Alternative EUV mask technology to compensate for mask 3D effects

Lieve Van Look; Vicky Philipsen; Eric Hendrickx; Geert Vandenberghe; Natalia Davydova; Friso Wittebrood; Robert de Kruif; Anton van Oosten; Junji Miyazaki; Timon Fliervoet; Jan van Schoot; Jens Timo Neumann

doi:10.1117/12.2197213

9 July 2015 Alternative EUV mask technology to compensate for mask 3D effects

Lieve Van Look, Vicky Philipsen, Eric Hendrickx, Geert Vandenberghe, Natalia Davydova, Friso Wittebrood, Robert de Kruif, Anton van Oosten, Junji Miyazaki, Timon Fliervoet, Jan van Schoot, Jens Timo Neumann

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 9658, Photomask Japan 2015: Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology XXII; 96580I (2015) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2197213
Event: Photomask Japan 2015, 2015, Yokohama, Japan

Abstract

Traditional EUV masks, with absorber on top of the multi-layer (ML) mirror, generally suffer from mask 3D effects: H/V shadowing, best focus shifts through pitch and pattern shifts through focus. These effects reduce the overlapping process window, complicate optical proximity correction and generate overlay errors. With further pitch scaling, these mask 3D effects are expected to become stronger, increasing the need for a compensation strategy. In this study, we have proven by simulations and experiments that alternative mask technologies can lower mask 3D effects and therefore have the potential to improve the imaging of critical EUV layers. We have performed an experimental imaging study of a prototype Etched ML mask, which has recently become available. This prototype alternative mask has only half the ML mirror thickness (20 Mo/Si pairs) and contains no absorber material at all. Instead, the ML mirror is etched away to the substrate at the location of the dark features. For this Etched ML mask, we have compared the imaging performance for mask 3D related effects to that of a standard EUV mask, using wafer exposures at 0.33 NA. Experimental data are compared to the simulated predictions and the benefits and drawbacks of such an alternative mask are shown. Besides the imaging performance, we will also discuss the manufacturability challenges related to the etched ML mask technology.

Citation Download Citation

Lieve Van Look, Vicky Philipsen, Eric Hendrickx, Geert Vandenberghe, Natalia Davydova, Friso Wittebrood, Robert de Kruif, Anton van Oosten, Junji Miyazaki, Timon Fliervoet, Jan van Schoot, and Jens Timo Neumann "Alternative EUV mask technology to compensate for mask 3D effects", Proc. SPIE 9658, Photomask Japan 2015: Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology XXII, 96580I (9 July 2015); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2197213

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available