfusion showed agreement (slope = 0.55, intercept = 52.5, R2 = 0.64) with a Bland–Altman mean difference of −11.8 [ − 78,54 ] ml / 100 g / min. Linear regression between dynamic susceptibility contrast mean transit time and IVIM WTT asymmetry in infarcted tissue was excellent (slope = 0.59, intercept = 0.3, R2 = 0.93). Strong linear agreement was found between IVIM and reference standard infarct volume (slope = 1.01, R2 = 0.79). The simulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) suppression via inversion recovery returned a blood signal reduced by 82% from combined T1 and T2 effects.ConclusionsThe accuracy and sensitivity of IVIM provides evidence that observed signal changes reflect cytotoxic edema and tissue perfusion and can be quantified with WTT. Partial volume contamination of CSF may be better removed during post-processing rather than with inversion recovery.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.