Ms. Valerie Celis Profile

Valerie Celis

at UZ Leuven

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (1)

This will count as one of your downloads.

You will have access to both the presentation and article (if available).

DOWNLOAD NOW

This content is available for download via your institution's subscription. To access this item, please sign in to your personal account.

Email or Username Forgot your username?

Password Forgot your password?

Show

Keep me signed in

No SPIE account? Create an account

Proceedings Article | 13 July 2022 Paper

Objective and subjective assessment of mammographic positioning quality

Marthe Picard, Lesley Cockmartin, Kristin Buelens, Sandra Postema, Valerie Celis, Cédric Aesseloos, Hilde Bosmans

Proceedings Volume 12286, 122860F (2022) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2624400

KEYWORDS: Breast, Tissues, Nipple, Image quality, Mammography, Skin, Breast cancer, Reliability, Medical imaging, Binary data

Read Abstract +

Early detection of breast cancer through mammographic screening can only be achieved with high quality mammograms. In this study an experienced radiologist and radiographer scored 127 mammographic screening exams with MLO and CC views of left and right breasts using 18 different positioning quality criteria. This subjective evaluation of the positioning quality was compared to the objective and automatic assessment by Volpara TruPGMI (Volpara Health, New Zealand). The quality criteria on missed tissue at medial or lateral side of the breast were in agreement with the software for the radiographer but was scored differently by the radiologist. The criterion on the nipple in profile showed good agreement between the readers and the software. The important criterion on the number of images that had to be repeated showed that even though the same amount of cases was rated to be repeated, the majority of the cases were discordant between radiologist and software, the agreement with the radiographer was better. The presence of folds in the pectoral muscle, the adequate depiction of the pectoral muscle and inframammary angle on MLO view showed an acceptable agreement between the readers and software. Finally, the overall positioning quality was rated as Perfect, Good, Moderate or Inadequate. The extreme ratings of Perfect and Inadequate showed high agreement between readers and software. However the number of intermediate ratings “Moderate” and “Good” were very different. For the readers the majority of the images was “Good” whereas the software scored most often “Moderate”. Subjective positioning quality monitoring is prone to high reader variability; this can be overcome via the use of automatic measurements with software. Nevertheless, prior to the use of automatic quality monitoring software in clinical practice, a careful evaluation and validation is needed.

My Library

You currently do not have any folders to save your paper to! Create a new folder below.

Folder Name

Folder Description

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks. You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*

*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please sign in to access your institution's subscriptions.

To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on SPIE.org.

ORGANIZATIONAL
Sign in with credentials provided by your organization.

Organizational Username

Organizational Password

Show/Hide Password

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

;

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members:

Non-members: ADD TO CART

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years