Dr. Sherry C. Mayo Profile

Dr. Sherry C. Mayo

Senior Research Scientist at CSIRO

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Proceedings Article | 4 April 2022 Poster + Paper

Energy optimisation of propagation-based phase-contrast computed tomography: a quantitative image quality assessment

Belinda Lim, Sarah Lewis, Benedicta Arhatari, Yakov Nesterets, Sheridan Mayo, Darren Thomposon, Jane Fox, Beena Kumar, Daniel Hausermann, Anton Maksimenko, Christopher Hall, Matthew Dimmock, Darren Lockie, Mary Rickard, Nicola Giannotti, Andrew Peele, Harry Quiney, Timur Gureyev, Patrick Brennan, SeyedamirTavakoli Taba

Proceedings Volume 12031, 120313O (2022) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2608596

KEYWORDS: Image quality, X-rays, Breast, Signal to noise ratio, X-ray imaging, Quality measurement, Visualization, Visibility, Phase contrast

Read Abstract +

SPIE Journal Paper | 7 February 2022

Dark-field tomography of an attenuating object using intrinsic x-ray speckle tracking

Samantha Alloo, David Paganin, Kaye Morgan, Marcus Kitchen, Andrew Stevenson, Sheridan Mayo, Heyang Li, Ben Kennedy, Anton Maksimenko, Joshua Bowden, Konstantin Pavlov

JMI, Vol. 9, Issue 03, 031502, (February 2022) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.10.1117/1.JMI.9.3.031502

KEYWORDS: X-rays, Speckle, X-ray imaging, Tomography, Signal attenuation, Sensors, Fluctuations and noise, Scattering, Inverse problems, Statistical modeling

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 9 September 2021 Presentation + Paper

Speckle-based x-ray dark-field tomography of an attenuating object

S. Alloo, D. Paganin, K. Morgan, M. Kitchen, A. Stevenson, S. Mayo, H. Li, B. Kennedy, A. Maksimenko, J. Bowden, K. Pavlov

Proceedings Volume 11840, 118400G (2021) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2597722

KEYWORDS: X-rays, X-ray imaging, Signal attenuation, Speckle, Scattering, Fluctuations and noise, Tomography, Inverse problems, CT reconstruction, Phase contrast

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 9 September 2021 Presentation + Paper

X-ray phase-contrast computed tomography for full breast mastectomy imaging at the Australian Synchrotron

Benedicta Arhatari, Yakov Nesterets, Seyedamir Taba, Anton Maksimenko, Christopher Hall, Andrew Stevenson, Daniel Häsermann, Sarah Lewis, Matthew Dimmock, Darren Thompson, Sheridan Mayo, Harry Quiney, Timur Gureyev, Patrick Brennan

Proceedings Volume 11840, 1184012 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2596225

KEYWORDS: Breast, X-rays, Tissues, Synchrotrons, Phase retrieval, X-ray imaging, Image quality, Breast cancer, Computed tomography, Phase contrast

Read Abstract +

One of the imaging modalities offered by the Imaging and Medical Beamline (IMBL) at the Australian Synchrotron is Xray phase-contrast propagation-based computed tomography (PB-CT). The unique combination of high coherence and high brightness of radiation produced by synchrotron X-ray sources enables phase contrast imaging with excellent sensitivity to small density differences in soft tissues and tumors. The PB-CT images using spatially coherent radiation show high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) without reducing the spatial resolution. This is due to the combined effect of forward free-space propagation and the advanced step of phase retrieval in the reconstruction processes that allows to accommodate noisier recorded images. This gives an advantage of potentially reducing the radiation dose delivered to the sample whilst preserving the reconstructed image quality. It is expected that the PB-CT technique will be well suited for diagnostic breast imaging in the near future with the advantage that it could provide better tumor detection and characterization/grading than mammography and other breast imaging modalities/techniques in general. The PB-CT technique is expected to reduce false negative and false positive cancer diagnoses that result from overlapping regions of tissue in 2D mammography and avoid patient pain and discomfort that results from breast compression. The present paper demonstrates that PB-CT produces superior results for imaging low-density materials such as breast mastectomy samples, when compared to the conventional absorption-based CT collected at the same radiation dose. The performance was quantified in terms of both the measured objective image characteristics and the subjective scores from radiological assessments. This work is part of the ongoing research project aimed at the introduction of 3D X-ray medical imaging at the IMBL as innovative tomographic methods to improve the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Major progress of this project includes the characterization of a large number of mastectomy samples, both normal and cancerous.

SPIE Journal Paper | 12 July 2021

Effect of x-ray energy on the radiological image quality in propagation-based phase-contrast computed tomography of the breast

Sarina Wan, Benedicta Arhatari, Yakov Nesterets, Sheridan Mayo, Darren Thompson, Jane Fox, Beena Kumar, Zdenka Prodanovic, Daniel Hausermann, Anton Maksimenko, Christopher Hall, Matthew Dimmock, Konstantin Pavlov, Darren Lockie, Mary Rickard, Ziba Gandomkar, Alaleh Alaleh, Elham Vafa, Andrew Peele, Harry Quiney, Sarah Lewis, Timur Gureyev, Patrick Brennan, Seyedamir Tavakoli Taba

JMI, Vol. 8, Issue 05, 052108, (July 2021) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.10.1117/1.JMI.8.5.052108

