Paper
15 September 1993 Photoresist surface induction and its effect on swing behavior
Steven G. Hansen, Rodney J. Hurditch, David J. Brzozowy, Stewart A. Robertson
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Thin film optical interference causes a sinusoidal variation in lithographic properties with film thickness known as the swing effect. The most well known manifestations are the threshold clearing energy (E0) and critical dimension (CD) swings which arise due to variations in the in-coupling efficiency of light. The E0 swing is conceptually simple, requiring only that the amount of photo-active compound (PAC) conversion is constant within a swing film thickness cycle. The present work verifies that E0 swing is a purely optical effect and is independent of bulk dissolution curve details. For resists of identical optical properties, the faster one will have the lower E0 swing. `Secondary' swing effects, defined here as lithographic changes arising due to remnant standing wave phase at the film surface, include variations in gamma, resolution, focus latitude, and profile. Some i-line photoresists, particularly those which give significant surface induction in development, show large oscillations in these performance measures depending on swing phase.
© (1993) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Steven G. Hansen, Rodney J. Hurditch, David J. Brzozowy, and Stewart A. Robertson "Photoresist surface induction and its effect on swing behavior", Proc. SPIE 1925, Advances in Resist Technology and Processing X, (15 September 1993); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.154798
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 1 scholarly publication.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Lithography

Picture Archiving and Communication System

Critical dimension metrology

Reflectivity

Absorption

Photoresist materials

Optical properties

Back to Top