Critical dimension control is essential in the semiconductor industry and becomes more challenging as photolithography limits keep getting pushed to reach technological nodes smaller than 10 nm. To ensure the quality and control of the processes, it becomes necessary to explore new metrology techniques. In this sense, critical dimension small-angle x-ray scattering (CDSAXS) has been identified as a potential candidate for determining the average shape of a line grating with a sub-nanometric precision. We benchmark the CDSAXS results obtained at the synchrotron to the optical critical dimension, critical dimension scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy measurements collected from industrial metrology tools either at the manufacturing line or in the characterization laboratory. Emphasis is placed on the impact of the use of independent model for each technique and the benefits of unifying it in a unique model. We also discuss the differences between all of these multi-scale and multi-physics techniques, question our capacity to compare them, and eventually correlate the results obtained on several samples.
Critical Dimension (CD) control is essential in the semiconductor industry and becomes more challenging as photolithography limits keep getting pushed to reach technological nodes smaller than 10 nm. To ensure quality and control of the processes, it becomes necessary to explore new metrology techniques. In this sense, Critical Dimension Small-Angle X-ray Scattering (CDSAXS) has been identified as a potential candidate to determine the average shape of a line grating with a sub-nanometric precision. In this paper we benchmark the CDSAXS results to Optical Critical Dimension (OCD), Critical Dimension Scanning Electron Microscopy (CDSEM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) measurements previously collected from industrial metrology tools at manufacturing line and in characterization laboratory. Emphasis is placed on the model used for CDSAXS and how to improve it. We discuss the differences between all these multi-scale and multi-physics techniques, and question our capacity to compare them.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.