KEYWORDS: Image quality, X-rays, X-ray imaging, Breast, Sensors, Breast cancer, Tissues, Radio propagation, X-ray detectors, X-ray computed tomography

Read Abstract +

Purpose: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women in developing and developed countries and is responsible for 15% of women’s cancer deaths worldwide. Conventional absorption-based breast imaging techniques lack sufficient contrast for comprehensive diagnosis. Propagation-based phase-contrast computed tomography (PB-CT) is a developing technique that exploits a more contrast-sensitive property of x-rays: x-ray refraction. X-ray absorption, refraction, and contrast-to-noise in the corresponding images depend on the x-ray energy used, for the same/fixed radiation dose. The aim of this paper is to explore the relationship between x-ray energy and radiological image quality in PB-CT imaging. Approach: Thirty-nine mastectomy samples were scanned at the imaging and medical beamline at the Australian Synchrotron. Samples were scanned at various x-ray energies of 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, and 60 keV using a Hamamatsu Flat Panel detector at the same object-to-detector distance of 6 m and mean glandular dose of 4 mGy. A total of 132 image sets were produced for analysis. Seven observers rated PB-CT images against absorption-based CT (AB-CT) images of the same samples on a five-point scale. A visual grading characteristics (VGC) study was used to determine the difference in image quality. Results: PB-CT images produced at 28, 30, 32, and 34 keV x-ray energies demonstrated statistically significant higher image quality than reference AB-CT images. The optimum x-ray energy, 30 keV, displayed the largest area under the curve ( AUCVGC ) of 0.754 (p = 0.009). This was followed by 32 keV (AUCVGC = 0.731, p ≤ 0.001), 34 keV (AUCVGC = 0.723, p ≤ 0.001), and 28 keV (AUCVGC = 0.654, p = 0.015). Conclusions: An optimum energy range (around 30 keV) in the PB-CT technique allows for higher image quality at a dose comparable to conventional mammographic techniques. This results in improved radiological image quality compared with conventional techniques, which may ultimately lead to higher diagnostic efficacy and a reduction in breast cancer mortalities.

Proceedings Article | 22 May 2020 Paper

Comparison of propagation-based phase-contrast CT and absorption-based CT for breast imaging using synchrotron radiation

Seyedamir Tavakoli Taba, Sarah Lewis, Patrycja Baran, Benedicta Arhatari, Yakov Nesterets, Sheridan Mayo, Darren Thompson, Jane Fox, Beena Kumar, Zdenka Prodanovic, Daniel Hausermann, Anton Maksimenko, Christopher Hall, Matthew Dimmock, Konstantin Pavlov, Andrew Peele, Harry Quiney, Darren Lockie, Giuliana Tromba, Timur Gureyev, Patrick Brennan

Proceedings Volume 11513, 115130T (2020) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2564053

KEYWORDS: Phase contrast, Image quality, Breast, X-ray computed tomography, X-rays, Tissues, Synchrotrons, Visualization, Breast imaging, Synchrotron radiation, X-ray imaging

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 2 September 2010 Paper

Data-constrained microstructure modeling with multi-spectrum x-ray CT

Y. Yang, A. Tulloh, T. Muster, A. Trinchi, S. Mayo, S. Wilkins

Proceedings Volume 7804, 78040N (2010) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.861964

KEYWORDS: X-rays, Data modeling, Electron beams, Strontium, Signal attenuation, Corrosion, Tomography, Scanning electron microscopy, 3D modeling, Titanium dioxide

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 17 September 2008 Paper

Quantitative phase-contrast tomography using polychromatic radiation

Glenn Myers, Timur Gureyev, David Paganin, Karen K. Siu, Sheridan Mayo, Stephen Wilkins

Proceedings Volume 7078, 707819 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.795999

KEYWORDS: Refractive index, Tomography, X-rays, Binary data, Reconstruction algorithms, Sensors, Absorption, Computed tomography, Spatial resolution, X-ray imaging

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 16 September 2008 Paper

Quantitative investigation of phase retrieval from x-ray phase-contrast tomographic images

H. Moser, K. Banas, A. Chen, T. Vo Nghia, L. Jian, S. M. Kalaiselvi, G. Liu, S. Maniam, P. Gu, S. Wilkins, T. Gureyev, S. Mayo, M. Cholewa, Z. Li

Proceedings Volume 7078, 707814 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.794497

KEYWORDS: X-rays, Tomography, X-ray imaging, Solid state lighting, Absorption, Refractive index, Phase retrieval, Scanning electron microscopy, Phase contrast, Manufacturing

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 7 September 2006 Paper

Laboratory-based x-ray micro-tomography with submicron resolution

S. Mayo, P. Miller, S. Wilkins, D. Gao, T. Gureyev

Proceedings Volume 6318, 63181E (2006) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.680154

KEYWORDS: Tomography, X-rays, Reconstruction algorithms, Scanning electron microscopy, Image resolution, Sensors, Phase contrast, Foam, 3D modeling, Phase retrieval

Read Abstract +

Showing 5 of 10 publications

Conference Committee Involvement (2)

Developments in X-Ray Tomography XI

8 August 2017 | San Diego, California, United States

Developments in X-Ray Tomography X

29 August 2016 | San Diego, California, United States

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years